Liang JJ, Feng WJ, Li R, Xu RT, Liang YL. Analysis of the value and safety of thyroid-stimulating hormone in the clinical efficacy of patients with thyroid cancer. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(5): 1058-1067 [PMID: 36874431 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i5.1058]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Yu-Long Liang, MM, Associate Chief Physician, Associate Professor, Department of General Surgery, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 139 Ziqiang Road, Qiaoxi District, Shijiazhuang 050051, Hebei Province, China. yulongliang2020@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Oncology
Article-Type of This Article
Observational Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Feb 16, 2023; 11(5): 1058-1067 Published online Feb 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i5.1058
Table 1 Comparison of general information of each group (mean ± SD)
Group
Gender
Age (yr)
BMI (kg/m2)
Male
Female
Control (n = 50)
22
28
53.25 ± 4.67
22.53 ± 3.67
Observation (n = 75)
38
37
51.34 ± 7.56
23.45 ± 4.23
χ2/t
0.584
1.594
1.255
P value
0.465
0.114
0.212
Table 2 Comparison of soluble interleukin-2 receptor, interleukin-17, and interleukin-35 levels in each group (mean ± SD)
Group
sIL-2R (U/mL)
IL-17 (pg/mL)
IL-35 (pg/mL)
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Control (n = 50)
546.78 ± 36.67
435.26 ± 26.47
15.67 ± 2.44
10.27 ± 2.32
56.59 ± 7.23
68.78 ± 6.34
Observation (n = 75)
545.56 ± 34.12
359.56 ± 21.98
14.78 ± 2.65
6.79 ± 2.78
57.67 ± 7.15
94.98 ± 6.78
t
0.190
17.370
1.898
7.313
0.061
21.716
P value
0.849
< 0.001
0.060
< 0.001
0.951
< 0.001
Table 3 Comparison of free triiodothyronine and free tetraiodothyronine levels in each group (mean ± SD)
Group
FT3 (ng/L)
FT4 (ng/L)
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Control (n = 50)
1.54 ± 0.23
2.23 ± 1.62
0.50 ± 0.16
0.89 ± 0.82
Observation (n = 75)
1.58 ± 0.27
3.12 ± 1.65
0.48 ± 0.11
1.56 ± 1.48
t
0.860
2.976
0.829
2.914
P value
0.392
0.004
0.409
0.004
Table 4 Levels of CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ in each group (mean ± SD)
Group
CD3+ (%)
CD4+ (%)
CD8+ (%)
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Control (n = 50)
53.56 ± 6.23
61.21 ± 6.32
25.87 ± 6.56
46.87 ± 6.76
39.98 ± 5.21
35.65 ± 9.67
Observation (n = 75)
52.45 ± 5.72
64.98 ± 6.56
26.78 ± 6.48
49.78 ± 5.65
41.34 ± 5.45
29.87 ± 9.87
t
1.026
3.194
0.765
2.606
1.391
3.233
P value
0.307
0.002
0.446
0.010
0.167
0.002
Table 5 Levels of CD44V6 and tumor supplied group of factor in each group (mean ± SD)
Group
CD44V6 (ng/mL)
TSGF (ng/mL)
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Control (n = 50)
512.45 ± 33.06
367.56 ± 24.67
74.35 ± 6.57
56.87 ± 5.76
Observation (n = 75)
513.52 ± 34.11
314.23 ± 20.12
72.78 ± 6.54
42.38 ± 5.21
t
0.174
12.719
1.312
14.600
P value
0.862
< 0.001
0.192
< 0.001
Table 6 Comparison of adverse reactions in each group, n (%)
Group
Rash
Osteoporosis
Recurrence
Overall incidence
Control (n = 50)
2 (4.00)
3 (6.00)
3 (6.00)
13 (26.00)
Observation (n = 75)
4 (5.33)
4 (5.33)
6 (8.00)
17 (22.67)
χ2
0.932
0.874
0.672
0.961
P value
0.733
0.812
0.944
0.111
Citation: Liang JJ, Feng WJ, Li R, Xu RT, Liang YL. Analysis of the value and safety of thyroid-stimulating hormone in the clinical efficacy of patients with thyroid cancer. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(5): 1058-1067