Zhou JJ, Yu K, Mao HY, Li C. Comparison of ovarian preservation versus oophorectomy on fertility outcomes in patients with endometriosis post-laparoscopic surgery: A prospective study. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(21): 4652-4660 [PMID: 39070836 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i21.4652]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Cen Li, MM, Doctor, Department of Gynecology, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, No. 368 Hanjiang Middle Road, Hanjiang District, Yangzhou 225001, Jiangsu Province, China. licen86@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Medicine, General & Internal
Article-Type of This Article
Prospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Jul 26, 2024; 12(21): 4652-4660 Published online Jul 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i21.4652
Table 1 Baseline characteristics, n (%)
Characteristic
Ovarian preservation group (n = 204)
Oophorectomy group (n = 108)
P value
Age (years), mean ± SD
32.4 ± 4.8
34.1 ± 5.2
0.11
BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD
24.6 ± 3.9
25.1 ± 4.2
0.28
Nulliparous
137 (67.2)
77 (71.3)
0.45
ASRM stage
I
22 (10.8)
9 (8.3)
0.51
II
38 (18.6)
17 (15.7)
0.54
III
81 (39.7)
46 (42.6)
0.63
IV
63 (30.9)
36 (33.3)
0.67
Table 2 Postoperative pain scores (visual analog scale)
Time point
Ovarian preservation group (n = 204)
Oophorectomy group (n = 108)
P value
3 months
2.8 ± 1.6
2.6 ± 1.8
0.31
6 months
2.1 ± 1.4
1.9 ± 1.6
0.27
12 months
1.5 ± 1.2
1.3 ± 1.1
0.19
24 months
1.1 ± 0.9
0.9 ± 0.8
0.07
Table 3 Surgical complications, n (%)
Complication
Ovarian preservation group (n = 204)
Oophorectomy group (n = 108)
P value
Any complication
25 (12.3)
16 (14.8)
0.51
Bleeding
8 (3.9)
6 (5.6)
0.51
Infection
6 (2.9)
3 (2.8)
0.93
Bladder/bowel injury
4 (2.0)
3 (2.8)
0.63
Others
7 (3.4)
4 (3.7)
0.9
Table 4 Spontaneous pregnancy rates by age subgroup
Age subgroup
Ovarian preservation group
Oophorectomy group
P value
≤ 35 years
50.8% (74/146)
31.6% (24/76)
0.002
35 years
26.7% (15/58)
22.2% (7/32)
0.61
Table 5 Spontaneous pregnancy rates by American Society for Reproductive Medicine stage
ASRM stage
Ovarian preservation group
Oophorectomy group
P value
I/II
38.3% (23/60)
34.6% (9/26)
0.73
III
46.9% (38/81)
30.2% (14/46)
0.017
IV
39.5% (28/63)
24.1% (8/36)
0.038
Table 6 Outcomes by surgical technique (ovarian preservation group)
Outcome
Cystectomy (n = 138)
Drainage (n = 66)
P value
Spontaneous pregnancy rate
44.9% (62/138)
40.9% (27/66)
0.58
Recurrence rate
20.3% (28/138)
25.8% (17/66)
0.37
Citation: Zhou JJ, Yu K, Mao HY, Li C. Comparison of ovarian preservation versus oophorectomy on fertility outcomes in patients with endometriosis post-laparoscopic surgery: A prospective study. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(21): 4652-4660