Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 26, 2022; 10(24): 8599-8614
Published online Aug 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i24.8599
Published online Aug 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i24.8599
Table 1 Study schedule of enrollment, intervention, and assessment
Enrollment | Pre-allocation | Allocation | Post-intervention | |
Duration | 12 wk | 1 wk | 12 wk | |
Eligibility | x | |||
Informed consent | x | |||
Clinical interview | x | x | ||
Demographic question | x | |||
Intervention | ||||
Unified protocol | - | |||
Treatment as usual | - | |||
Primary outcome | ||||
OASIS | x | x | ||
ODSIS | x | x | ||
Secondary outcomes | ||||
DERS | x | x | ||
ESQ | x | x | ||
PANAS | x | x |
Table 2 Content and the number of sessions for each module
Module | Schedule | Content and the number of sessions for each module |
One1 | Week 1 | Setting goals and maintaining motivation (1 session) |
Two1 | Week 2 | Understanding emotions (1 sessions) |
Three2 | Week 3 and 41 | Mindful emotion awareness (2 sessions) |
Four2 | Week 5 | Cognitive flexibility (2 sessions) |
Five2 | Week 6 | Countering emotional behaviors (1 sessions) |
Six2 | Week 7 | Understanding and confronting physical sensations (1 session) |
Seven2 | Weeks 8 to 11 | Emotion exposures (5 sessions) |
Eight3 | Week 12 | Recognizing accomplishments and looking to the future (1 session) |
Table 3 Demographic characteristics of the sample, n = 102
Item characteristic | Baseline value | Control group value | UP group value | Test | P value |
Categorical variables | |||||
Sex, n (%) | |||||
Women | 48 (47.1) | 21 | 27 | χ² = 0.35 | 0.55 |
Man | 54 (52.9) | 30 | 24 | ||
Principal diagnosis, n (%) | |||||
Depressive disorder | 45 (44.1) | 22 | 23 | χ² = 1.41 | 0.23 |
Anxiety disorder | 57 (55.9) | 26 | 31 | ||
Marital status, n (%) | |||||
Single | 34 (33.3) | 20 | 14 | χ² = 11.33 | 0.001 |
In relationship | 68 (66.7) | 35 | 33 | ||
Psychological disorders, n (%) | |||||
MDD | 40 (48.6) | 18 | 22 | ||
Dysthymia | 5 (7.1) | 4 | 1 | ||
GAD | 34 (31.4) | 15 | 19 | ||
SAD | 23 (12.9) | 11 | 12 | ||
Continues variables (mean ± SD) | |||||
Age, yr | 28.07 ± 5.07 | 27.92 ± 4.67 | 28.18 ± 5.49 | t(100) = 0.28 | 0.77 |
Anxiety | 11.14 ± 1.88 | 11.35 ± 2.05 | 10.88 ± 1.69 | t(100) = 1.26 | 0.21 |
Depression | 10.97 ± 3.75 | 11.24 ± 1.75 | 10.71 ± 1.70 | t(100) = 1.09 | 0.26 |
Emotion dysregulation | 49.69 ± 7.82 | 49.08 ± 7.10 | 50.18 ± 8.04 | t(100) = 0.80 | 0.4 |
Positive affect | 26.49 ± 3.80 | 26.88 ± 3.92 | 26.10 ± 3.66 | t(100) = 1.05 | 0.29 |
Negative affect | 27.44 ± 3.42 | 26.59 ± 3.66 | 27.74 ± 3.01 | t(100) = 1.48 | 0.14 |
Healthy emotionality | 59.84 ± 8.82 | 60.33 ± 9.46 | 58.90 ± 11.35 | t(100) = 1.67 | 0.09 |
Table 4 Analysis of covariance at Time 2 to compare the unified protocol with treatment as usual
Measure | Condition | Adjusted mean | Levene’s test | ANCOVA | |||||
TAU | UP | F (1, 100) | Sig | F (1, 99) | P value | η2p | R2 | ||
Anxiety | |||||||||
Time 2 | 11.81 | 7.98 | 3.67 | 0.058 | 28.77 | < 0.001 | 0.22 | 0.23 | |
Depression | |||||||||
Time 2 | 12.11 | 8.03 | 3.43 | 0.07 | 62.02 | < 0.001 | 0.38 | 0.37 | |
Emotion dysregulation | |||||||||
Time 2 | 52.44 | 48.06 | 2.34 | 0.12 | 6.57 | 0.012 | .06 | 0.07 | |
Positive affect | |||||||||
Time 2 | 26.72 | 33.14 | 0.12 | 0.68 | 40.75 | < 0.001 | 0.29 | 0.30 | |
Negative affect | |||||||||
Time 2 | 27.01 | 23.28 | 1.87 | 0.17 | 21.35 | < 0.001 | 0.18 | 0.16 | |
Healthy emotionality | |||||||||
Time 2 | 58.83 | 65.68 | 0.19 | 0.68 | 12.90 | 0.001 | 0.12 | 0.14 |
Table 5 Control group and intervention group
Measure | Control group (TAU), n= 51 | Intervention group (UP), n= 51 | ||
Time 1 | Time 1I | Time 1 | Time 1I | |
Anxiety | 11.35 ± 2.05 | 11.75 ± 2.42 | 10.88 ± 1.69 | 8.54 ± 2.83 |
Depression | 11.24 ± 1.75 | 12.08 ± 2.16 | 10.71 ± 1.70 | 8.14 ± 3.03 |
Emotion difficulties | 49.07 ± 7.32 | 50.31 ± 8.40 | 50.18 ± 8.04 | 47.33 ± 9.41 |
Positive affect | 26.88 ± 3.92 | 26.99 ± 4.22 | 26.10 ± 3.66 | 31.97 ± 3.59 |
Negative affect | 26.59 ± 3.66 | 27.89 ± 3.74 | 27.74 ± 3.01 | 23.31 ± 4.92 |
Healthy emotionality | 60.33 ± 9.46 | 59.47 ± 10.41 | 58.90 ± 11.35 | 65.12 ± 10.76 |
Table 6 Paired t-test and within-group effect size at post-intervention
Item | Treatment as usual group | Unified protocol group | |||
t(50) | P value | t(50) | P value | Cohen’s d | |
Anxiety | 0.88 | 0.37 | 6.13 | < 0.001 | 0.81 |
Depression | -1.89 | 0.06 | 4.38 | < 0.001 | 0.75 |
Emotion difficulties | -0.98 | 0.33 | 5.45 | < 0.001 | 0.54 |
Positive affect | 0.12 | 0.8 | -7.92 | < 0.001 | 1.39 |
Negative affect | -0.36 | 0.72 | 4.43 | < 0.001 | 0.83 |
Healthy emotionality | 0.53 | 0.6 | -2.16 | 0.03 | 0.39 |
- Citation: Yan K, Yusufi MH, Nazari N. Application of unified protocol as a transdiagnostic treatment for emotional disorders during COVID-19: An internet-delivered randomized controlled trial. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(24): 8599-8614
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i24/8599.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i24.8599