Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 26, 2022; 10(27): 9650-9656
Published online Sep 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i27.9650
Table 1 Efficacy of the two treatment approaches, n (%)
Groups
CR
PR
SD
PD
Clinical efficacy, %
Disease control rate, %
Observation group, n = 307 (23.33)15 (50.00)6 (20.00)2 (6.67)73.3393.33
Control group, n = 305 (16.67)11 (36.67)8 (26.67)6 (20.00)53.3380.00
χ2 value15.5215.660
P value0.0010.041
Table 2 Comparison of alpha-fetoprotein between the two groups before and after the treatment (mean ± SD, ng/mL)
Groups
Before the treatment
After the treatment
Observation group, n = 30621.07 ± 154.76289.06 ± 76.21
Control group, n = 30609.76 ± 145.69365.01 ± 73.11
t value1.0246.843
P value0.2370.034
Table 3 Incidence of adverse reactions in the two groups after the treatment, n (%)
Groups
Nausea and vomiting
Pain
Fever
Observation group, n = 309 (30.00)21 (70.00)11 (36.67)
Control group, n = 3019 (63.33)22 (73.33)12 (40.00)
χ2 value6.4210.2450.312
P value0.0350.5430.564