Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. May 16, 2023; 11(14): 3158-3166
Published online May 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i14.3158
Published online May 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i14.3158
Clinicopathological features | UCH-L1 (pg/mL) | GFAP (ng/L) |
Gender | ||
Male (n = 49) | 95.89 ± 16.79 | 16.58 ± 2.14 |
Female (n = 42) | 98.05 ± 17.69 | 16.82 ± 2.20 |
t value | 0.597 | 0.515 |
P value | 0.552 | 0.608 |
Age (yr) | ||
< 40 (n = 44) | 99.78 ± 18.42 | 17.03 ± 2.29 |
≥ 40 (n = 47) | 94.19 ± 15.58 | 16.37 ± 2.01 |
t value | 1.566 | 1.483 |
P value | 0.121 | 0.141 |
Pathological type | ||
Glioblastoma (n = 76) | 98.12 ± 17.14 | 16.84 ± 2.16 |
Medulloblastoma (n = 15) | 90.65 ± 16.35 | 15.92 ± 2.04 |
t value | 1.554 | 1.512 |
P value | 0.124 | 0.134 |
Tumor location | ||
Frontal lobe (n = 41) | 95.28 ± 16.24 | 16.50 ± 2.09 |
Temporal lobe (n = 39) | 99.14 ± 17.59 | 16.97 ± 2.21 |
Other locations (n = 11) | 94.93 ± 19.56 | 16.39 ± 2.29 |
F value | 0.582 | 0.592 |
P value | 0.561 | 0.555 |
Tumor grade | ||
WHO I-II grade (n = 33) | 78.89 ± 5.05 | 14.39 ± 0.84 |
WHO III-IV grade (n = 58) | 107.13 ± 12.48 | 18.01 ± 1.47 |
t value | 12.402 | 12.900 |
P value | < 0.000 | < 0.001 |
Tumor diameter | ||
≤ 5 cm (n = 19) | 75.23 ± 3.04 | 13.80 ± 0.59 |
> 5 cm (n = 72) | 102.61 ± 14.55 | 17.45 ± 1.73 |
t value | 8.123 | 9.006 |
P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Number of lesions | ||
Single (n = 70) | 97.57 ± 17.70 | 16.77 ± 2.25 |
Multiple (n = 21) | 94.63 ± 15.37 | 16.43 ± 1.84 |
t value | 0.685 | 0.619 |
P value | 0.495 | 0.537 |
Time | UCH-L1 (pg/mL) | GFAP (ng/L) |
Recurrence group (n = 22) | ||
Preoperative | 120.44 ± 6.41 | 19.59 ± 0.57 |
3 d after surgery | 88.01 ± 2.44 | 10.00 ± 0.46 |
t value | 37.398 | 289.806 |
P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Non-recurrence group (n = 69) | ||
Preoperative | 89.38 ± 11.83 | 15.76 ± 1.58 |
3 d after surgery | 67.09 ± 9.60 | 6.74 ± 1.16 |
t value | 78.571 | 172.100 |
P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Preoperative comparison of the two groups | ||
t value | 11.749 | 11.118 |
P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Comparison of the two groups at 3 d after surgery | ||
t value | 10.086 | 12.791 |
P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Indicator | Critical value | AUC | 95%CI | P value | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
Preoperative UCH-L1 | 103.85 | 0.785 | 0.670-0.901 | < 0.001 | 68.2 | 81.2 |
3 d after surgery UCH-L1 | 85.61 | 0.646 | 0.507-0.785 | 0.040 | 63.6 | 62.3 |
Preoperative GFAP | 18.70 | 0.775 | 0.651-0.898 | < 0.001 | 63.6 | 88.4 |
3 d after surgery GFAP | 8.58 | 0.648 | 0.508-0.787 | 0.038 | 59.1 | 75.4 |
- Citation: Zhu QH, Wu JK, Hou GL. Changes and significance of serum ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 and glial fibrillary acidic protein in patients with glioma. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(14): 3158-3166
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i14/3158.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i14.3158