Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 6, 2022; 10(22): 7698-7707
Published online Aug 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i22.7698
Published online Aug 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i22.7698
Table 1 Demographic characteristics of patients who underwent surgery for hemorrhoidectomy-associated anal stenosis
Scar revision surgery | Double diamond-shaped flap anoplasty | P value | Total | |
Patient numbers | 21 (35%) | 39 (65%) | 60 | |
Age (yr) | 54 ± 14.5 | 55 ± 11.8 | 0.773 | 54.65 ±12.65 |
Sex (male/female) | 13/8 (61.9%/38.09%) | 23/16 (58.97%/41.03%) | 0.825 | 36/24 (60%/40%) |
Preoperative severity of anal stenosis | < 0.001 | |||
Mild | 17 (80.95%) | 12 (30.77%) | 29 (48.33%) | |
Moderate | 4 (19.05%) | 16 (41.03%) | 20 (33.33%) | |
Severe | 0 | 11 (28.21%) | 11 (18.33%) | |
Preoperative symptoms | ||||
Strained defecation | 21 (100%) | 39 (100%) | - | 60 (100%) |
Incomplete evacuation | 13 (61.9%) | 26 (66.67%) | 0.712 | 39 (65%) |
Painful evacuation | 4 (19.04%) | 25 (64.1%) | 0.001 | 29 (48.33%) |
Defecation bleeding | 0 | 8 (20.51%) | 0.026 | 8 (13.33%) |
Incontinence | 0 | 7 (17.95%) | 0.039 | 7 (11.67%) |
Adjuvant therapy | ||||
Laxative medication | 21 (100%) | 39 (100%) | - | 60 (100%) |
Pain control medication | 4 (19.05%) | 25 (64.1%) | 0.001 | 29 (48.33%) |
Digital dilatation | 7 (33.33%) | 17 (43.59%) | 0.439 | 24 (40%) |
Table 2 Surgical outcomes of patients treated surgically for anal stenosis
Patient numbers | 21 (35%) | 39 (65%) | 60 | |
Operative time (min) | 10.14 ± 2.31 | 21.62 ± 4.68 | < 0.001 | 17.6 ± 6.8 |
Length of hospital stay (d) | 2.1 ± 0.3 | 2.9 ± 0.4 | < 0.001 | 2.62 ± 0.52 |
Complications | ||||
Acute urinary retention | 0 | 4 (10.3%) | - | 4 (6.7%) |
Wound dehiscence | 0 | 0 | 0.129 | 0 |
Wound infection | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Postoperative fever | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Postoperative bleeding | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Table 3 Postoperative 6-mo follow-up
Scar revision surgery | Double-diamond-shaped flap anoplasty | P value | Total | |
Patient numbers | 21 (35%) | 39 (65%) | 60 | |
Postoperative symptoms | - | |||
Strained defecation | 2 (9.52%) | 0 | 0.05 | 2 (3.33%) |
Incomplete evacuation | 1 (4.76%) | 0 | 0.169 | 1 (1.67%) |
Painful evacuation | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Defecation bleeding | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Incontinence | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Adjuvant therapy | ||||
Laxative medication | 2 (9.52%) | 0 | - | 2 |
Pain control medication | 0 | 0 | 0.05 | 0 |
Digital dilatation | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Recurrence | 2 (9.52%) | 0 | 0.05 | 2 (3.33%) |
Quality of life | 0.035 | |||
Poor (1–2) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Same (3–5) | 2 (9.52%) | 0 | 2 (3.33%) | |
Good (6–7) | 6 (28.57%) | 7 (17.95%) | 13 (21.67%) | |
Excellent (8–10) | 13 (61.90%) | 32 (82.05%) | 45 (75%) |
- Citation: Weng YT, Chu KJ, Lin KH, Chang CK, Kang JC, Chen CY, Hu JM, Pu TW. Is anoplasty superior to scar revision surgery for post-hemorrhoidectomy anal stenosis? Six years of experience. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(22): 7698-7707
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i22/7698.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i22.7698