Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 26, 2022; 10(24): 8547-8555
Published online Aug 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i24.8547
Published online Aug 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i24.8547
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data between the two groups of patients, n (%)
Normal information | Research group (n = 44) | Control group (n = 44) | t/χ2 value | P value |
Age (yr) | 60.6 ± 5.0 | 61.3 ± 5.5 | -0.625 | 0.534 |
Lesion diameter (cm) | 5.18 ± 1.00 | 5.08 ± 1.30 | 0.404 | 0.687 |
Serum AFP (ng/L) | 240.8 ± 75.6 | 228.6 ± 66.3 | 0.805 | 0.423 |
Sex | 0.733 | 0.392 | ||
Male | 26 (59.09) | 22 (50.00) | ||
Female | 18 (40.91) | 22 (50.00) | ||
Child-Pugh stage | 1.252 | 0.263 | ||
A stage | 40 (100) | 37 (84.09) | ||
B stage | 4 (9.09) | 7 (15.91) | ||
Hepatitis B virus infection | 1.286 | 0.257 | ||
Yes | 32 (72.73) | 27 (61.36) | ||
No | 12 (27.27) | 17 (38.64) | ||
Surgical resection range | 0.786 | 0.375 | ||
≥ 3 liver segments | 18 (40.91) | 14 (31.82) | ||
< 3 liver segments | 26 (59.09) | 30 (68.18) |
Table 2 Comparison of surgical process indicators between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Index | Research group (n = 44) | Control group (n = 44) | t value | P value |
Operation time (min) | 273.0 ± 24.8 | 256.3 ± 28.5 | 2.932 | 0.004 |
Incision length (cm) | 25.98 ± 1.55 | 26.14 ± 1.64 | -0.470 | 0.639 |
Surgical bleeding (mL) | 626.9 ± 105.1 | 598.4 ± 97.0 | 1.322 | 0.190 |
Portal block time (min) | 25.3 ± 4.1 | 23.5 ± 4.5 | 1.961 | 0.053 |
Postoperative anal exhaust time (h) | 50.0 ± 9.7 | 55.1 ± 10.4 | -2.379 | 0.020 |
Drainage tube indwelling time (d) | 3.84 ± 0.66 | 3.62 ± 0.71 | 1.505 | 0.136 |
Hospital stay (d) | 13.6 ± 1.8 | 14.0 ± 2.2 | -0.933 | 0.353 |
Table 3 Comparison of liver function indexes between the two groups of patients (mean ± SD)
Index | Research group (n = 44) | Control group (n = 44) | t value | P value |
ALT (U/L) | ||||
Preoperative | 33.04 ± 8.56 | 34.72 ± 8.11 | -0.945 | 0.347 |
24 h after operation | 378.61 ± 77.49a | 430.58 ± 83.67a | -3.023 | 0.003 |
72 h after operation | 246.13 ± 54.06a | 281.35 ± 59.61a | -2.903 | 0.005 |
AST (U/L) | ||||
Preoperative | 29.61 ± 7.21 | 27.30 ± 7.85 | 1.438 | 0.154 |
24 h after operation | 355.30 ± 69.50a | 416.49 ± 73.03a | -4.026 | 0.000 |
72 h after operation | 223.47 ± 48.64a | 248.62 ± 50.10a | -2.389 | 0.019 |
TBIL (μmol/L) | ||||
Preoperative | 15.92 ± 4.40 | 15.28 ± 4.71 | 0.659 | 0.512 |
24 h after operation | 32.85 ± 7.01a | 34.06 ± 8.43a | -0.732 | 0.466 |
72 h after operation | 20.46 ± 5.83a | 22.90 ± 6.15a | -1.910 | 0.059 |
PA (mg/dL) | ||||
Preoperative | 313.86 ± 46.91 | 320.74 ± 51.67 | -0.654 | 0.515 |
24 h after operation | 194.82 ± 32.65a | 188.57 ± 29.48a | 0.942 | 0.349 |
72 h after operation | 275.12 ± 41.81a | 269.84 ± 46.10a | 0.563 | 0.575 |
Table 4 Comparison of tumor marker levels between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Index | Research group (n = 44) | Control group (n = 44) | t value | P value |
AFU (U/L) | ||||
Preoperative | 66.41 ± 9.51 | 68.18 ± 10.84 | -0.814 | 0.418 |
1 mo after operation | 27.04 ± 6.44a | 29.95 ± 8.27a | -1.842 | 0.069 |
AFP (ng/L) | ||||
Preoperative | 240.8 ± 75.6 | 228.6 ± 66.3 | 0.805 | 0.423 |
1 mo after operation | 78.55 ± 18.04a | 82.01 ± 20.63a | -0.837 | 0.405 |
CEA (μg/L) | ||||
Preoperative | 18.58 ± 4.20 | 20.03 ± 4.81 | -1.506 | 0.136 |
1 mo after operation | 3.77 ± 0.89a | 4.01 ± 0.81a | -1.323 | 0.189 |
Table 5 Comparison of inflammatory factors between the two groups of patients before and after surgery (mean ± SD)
Index | Research group (n = 44) | Control group (n = 44) | t value | P value |
IL-6 (pg/mL) | ||||
Preoperative | 54.23 ± 9.50 | 56.39 ± 9.11 | -1.089 | 0.279 |
24 h after operation | 97.41 ± 17.59 | 108.26 ± 18.25 | -2.839 | 0.006 |
72 h after operation | 70.55 ± 13.02 | 74.18 ± 14.40 | -1.240 | 0.218 |
TNF-α (pg/mL) | ||||
Preoperative | 68.33 ± 13.20 | 70.53 ± 12.65 | -0.798 | 0.427 |
24 h after operation | 148.12 ± 21.04 | 167.00 ± 24.28 | -3.898 | 0.000 |
72 h after operation | 98.40 ± 13.27 | 102.73 ± 15.19 | -1.424 | 0.158 |
CRP (mg/L) | ||||
Preoperative | 4.91 ± 1.53 | 5.34 ± 1.58 | -1.297 | 0.198 |
24 h after operation | 18.48 ± 3.75 | 20.14 ± 4.43 | -1.897 | 0.061 |
72 h after operation | 14.20 ± 3.36 | 15.38 ± 4.28 | -1.438 | 0.154 |
- Citation: Liu D, Fang JM, Chen XQ. Clinical significance of half-hepatic blood flow occlusion technology in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with cirrhosis. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(24): 8547-8555
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i24/8547.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i24.8547