Effectiveness of the combination of workshops and flipped classroom model to improve tube fixation training for nursing students

Table 1 Characteristics of the nurses who joined our hospital in 2018 and 2019

Characteristics	Control group (n = 159)	Experimental group (n = 149)	P value
Age, years (mean ± SD)	22.94 ± 0.94	25.42 ± 3.23	< 0.01
Sex (male/female), n (%)	17/142 (10.69/89.31)	21/128 (14.09/85.91)	0.36
Education background, n
Masters/Undergraduate	1/158 (0.63/99.37)	2/147 (1.34/98.66)	0.52

Table 2 Comparison of the training assessment and satisfaction of the nurses who joined our hospital in 2018 and 2019

Characteristics	Control group (n = 159)	Experimental group (n = 149)	P value
Assessment scoring (mean ± SD)	84.24 ± 2.94	94.01 ± 2.78	< 0.01
Evaluation scoring (mean ± SD)	4.67 ± 0.64	4.88 ± 0.38	< 0.01
Number of up-to-standard patients, n (%)	146 (91.82)	149 (100.00)	< 0.01

Table 3 Evaluation of the workshop combined with flipped classroom training model by nurses who joined our hospital in 2019 (n = 149)

Items	Score (mean ± SD)	Completely agree (%)	Mostly agree (%)	Basically agree (%)	Not agree (%)
Good for cultivating clinical thinking	4.50 ± 0.68	89 (59.73)	46 (30.87)	13 (8.72)	1 (0.67)
Good for cultivating independent learning ability	4.56 ± 0.62	93 (62.41)	48 (32.21)	7 (4.69)	1 (0.67)
Good for mastering knowledge	4.52 ± 0.76	99 (66.44)	32 (21.47)	15 (10.06)	3 (2.01)

Table 4 Evaluation of the workshop combined with flipped classroom training content by nurses who joined our hospital in 2019 (n = 149)

Item	Score (mean ± SD)	Great (%)	Good (%)	General (%)	Bad (%)	Terrible (%)
Pre-class teaching video	4.28 ± 0.89	78 (52.35)	42 (28.19)	23 (15.44)	5 (3.36)	1 (0.67)
Pre-class tube atlas	4.68 ± 0.54	108 (72.48)	35 (23.49)	6 (4.03)	0	0
Pre-class main instructor guidance	4.51 ± 0.65	88 (59.06)	52 (34.90)	7 (4.70)	2 (1.34)	0
In-class demonstration	4.87 ± 0.37	132 (88.59)	15 (10.07)	2 (1.34)	0	0
In-class practice	4.84 ± 0.39	126 (84.56)	22 (14.77)	1 (0.67)	0	0