Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Feb 6, 2024; 12(4): 729-736
Published online Feb 6, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i4.729
Published online Feb 6, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i4.729
Table 1 Comparison of general data of patients in the two groups
Items | Observation group, n = 40 | Control group, n = 40 | t/χ² value | P value | |
Age (yr) | 52.28 ± 5.12 | 52.75 ± 6.21 | 0.392 | 0.695 | |
Sex | Male | 25 (62.50) | 27 (67.50) | 0.219 | 0.639 |
Female | 15 (37.50) | 13 (32.50) | |||
BMI (kg/m²) | 22.79 ± 1.13 | 22.93 ± 1.22 | 0.532 | 0.595 | |
Infection site | Abdominal cavity | 7 (17.50) | 8 (20.00) | 0.569 | 0.752 |
Blood system | 5 (12.50) | 7 (17.50) | |||
Lung | 28 (70.00) | 25 (62.50) | |||
APACHEII | 18.56 ± 3.94 | 18.21 ± 4.59 | 0.365 | 0.715 |
Table 2 Comparison of changes in cardiac function before and after treatment
Groups | Time | CVP in cmH2O | cTnI in μg/L | BNP in pg/mL |
Observation group, n = 40 | Before treatment | 3.36 ± 1.12 | 5.52 ± 1.03 | 825.34 ± 227.87 |
After treatment | 10.67 ± 2.28a | 1.83 ± 0.48a | 478.96 ± 153.54a | |
Control group, n = 40 | Before treatment | 3.54 ± 1.38 | 5.48 ± 0.86 | 846.59 ± 268.35 |
After treatment | 8.32 ± 2.08a | 2.25 ± 0.96a | 618.15 ± 166.82a | |
t value After treatment | 4.815 | 2.474 | 3.882 | |
P value After treatment | < 0.001 | 0.015 | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of changes in lung function before and after treatment
Groups | Time | Diaphragmatic range of motion in mm | ScvO2 | PaO2/FiO2 in mmHg |
Observation group, n = 40 | Before treatment | 22.28 ± 4.63 | 0.55 ± 0.06 | 176.36 ± 25.87 |
After treatment | 46.94 ± 5.18a | 0.73 ± 0.045a | 312.44 ± 29.78a | |
Control group, n = 40 | Before treatment | 23.16 ± 5.12 | 0.54 ± 0.05 | 181.54 ± 26.45 |
After treatment | 43.72 ± 6.06a | 0.69 ± 0.02a | 285.61 ± 25.94a | |
t value after treatment | 2.554 | 4.697 | 4.296 | |
P value after treatment | 0.012 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of changes in quality of life before and after treatment
Groups | Time | Role function | Somatic function | Emotion function | Cognitive function | Social function |
Observation group, n = 40 | Before treatment | 68.79 ± 3.95 | 64.57 ± 3.62 | 65.77 ± 3.89 | 63.56 ± 3.85 | 64.93 ± 3.51 |
After treatment | 85.64 ± 3.98a | 86.78 ± 3.16a | 88.34 ± 4.09a | 85.73 ± 3.59a | 89.33 ± 2.27a | |
Control group, n = 40 | Before treatment | 68.47 ± 3.52 | 63.99 ± 3.06 | 65.82 ± 4.01 | 63.14 ± 4.12 | 65.02 ± 3.62 |
After treatment | 74.15 ± 3.23a | 73.75 ± 3.49a | 74.84 ± 3.97a | 76.83 ± 4.25a | 75.84 ± 3.24a | |
t value after treatment | 14.177 | 17.503 | 14.979 | 10.117 | 21.566 | |
P value after treatment | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of complications
Groups | n | Ventilator-associated pneumonia | Tracheostomy | ICU-acquired frailty |
Observation group | 40 | 2 (5.00) | 1 (2.50) | 1 (2.50) |
Control group | 40 | 5 (12.50) | 4 (10.00) | 3 (7.50) |
χ² value | 0.626 | 0.853 | 0.263 | |
P value | 0.428 | 0.355 | 0.607 |
- Citation: Zheng MH, Liu WJ, Yang J. Effect of early stepwise cardiopulmonary rehabilitation on function and quality of life in sepsis patients. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(4): 729-736
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v12/i4/729.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i4.729