Published online Jan 14, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i2.554
Peer-review started: September 2, 2021
First decision: September 29, 2021
Revised: October 14, 2021
Accepted: November 26, 2021
Article in press: November 26, 2021
Published online: January 14, 2022
Processing time: 131 Days and 19.1 Hours
Craniocerebral injuries encompass brain injuries, skull fractures, cranial soft tissue injuries, and similar injuries. Recently, the incidence of craniocerebral injuries has increased dramatically due to the increased numbers of traffic accidents and aerial work injuries, threatening the physical and mental health of patients.
To investigate the impact of failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA)-based emergency management on craniocerebral injury treatment effectiveness.
Eighty-four patients with craniocerebral injuries, treated at our hospital from November 2019 to March 2021, were selected and assigned, using the random number table method, to study (n = 42) and control (n = 42) groups. Patients in the control group received conventional management while those in the study group received FMEA theory-based emergency management, based on the control group. Pre- and post-interventions, details regarding the emergency situation; levels of inflammatory stress indicators [Interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT)]; incidence of complications; prognoses; and satisfaction regarding patient care were evaluated for both groups.
For the study group, the assessed parameters [pre-hospital emergency response time (9.13 ± 2.37 min), time to receive a consultation (2.39 ± 0.44 min), time needed to report imaging findings (1.15 ± 4.44 min), and test reporting time (32.19 ± 6.23 min)] were shorter than those for the control group (12.78 ± 4.06 min, 3.58 ± 0.71 min, 33.49 ± 5.51 min, 50.41 ± 11.45 min, respectively; P < 0.05). Pre-intervention serum levels of IL-6 (78.71 ± 27.59 pg/mL), CRP (19.80 ± 6.77 mg/L), and PCT (3.66 ± 1.82 ng/mL) in the study group patients were not significantly different from those in the control group patients (81.31 ± 32.11 pg/mL, 21.29 ± 8.02 mg/L, and 3.95 ± 2.11 ng/mL respectively; P > 0.05); post-intervention serum indicator levels were lower in both groups than pre-intervention levels. Further, serum levels of IL-6 (17.35 ± 5.33 pg/mL), CRP (2.27 ± 0.56 mg/L), and PCT (0.22 ± 0.07 ng/mL) were lower in the study group than in the control group (30.15 ± 12.38 pg/mL, 3.13 ± 0.77 mg/L, 0.38 ± 0.12 ng/mL, respectively; P < 0.05). The complication rate observed in the study group (9.52%) was lower than that in the control group (26.19%, P < 0.05). The prognoses for the study group patients were better than those for the control patients (P < 0.05). Patient care satisfaction was higher in the study group (95.24%) than in the control group (78.57%, P < 0.05).
FMEA-based craniocerebral injury management effectively shortens the time spent on emergency care, reduces inflammatory stress and complication risk levels, and helps improve patient prognoses, while achieving high patient care satisfaction levels.
Core Tip: This study investigated the impact of failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA)-based emergency management on craniocerebral injury treatment effectiveness, we conducted a retrospective analysis of the two groups of patients and finally concluded: FMEA-based craniocerebral injury management effectively shortens time spent on emergency care, reduces inflammatory stress and complication risk levels, and helps improve patient prognosis, while achieving high patient satisfaction levels.