Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. May 6, 2022; 10(13): 4042-4049
Published online May 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i13.4042
Published online May 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i13.4042
Table 1 Comparison of perioperative conditions between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Groups | Cases | Operating time (min) | Intraoperative blood loss (mL) | Recovery time of gastrointestinal function (h) | No. of lymph node dissections (bout) | Hospital stay (d) |
Study group | 48 | 186.18 ± 33.54 | 111.34 ± 21.45 | 25.35 ± 4.55 | 15.19 ± 3.04 | 10.09 ± 2.38 |
Control group | 48 | 129.38 ± 26.83 | 163.77 ± 32.41 | 36.06 ± 7.13 | 16.20 ± 298 | 13.51 ± 3.66 |
t | 9.162 | 9.346 | 8.773 | 1.643 | 5.427 | |
P | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.104 | 0.000 |
Table 2 Comparison of inflammatory response index levels before and after the operation between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Time | Groups | Cases | CRP (mg/L) | IL-6 (ng/mL) | IL-8 (ng/L) | IL-10 (ng/L) |
Before the operation | Study group | 48 | 7.98 ± 2.33 | 9.79 ± 4.11 | 3.79 ± 1.71 | 48.96 ± 12.51 |
Control group | 48 | 8.29 ± 2.60 | 10.56 ± 3.78 | 4.08 ± 1.45 | 50.13 ± 11.67 | |
t | 0.615 | 0.955 | 0.896 | 0.474 | ||
P | 0.540 | 0.342 | 0.373 | 0.637 | ||
After the operation | Study group | 48 | 14.91 ± 5.56 | 19.11 ± 6.68 | 12.61 ± 3.69 | 36.48 ± 9.39 |
Control group | 48 | 21.79 ± 7.33 | 34.03 ± 9.40 | 16.67 ± 4.54 | 28.39 ± 7.61 | |
t | 5.181 | 8.964 | 4.808 | 4.637 | ||
P | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Table 3 Comparison of pain stress response indexes before and after operation between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Time | Groups | Cases | NPY (g/L) | PGE2 (ng/L) | 5-HT (ng/L) |
Before the operation | Study group | 48 | 109.79 ± 13.46 | 269.54 ± 37.34 | 151.70 ± 18.86 |
Control group | 48 | 113.29 ± 15.01 | 273.91 ± 40.04 | 148.85 ± 20.45 | |
t | 1.203 | 0.553 | 0.710 | ||
P | 0.232 | 0.582 | 0.480 | ||
After the operation | Study group | 48 | 153.13 ± 16.91 | 313.76 ± 40.64 | 218.78 ± 22.65 |
Controlgroup | 48 | 178.68 ± 20.51 | 369.78 ± 44.37 | 267.64 ± 30.74 | |
t | 6.659 | 6.450 | 8.865 | ||
P | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Table 4 Comparison of the incidence of complications between the two groups, n (%)
Groups | Cases | Anastomotic leakage | Ileac passion | Infection of incisional wound | Deep vein thrombosis | Total incidence rate |
Study group | 48 | 1 (2.08) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (2.08) | 0 (0.00) | 2 (4.17) |
Control group | 48 | 3 (6.25) | 2 (4.17) | 3 (6.25) | 1 (2.08) | 9 (18.75) |
χ2 | 5.031 | |||||
P | 0.025 |
- Citation: He LH, Yang B, Su XQ, Zhou Y, Zhang Z. Comparison of clinical efficacy and postoperative inflammatory response between laparoscopic and open radical resection of colorectal cancer. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(13): 4042-4049
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i13/4042.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i13.4042