Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 26, 2022; 10(21): 7376-7385
Published online Jul 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7376
Published online Jul 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7376
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data among the three groups
Variable | D group (n = 125) | DS group (n = 126) | S group (n = 126) | P |
Sex (male), n (%) | 119 (95.2) | 117 (92.9) | 118 (93.7) | 0.85 |
Age (yr) | 12.62 ± 1.88 | 13.07 ± 2.24 | 12.60 ± 1.78 | 0.26 |
Body weight (kg) | 83.9 ± 2.02 | 84.1 ± 1.96 | 84.1 ± 1.99 | 0.83 |
Blood pressure (mmHg) | 49.3 ± 3.64 | 49.3 ± 3.39 | 49.3 ± 3.44 | 0.98 |
Respiration (times/min) | 24.5 ± 2.01 | 24.1 ± 1.97 | 24.6 ± 1.87 | 0.21 |
Heart rate (beats/min) | 113.2 ± 5.03 | 112.4 ± 5.16 | 113.2 ± 4.79 | 0.37 |
FLACC score (points) | 5.0 ± 0.48 | 5.0 ± 0.52 | 4.9 ± 0.52 | 0.30 |
PAED score (points) | 10.0 ± 1.00 | 9.9 ± 1.42 | 9.8 ± 1.00 | 0.22 |
Ramsay score (points) | 1.2 ± 0.37 | 1.2 ± 0.39 | 1.2 ± 0.37 | 0.80 |
CPS score (points) | 3.0 ± 0.53 | 3.0 ± 0.56 | 2.9 ± 0.48 | 0.81 |
Table 2 Comparison of Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability pain score of children at different time points among the three groups
Time | D group (n = 125) | DS group (n = 126) | S group (n = 126) | P |
Postoperative 2 h | 3.6 ± 0.63 | 3.4 ± 0.72 | 3.4 ± 0.76 | 0.143 |
Postoperative 2 h (≤ 3), n (%) | 48 (38.4) | 59 (46.8) | 58 (46.0) | 0.332 |
Postoperative 4 h | 1.9 ± 0.64 | 1.9 ± 0.70 | 1.8 ± 0.76 | 0.558 |
Postoperative 6 h | 0.1 ± 0.45 | 0.2 ± 0.53 | 0.2 ± 0.57 | 0.350 |
Postoperative 8 h | 0.0 ± 0.18 | 0.0 ± 0.00 | 0.0 ± 0.35 | 0.608 |
Postoperative 12 h | 0.0 ± 0.18 | 0.0 ± 0.00 | 0.0 ± 0.35 | 0.608 |
Postoperative 24 h | 0.0 ± 0.18 | 0.0 ± 0.00 | 0.0 ± 0.35 | 0.608 |
Table 3 Comparison of PAED scores of children at different time points among the three groups (points)
Time | D group (n = 125) | DS group (n = 126) | S group (n = 126) | P |
Postoperative 2 h | 8.1 ± 1.56 | 7.6 ± 1.64 | 8.3 ± 1.53b | 0.005 |
Postoperative 4 h | 2.1 ± 1.79 | 2.0 ± 1.76 | 4.4 ± 3.08a,b | < 0.001 |
Postoperative 6 h | 0.5 ± 1.16 | 1.3 ± 1.01a | 1.4 ± 1.07a | < 0.001 |
Postoperative 8 h | 0.0 ± 0.00 | 0.0 ± 0.00 | 0.0 ± 0.00 | > 0.999 |
Postoperative 12 h | 0.0 ± 0.00 | 0.0 ± 0.00 | 0.0 ± 0.00 | > 0.999 |
Postoperative 24 h | 0.0 ± 0.00 | 0.0 ± 0.00 | 0.0 ± 0.00 | > 0.999 |
Table 4 Comparison of satisfactory degree to Ramsay sedation score (sedation scores of 2 or 3 points) of children at different time points among the three groups, n (%)
Time | D group (n = 125) | DS group (n = 126) | S group (n = 126) | P |
Postoperative 2 h | 107 (85.6) | 105 (83.3) | 87 (69.0)a,b | 0.005 |
Postoperative 4 h | 127 (100.0) | 122 (96.8) | 106 (84.1)a,b | < 0.001 |
Postoperative 6 h | 127 (100.0) | 127 (100.0) | 120 (95.2)a,b | 0.001 |
Postoperative 8 h | 127 (100.0) | 127 (100.0) | 126 (100.0) | > 0.999 |
Postoperative 12 h | 127 (100.0) | 127 (100.0) | 126 (100.0) | > 0.999 |
Postoperative 24 h | 127 (100.0) | 127 (100.0) | 126 (100.0) | > 0.999 |
Table 5 Comparison of satisfactory degree to Cole 5-point scale score sedation score (Cole 5-point scale score > 2) of children at different time points among the three groups (points, mean ± SD), n (%)
Time | D group (n = 125) | DS group (n = 126) | S group (n = 126) | P |
Postoperative 2 h | 107 (85.6) | 109 (86.5) | 87 (69.0)a,b | 0.001 |
Postoperative 4 h | 65 (52.0) | 56 (44.4) | 68 (54.0) | 0.299 |
Postoperative 6 h | 106 (84.8) | 105 (83.3) | 95 (75.4) | 0.149 |
Postoperative 8 h | 127 (100.0) | 127 (100.0) | 126 (100.0) | > 0.999 |
Postoperative 12 h | 127 (100.0) | 127 (100.0) | 126 (100.0) | > 0.999 |
Postoperative 24 h | 127 (100.0) | 127 (100.0) | 126 (100.0) | > 0.999 |
Table 6 Comparison of postoperative incidence of nausea and vomiting of children in different groups, n (%)
D group (n = 125) | DS group (n = 126) | S group (n = 126) | |
Nausea | 4 (3.2) | 18 (14.3) | 10 (7.9) |
Vomit | 0 (0.0) | 8 (6.3) | 2 (1.6) |
- Citation: Liu G, Zhang L, Wang HS, Lin Y, Jin HQ, Wang XD, Qiao WN, Zhang YT, Sun JQ, Liu ZN. Dexmededomidine in pediatric unilateral internal inguinal ring ligation. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(21): 7376-7385
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i21/7376.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7376