Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 16, 2022; 10(26): 9241-9253
Published online Sep 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i26.9241
Table 1 Revised Seattle, Baltimore, and European Society for bone marrow transplantation diagnostic criteria for hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome
Standard
Definition
Revised Seattle standardAt least two of the following manifestations occurred within 20 d after HSCT: Bilirubin > 2 mg/dL, hepatomegaly with right upper abdominal pain, fluid retention, and weight gain ≥ 2% of baseline weight
Baltimore standardAt least two of the following manifestations occurred within 21 d after HSCT: Bilirubin > 2 mg/dL, hepatomegaly with right upper abdominal pain, fluid retention, and weight gain ≥ 5% of baseline weight
EBMT standardClassic SOS: Bilirubin > 2 mg/dL within 21 d after HSCT, and at least two of the following manifestations are met: painful hepatomegaly, weight gain ≥ 5%, ascites
Delayed type of SOS: 21 d after HSCT, there was classical SOS or SOS confirmed by pathology, or ≥ 2 classical criteria with ultrasonic or hemodynamic evidence
Table 2 New European society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria for severity grading of a suspected sinusoidal obstruction syndrome in adults

Mild
Moderate
Severe
Very severe - MOD/MOF
Time since first clinical symptoms of SOS/VOD> 7 d5-7 d≤ 4 dAny time
Bilirubin (mg/dL)≥ 2 and < 3≥ 3 and < 5≥ 5 and < 8≥ 8
Bilirubin (μmol/L)≥ 34 and < 51≥ 51 and < 85≥ 85 and < 136≥ 136
Bilirubin kineticsDoubling within 48 h
Transaminases≤ 2 ULN> 2 and ≤ 5 ULN> 5 and ≤ 8 ULN> 8 ULN
Weight increase< 5%≥ 5% and < 10%≥ 5% and < 10%≥ 10%
Renal function< 1.2 × baseline at transplant≥ 1.2 and < 1.5 × baseline at transplant≥ 1.5 and < 2 × baseline at transplant≥ 2 × baseline at transplant
Table 3 Liver stiffness measurement allows early diagnosis of veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome in patients who undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Country
Year
Study design
Age
HSCT patients (n)
SOS patients (n)
LSM method
LSM (baseline)
LSM (peak)
AUC
Sensitivity
Specificity
Ref.
Italy2019ProspectiveAdult784FibroScan3.7-8.815-34.30.99775%98.70%Colecchia et al[86]
Italy2016RetrospectiveChildren224FibroScan4-612-20Colecchia et al[87]
Italy2022ProspectiveAdult212FibroScan6.7> 21 kPaRavaioli et al[85]
Turkey2022Prospective61 yr, 65 yr312FibroScan8.255, 17.70.569100%55.17%Özkan et al[92]
United States2017ProspectiveAdult255SWE0.02 ± 0.18 m/s0.25 ± 0.21 m/s0.776280%67%Reddivalla et al[84]
France2021RetrospectiveAdult14662D-SWE> 8.1 kPa0.8475%99%Debureauxet al[93]
Spain2011RetrospectiveAdult2ARFI2.75 m/s, 2.58 m/sFontanilla et al[79]
Italy2019RetrospectiveChildren-3FibroScan2.8-4.634.3-36---Zama et al[94]