Impact of failure mode and effects analysis-based emergency management on the effectiveness of craniocerebral injury treatment

Table 1 Comparison of emergency care between the two groups (mean ± SD, min)

Group	No. of cases	Pre-hospital emergency response time	Time spent on admission	Time spent on imaging report	Time spent on test report
Study Group	42	9.13 ± 2.37	2.39 ± 0.44	21.15 ± 4.44	32.19 ± 6.23
Control group	42	12.78 ± 4.06	3.58 ± 0.71	33.49 ± 5.51	50.41 ± 11.45
t value		5.032	9.233	11.301	9.059
P value		0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000

Table 2 Comparison of the levels of inflammatory stress indicators before and after the intervention in the two groups (mean ± SD)

Group	Number of cases	IL-6 (pg/mL)		CRP (mg/L)		PCT (ng/mL)
		Pre-intervention	Post-intervention	Pre-intervention	Post-intervention	Pre-intervention	Post-intervention
Study Group	42	78.71 ± 27.59	17.35 ± 5.33	19.80 ± 6.77	2.27 ± 0.56	3.66 ± 1.82	0.22 ± 0.07
Control group	42	81.31 ± 32.11	30.15 ± 12.38	21.29 ± 8.02	3.13 ± 0.77	3.95 ± 2.11	0.38 ± 0.12
t value		0.398	6.154	0.920	5.854	0.674	7.464
P value		0.692	0.000	0.360	0.000	0.502	0.000

IL-6: Interleukin-6; CRP: C-reactive protein; PCT: Procalcitonin.

Table 3 Comparison of complication rates between the two groups, n (%)

Group	Number of cases	Electrolyte disturbance	Central hyperthermia	Pulmonary infection	Brain hernia		Total incidence
Study Group	42	1 (2.38)	2 (4.76)	1 (2.38)	0 (0.00)	4 (9.52)
Control group	42	4 (9.52)	3 (7.14)	3 (7.14)	1 (2.38)	11 (26.19)
χ2 value						3.977
P value						0.046

Table 4 Comparison of the prognosis of the two groups, n (%)

Group	Number of cases	Good	Moderate disability	Severe disability	Vegetative state	Death from illness
Study Group	42	16 (38.10)	12 (28.57)	11 (26.19)	2 (4.76)	1 (2.38)
Control group	42	8 (19.05)	10 (23.81)	14 (33.33)	7 (16.67)	3 (7.14)
χ2 value		2.479
P value		0.013

Table 5 Comparison of nursing satisfaction between the two groups, n (%)

Group	Number of cases	Highly satisfied	Fairly satisfied	Unsatisfied	Satisfaction with the intervention
Study group	42	29 (69.05)	11 (26.19)	2 (4.76)	40 (95.24)
Control group	42	21 (50.00)	12 (28.57)	9 (21.43)	33 (78.57)
χ2 value					5.126
P value					0.024