Zheng XC, Luo TT, Cao DD, Cai WZ. Effect of precise nursing service mode on postoperative urinary incontinence prevention in patients with prostate disease. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(5): 1517-1526 [PMID: 35211589 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i5.1517]
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Feb 16, 2022; 10(5): 1517-1526 Published online Feb 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i5.1517
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data between the two groups, n (%)
Parameters
Control group (n = 65)
Observation group (n = 65)
χ2/t
P value
Age (yr)
63.12 ± 12.05
62.85 ± 11.54
0.130
0.896
Course of disease (yr)
12.24 ± 3.02
12.31 ± 2.84
0.136
0.892
IPSS score
30.56 ± 4.63
31.02 ± 4.81
0.555
0.580
Prostate volume (mL)
45.96 ± 7.86
46.21 ± 7.37
0.187
0.852
Rectal digital examination
II degree
36 (55.38)
41 (63.08)
0.796
0.372
III degree
29 (44.62)
24 (36.92)
Basic diseases
Bladder stones
24 (36.92)
19 (29.23)
0.869
0.351
Hypertension
36 (55.38)
39 (60.00)
0.284
0.594
Diabetes
18 (27.69)
20 (30.77)
0.149
0.700
Coronary heart disease
27 (41.54)
22 (33.85)
0.819
0.366
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
25 (38.46)
23 (35.38)
0.132
0.716
Table 2 Comparison of postoperative outcomes between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Group
Number of cases
Postoperative exhaust time (h)
Time of indwelling catheter (d)
Hospitalization time (d)
Control group
65
24.63 ± 4.51
5.63 ± 1.24
10.23 ± 2.28
Observation Group
65
18.65 ± 3.23
4.85 ± 1.08
8.78 ± 2.03
t
8.691
3.824
3.829
P value
0.000
0.000
0.000
Table 3 Comparison of urinary flow mechanics index, international prostate system score and incontinence quality of life questionnaire score in the two groups (mean ± SD)
Table 4 Comparison of complications between two groups, n (%)
Group
Number of cases
Urethral orifice injury
Bladder spasm
Secondary bleeding
Control group
65
2 (3.08)
1 (1.54)
3 (4.62)
Observation group
65
1 (1.54)
0 (0.00)
1 (1.54)
χ2
0.341
1.008
1.032
P value
0.559
0.315
0.310
Table 5 Comparison of urinary incontinence between two groups, n (%)
Group
Number of cases
Urinary incontinence
Duration of urinary incontinence
Mild
Moderate
Severe
Total
< 1 wk
1 wk-4 wk
> 4 wk
Control group
65
10 (40.00)
11 (44.00)
4 (16.00)
25 (38.46)
13 (52.00)
8 (32.00)
4 (16.00)
Observation group
65
7 (50.00)
5 (35.71)
2 (14.29)
14 (21.54)
9 (64.29)
5 (35.71)
0 (0.00)
χ2
4.322
2.517
P value
0.035
0.284
Citation: Zheng XC, Luo TT, Cao DD, Cai WZ. Effect of precise nursing service mode on postoperative urinary incontinence prevention in patients with prostate disease. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(5): 1517-1526