Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 6, 2024; 12(19): 3708-3716
Published online Jul 6, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i19.3708
Published online Jul 6, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i19.3708
Table 1 Comparison of clinical data between the two groups
Variable | Control group (n = 50) | Observation group (n = 50) | t/χ2/u | P value | |
Age (yr) | 2-13 (7.53 ± 1.98) | 3-14 (7.73 ± 2.06) | 0.495 | 0.622 | |
Gender (male/female) | 30/20 | 27/23 | 0.367 | 0.545 | |
Course of disease (years) | 1-4 (2.97 ± 0.23) | 2-5 (3.01 ± 0.44) | 0.570 | 0.570 | |
Family degree | Junior high school and below | 4 (8.00) | 5 (10.00) | 0.125 | 0.940 |
Senior high school | 9 (18.00) | 9 (18.00) | |||
College degree or above | 37 (74.00) | 36 (72.00) |
Table 2 Comparison of disease knowledge cognition between the two groups (mean ± SD, point)
Time | Group | n | Knowledge of medication | Home management | Disease knowledge | Symptom management | Prophylaxis | Healthy diet | Total score |
Pre-intervention | Observation group | 50 | 6.05 ± 2.12 | 5.03 ± 1.47 | 5.07 ± 1.87 | 4.93 ± 1.13 | 5.73 ± 1.07 | 6.03 ± 1.17 | 32.84 ± 5.92 |
Control group | 50 | 5.97 ± 1.89 | 4.82 ± 1.56 | 4.93 ± 1.39 | 5.07 ± 1.23 | 5.92 ± 1.56 | 6.32 ± 1.56 | 33.03 ± 6.09 | |
t value | 0.199 | 0.693 | 0.425 | -0.593 | -0.710 | -1.052 | -0.158 | ||
P value | 0.843 | 0.490 | 0.672 | 0.555 | 0.479 | 0.296 | 0.875 | ||
Post-intervention | Observation group | 50 | 8.26 ± 1.47 | 7.97 ± 1.42 | 8.94 ± 0.58 | 8.71 ± 0.97 | 8.87 ± 1.03 | 8.27 ± 1.34 | 51.02 ± 5.34 |
Control group | 50 | 7.62 ± 1.34 | 6.53 ± 1.25 | 7.60 ± 0.42 | 7.18 ± 1.03 | 7.67 ± 1.34 | 7.03 ± 1.08 | 43.63 ± 4.27 | |
t value | 2.275 | 5.382 | 13.232 | 7.647 | 5.021 | 5.095 | 7.643 | ||
P value | 0.025 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Table 3 compares symptom control between the two groups [n (%)]
Group | n | No daytime symptoms | No nocturnal symptoms | No limitation of movement | No palliative drugs were used |
Observation group | 50 | 39 (78.00) | 37 (74.00) | 36 (72.00) | 38 (76.00) |
Control group | 50 | 28 (56.00) | 22 (44.00) | 21 (42.00) | 22 (44.00) |
χ2 | 5.472 | 9.301 | 9.179 | 10.667 | |
P value | 0.019 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire scores between the two groups (mean ± SD, point)
Time | Group | n | Symptom score | Impact score | Mobility score | Total score |
Pre-intervention | Observation group | 50 | 67.23 ± 11.98 | 60.27 ± 12.34 | 34.98 ± 9.16 | 54.16 ± 9.47 |
Control group | 50 | 65.78 ± 10.08 | 59.74 ± 11.36 | 32.84 ± 8.97 | 52.79 ± 8.74 | |
t value | 0.655 | 0.223 | 1.180 | 0.752 | ||
P value | 0.514 | 0.824 | 0.241 | 0.454 | ||
Post-intervention | Observation group | 50 | 46.54 ± 8.04 | 43.74 ± 9.68 | 24.67 ± 5.07 | 38.32 ± 7.52 |
Control group | 50 | 56.51 ± 9.54 | 54.40 ± 7.76 | 29.27 ± 6.82 | 46.73 ± 8.18 | |
t value | -5.651 | -6.076 | -3.828 | -5.352 | ||
P value | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of treatment compliance between the two groups [n (%)]
Group | n | Take the medicine as directed | Timely review |
Observation group | 50 | 38 (76.00) | 36 (72.00) |
Control group | 50 | 28 (56.00) | 22 (44.00) |
χ2 | 4.456 | 8.045 | |
P value | 0.034 | 0.004 |
Table 6 Comparison of nursing satisfaction between the two groups (mean ± SD, point)
Group | n | Comprehensive nursing knowledge | Nursing quality | Nursing responsibility |
Observation group | 50 | 91.20 ± 7.13 | 89.43 ± 5.10 | 87.48 ± 6.32 |
Control group | 50 | 83.31 ± 8.19 | 81.16 ± 6.38 | 81.23 ± 5.71 |
t value | 5.138 | 7.159 | 5.189 | |
P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Lin GQ, Ye ZQ, Song EL, Lin YN. Enhancing pediatric asthma management through multifaceted health education. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(19): 3708-3716
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v12/i19/3708.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i19.3708