Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 26, 2023; 11(24): 5660-5665
Published online Aug 26, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i24.5660
Table 1 Demographics and clinical characteristics of patients undergoing laparoscopy-assisted versus conventional ileostomies, n (%)
CharacteristicsConventional group (n = 22)Laparoscopic group (n = 26)P value
Age, yr63.5 ± 8.461.4 ± 7.40.339
Sex  
Male 12 (54.5)16 (61.5)0.624
Female10 (45.4)10 (38.4)0.643
Body mass index, kg/m2 [median (IQR)]20.2 ± 3.220.8 ± 2.80.47
Mean ASA Class2.3 ± 4.92.3 ± 4.80.902
Comorbidities19 (86.4)23 (88.5)0.827
DM 11 (50)14 (53.8)0.790
Hypertension 15 (68.2)17 (65.4)0.838
CKD5 (22.7)7 (26.9)0.738
Hypothyroidism 0 (0)2 (7.7)0.184
Cardiac disease 2 (9.1)2 (7.7)0.861
Smoking2 (9.1)4 (15.4)0.511
Drinking8 (36.4)12 (46.2)0.493
Table 2 Operative characteristics of patients undergoing laparoscopy-assisted versus conventional ileostomies, n (%)
Operative characteristicsConventional group (n = 22)Laparoscopic group (n = 26)P value
Operative time (min, SD)50.1 ± 20.461.5 ± 19.50.054
Estimated blood loss (mL, SD)27.3 ± 14.930.0 ± 18.10.576
Adhesion lysis performed9 (40.9)11 (42.3)0.922
Adhesion lysis duration (min, SD)11.0 ± 4.322.2±5.6< 0.001
The largest incision length5.5 ± 0.74.1 ± 0.8< 0.001
Intraoperative 330.490
complication
Bleeding01 (3.8)
Bowel injury1 (4.5)2 (7.7)
Bladder injury2 (9)0
Vessel injury00
Others00
Table 3 Postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopy-assisted versus conventional ileostomy, n (%)
Postoperative outcomesConventional group (n = 22)Laparoscopic group (n = 26)P value
Visual Analogue Scale score3.61 ± 0.93.0 ± 0.90.046
Length of stay (d, mean ± SD)13.3 ± 13.49.3 ± 4.60.21
Complications3 (13.6)1 (3.8)0.42
UTI00
Pneumonia1 (4.5)0
Wound infection2 (9)1 (3.8)
Leakage00
Ileus (over 5 d)00
Bleeding0 0
Incision hernia00
Reversal time (wk)10.7 ± 4.49.2 ± 4.10.226