Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 26, 2023; 11(24): 5660-5665
Published online Aug 26, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i24.5660
Benefits of laparoscopy-assisted ileostomy in colorectal cancer patients with bowel obstruction
Yi-Jie Wang, Kuan-Hsun Lin, Jung-Cheng Kang, Je-Ming Hu, Chao-Yang Chen, Ta-Wei Pu
Yi-Jie Wang, Department of Surgery, Tri Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan
Kuan-Hsun Lin, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan
Jung-Cheng Kang, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei 105, Taiwan
Je-Ming Hu, Chao-Yang Chen, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan
Ta-Wei Pu, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Songshan branch, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 105, Taiwan
Author contributions: Wang YJ contributed to this work; Wang YJ, Lin KH, Kang JC, Hu JM, Chen CY, Pu TW designed the research study; Wang YJ, Kang JC and Pu TW performed the research; Wang YJ and Lin KH contributed new reagents and analytic tools; Wang YJ, Lin KH and Pu TW analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; all authors have read and approve the final manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: The study was reviewed and approved by the Taiwan Adventist Hospital Institutional Review Board, Approval No. 2023E01.
Informed consent statement: The requirement for informed consent was waived by the institutional review board of our hospital due to the retrospective nature of the study, and patient information was anonymized and de-identified prior to analysis.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors have nothing to disclose.
Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.
STROBE statement: The authors have read the STROBE Statement—checklist of items, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the STROBE Statement—checklist of items.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Ta-Wei Pu, MD, Lecturer, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Songshan branch, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, No. 131 Jiankang Road, Taipei 105, Taiwan. tawei0131@gmail.com
Received: June 13, 2023
Peer-review started: June 13, 2023
First decision: July 7, 2023
Revised: July 13, 2023
Accepted: July 25, 2023
Article in press: July 25, 2023
Published online: August 26, 2023
Processing time: 72 Days and 21.3 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Ileostomies are commonly performed after colon and rectal surgeries. Laparoscopy-assisted ileostomy with adhesion lysis may have potential benefits over conventional open surgery.

AIM

To compare the outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted and conventional ileostomies.

METHODS

Data from 48 consecutive patients who underwent ileostomy at our institution between May 2021 and May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The groups comprised 26 and 22 patients who underwent laparoscopic ileostomy (laparoscopic group) and conventional ileostomy (conventional group), respectively, performed by a single surgeon. Patient demographics, operative characteristics, postoperative outcomes, and 30-d morbidities and mortality rates were analyzed.

RESULTS

The two groups had comparable mean ages, sex distributions, American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, and body mass indices. However, the laparoscopic group showed similar operative time, better visualization for adhesion lysis, and lower visual analog scale scores than the conventional group.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopy-assisted ileostomy is a safe and efficient method that produces lower visual analog scale scores, better intraoperative visualization for effective adhesion lysis, and similar operative time compared with conventional ileostomy.

Keywords: Laparoscopy; Ileostomy; Colorectal cancer; Bowel obstruction; Tissue adhesion; Retrospective study

Core Tip: Laparoscopy-assisted ileostomy is a novel, safe, and efficient method for managing bowel obstruction in patients with colorectal cancer. Compared with conventional ileostomy, this method results in lower visual analog scale scores and better intraoperative visualization for effective adhesion lysis without extending the operative time.