Case Report Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 16, 2021; 9(26): 7786-7797
Published online Sep 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i26.7786
Secondary injuries caused by ill-suited rehabilitation treatments: Five case reports
Ling Zhou, Ya-Qin Zhou, Lei Yang, Si-Yuan Ma, Institute of Burn Research, Southwest Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, The Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
ORCID number: Ling Zhou (0000-0002-2574-8483); Ya-Qin Zhou (0000-0002-0514-8587); Lei Yang (0000-0001-8630-2074); Si-Yuan Ma (0000-0002-3542-4490).
Author contributions: Ma SY contributed to the conception of the study; Zhou L performed the data analyses and wrote the manuscript; Zhou YQ helped perform the analysis with constructive discussions; Yang L made tables and figures.
Supported by State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, No. SKLJYJF18; and First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, No. SWH2019QNLC-04.
Informed consent statement: All study participants, or their legal guardian, provided informed written consent prior to study enrollment.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare no conflict of interests.
CARE Checklist (2016) statement: The authors have read the CARE Checklist (2016), and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the CARE Checklist (2016).
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Si-Yuan Ma, MD, PhD, Attending Doctor, Institute of Burn Research, Southwest Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, The Army Medical University, No. 30 Gaotanyan Street, Chongqing 400038, China. tmmu_msy@126.com
Received: December 16, 2020
Peer-review started: December 16, 2020
First decision: May 5, 2021
Revised: May 31, 2021
Accepted: August 3, 2021
Article in press: August 3, 2021
Published online: September 16, 2021

Abstract
BACKGROUND

Increasing attention is being given to burn rehabilitation, and an increasing number of burn patients are undergoing rehabilitation. However, little attention has been given to secondary injuries caused by ill-suited rehabilitation practices. Patients, especially those in undeveloped countries, sustain injuries due to inadequate burn rehabilitation practices and the nonstandard implementation of rehabilitation treatments.

CASE SUMMARY

This study reports 5 cases of secondary injuries caused by ill-suited burn rehabilitation practices in our institute, including first web space contracture caused by a single orthosis treatment, finger deformity caused by improper compression therapy with a self-adhering bandage, developmental impairment of the affected limb caused by continuous improper compression therapy, and fracture caused by overly intensive rehabilitation exercise.

CONCLUSION

More attention should be given to burn rehabilitation to reduce the incidence of secondary injuries caused by ill-suited rehabilitation practices. Burn rehabilitation system should include specialized hospitals (burn rehabilitation centers), community hospitals, and family rehabilitation clinics. Precise instruments and equipment, accurate measurement methods, objective monitoring indicators and standardized guidelines and recommendations will help improve the quality of burn rehabilitation. Additionally, more attention should be given to burn rehabilitation in children.

Key Words: Ill-suited rehabilitation treatments, Injury, Burn rehabilitation system, Burn, Case report

Core Tip: Functional reconstruction and rehabilitation are dynamically developing processes. Burn rehabilitation treatment should encompass the whole process from the time of the injury to when the patient returns to society, and appropriate rehabilitation measures should be taken at different stages of burn treatment. Rehabilitation therapists should systematically study clinical knowledge related to burns and explore the timing and use of various rehabilitation treatment techniques with clinical treatment to improve their professional level of rehabilitation. Moreover, the establishment of a national burn rehabilitation society and other academic organizations to further promote the popularization, development, standardization and improvement of burn rehabilitation treatment is warranted.



INTRODUCTION

With improvements in healthcare, the chances of survival and rehabilitation after burn injury have increased substantially. In the comprehensive treatment of patients, burn rehabilitation, which is gradually being offered to an increasing number of patients, with almost all patients now receiving rehabilitation, is initiated after the completion of burn treatment as well as during the late, middle, and even early stages of burn treatment[1-3]. The current global consensus is that functional exercise and rehabilitation should start early in the burn treatment course, especially in patients with severe burns[4-7]. Preventing postburn deformities is more beneficial than correcting deformities after they occur[8]. Burn rehabilitation is an emerging discipline that has gradually developed in recent years, especially in China, which has the largest population of burn patients, but treatment concepts and operational specifications for burn rehabilitation are not aligned with actual clinical processes, resulting in secondary injuries, increased pain, additional medical visits, increased costs, and even severe irreversible consequences[9-11]. This study reports 5 typical clinical cases treated in our center in recent years to provide a reference for burn rehabilitation personnel regarding possible injuries that may occur in the process of burn rehabilitation.

CASE PRESENTATION
Chief complaints

All 5 patients were male, with ages ranging from 2 years to 31 years; all of the patients were burned by flame. The patients had hypertrophic burn scars and functional impairments.

History of present illness

They underwent different burn rehabilitation techniques and sustained secondary injuries due to these techniques (Tables 1 and 2).

Table 1 General characteristics of the 5 cases.

Sex
Age (yr)
Cause of injury
Total body surface area (%)
Main body parts
Skin grafting
Rehabilitation issues
Case 1Male31Flame72HandsSplit-thickness skin graftingHypertrophic burn scar, flexion deformity, narrowing of the first web space
Case 2Male2Flame2Left handSplit-thickness skin graftingHypertrophic burn scar, left syndactyly
Case 3Male6FlameUnknownFaceNo skin graftingHypertrophic burn scar of the jaw
Case 4Male3FlameUnknownRight lower limbMesh graftingHypertrophic burn scar
Case 5Male11Flame71Lower limbsSkin graftingFlexion contracture of bilateral popliteal fossa caused by scar contracture
Table 2 Main rehabilitation measures and the injuries of the patients.

Main rehabilitation measures
Main problems
New injuries
Remedies
Outcomes
Case 1 (Figure 1)Compression therapy; Functional orthosisOrthotic device was not adjusted properlySignificantly reduced first web space angle, thumb abduction and flexion contracture of metacarpophalangeal jointAdded an extension position orthosis that was alternated with a functional orthosisAppearance and function of the hands were improved significantly
Case 2 (Figure 2)Compression therapy, home rehabilitation, regular follow-upWrong wrapping method, excessive compression, not followed regularlySyndactyly, hyperplasia, and hypertrophy of the distal soft tissue of the fingers on the left handEducated the parents about rehabilitation training, demonstrated correct wrapping methods, surgically corrected syndactyly, followed up regularlyThe finger webs were evenly spaced, and the soft tissue hypertrophy of the little finger was alleviated
Case 3 (Figure 3)Compression therapy with elastic headgearElastic headgear was worn too long, size was not adjusted in time; not followed regularlyRestricted development of alveolar bone; restricted mouth opening and occlusal dysfunctionProvided modified elastic headgear in time and optimized the wearing scheme; followed up every monthRestricted mouth opening was relieved; occlusal function returned to normal, and the facial appearance was significantly improved
Case 4 (Figure 4)Compression therapyElastic bandage was applied with too much pressure for a long timeLimb muscle atrophyAdjusted the compression intensity of the elastic bandage, strengthened functional exercise of the affected limb, performed massage and kerotherapy to promote blood circulationDeformity of the lower leg was improved slightly
Case 5 (Figure 5)Functional exercise, antiscar treatmentViolent correction of lower limb flexion deformityFemoral fractureImmobilized the affected limb with a plaster castThe fracture gradually healed
History of past illness

No special circumstances.

Personal and family history

All 5 patients have no special personal and family history.

Physical examination

Hypertrophic burn scars and functional impairments.

FINAL DIAGNOSIS
Case 1

Seventy-two percent total body surface area burned (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Figure 1 Treatment with an improper brace led to secondary deformity and malfunction of both hands. A: Simple fixation in a functional position in the early stage; B: Reduced thumb abduction and flexion; contracture of the metacarpophalangeal joint; C: Alternating use of 2 orthotic devices in functional and straight positions; D: At 4 mo after treatment, flexion of the metacarpophalangeal joint, first web space contracture, and thumb abduction all improved significantly.
Case 2

Hypertrophic burn scar and syndactyly on the left hand (Figure 2A).

Figure 2
Figure 2 Improper rehabilitation at home led to distal deformities of the fingers. A: Four days after the burn; B: At 7 mo after the burn, syndactyly of the third and fourth fingers and abnormal growth of the distal soft tissue of multiple fingers were observed; C: At 8 mo after the burn (1 mo after syndactyly repair), syndactyly was corrected, and distal soft tissue deformity of multiple fingers was alleviated; D: At eleven months after the burn (3 mo after syndactyly repair) (left) and at 14 mo after the burn (6 mo after syndactyly repair) (right), the above deformities had obviously improved.
Case 3

Hypertrophic scars of the jaw after a burn (Figure 3A).

Figure 3
Figure 3 Abnormal mandibular development due to improper compression therapy occurred because regular follow-up was not adhered to as suggested. A: Three years after the burn injury; B: After 2 year of compression therapy using elastic headgear and before scalp tissue expansion (5 year after the burn); C: Scalp tissue expansion following 2 year of compression therapy using elastic headgear (5 year after the burn); D: Two years after regular follow-up and regular adjustment of the headgear for compression therapy (7 year after the burn).
Case 4

Hypertrophic scar on the right lower limb (Figure 4).

Figure 4
Figure 4 Improper home rehabilitation treatment led to severe dystrophy of the affected limb. A: During the burn wound repair period; B: Seven months after the burn; C: Nine months (left) and 18 mo (right) after the burn; D: Five years after the burn.
Case 5

Large-area burn and flexion contracture of the bilateral popliteal fossa caused by scar contracture (Figure 5A).

Figure 5
Figure 5 Fracture by ill-suited burn rehabilitation. A: Large-area burns on the body of the child on admission on January 12, 2016; B: Right femoral fracture on August 1, 2016 (B1); 10 d after plaster immobilization (B2); the fracture was almost healed 1 mo after immobilization (B3); C: Scars on September 7, 2016.
TREATMENT
Case 1

Split-thickness skin grafting.

Case 2

Compression therapy with a self-adhering bandage, range-of-motion exercises for the hand joints, home rehabilitation, and regular follow-up (which was not adhered to by the patient’s parents) comprised the rehabilitation regimen.

Case 3

Compression therapy with elastic headgear performed at home.

Case 4

An elastic bandage applied with pressure.

Case 5

Skin grafting, functional exercise, occupational therapy, physical therapy, and antiscar treatment.

OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP
Case 1

Outcome: Although the wound healed, hypertrophic burn scars, flexion deformities, and narrowing of the first web space developed. He received the following rehabilitation regimen: Compression therapy with a self-adhering bandage and bedside range-of-motion exercises and a functional orthosis at night and while at rest (the wrist was placed in the palmar flexion position, the finger webs were spaced with sterile gauze, the metacarpophalangeal joint was maintained in a natural position of 40°-50° of flexion, the interphalangeal joints were fully extended, and the thumb was fixed in opposition to the fingers with abduction (Figure 1A).

Follow-up: Several weeks later, flexion-adduction deformity of both thumbs and flexion contracture of the metacarpophalangeal joint gradually appeared, and the first web space angle and thumb abduction were significantly reduced (Figure 1B). The orthosis was immediately adjusted. An additional orthosis was used to fix the fingers in the extension position, and the thumb was abducted (Figure 1C). The functional orthosis and the extension position orthosis were worn alternately on the subsequent days. Approximately four months later, the appearance and function of the hands improved significantly (Figure 1D).

Case 2

Outcome: Because of ischemia and hypoxia caused by improper wrapping (using a self-adhering bandage starting from the middle of the fingertip) and too much pressure, excessive cell proliferation, hypertrophy and syndactyly occurred in the distal soft tissue of the fingers of the left hand. Abnormal tissue exceeded the boundary of the nail bed, especially in the little finger. The patient did not regularly attend follow-ups. X-ray examination showed significant hyperplasia of the soft tissue beyond the distal phalanx of the left little and ring fingers, with these fingers being significantly longer than the corresponding fingers of the right hand (Figure 2B).

Follow-up: Syndactyly was surgically corrected, and pads were placed between the fingers to provide compression. The parents received training on the appropriate wrapping method (i.e., wrapping the self-adhering bandage starting from the distal end of the fingernail with proper compression to ensure that the skin of the fingertip was pink after bandaging) and were advised to attend the follow-ups regularly. Several months later, the finger webs were evenly spaced, and soft tissue hypertrophy of the little finger was alleviated (Figure 2C and D).

Case 3

Outcome: Due to the lack of regular follow-up, the elastic headgear was worn for too long, and the size was not adjusted in a timely manner. The development of alveolar bone was restricted and led to mandibular adduction deformity and occlusal dysfunction. Mouth opening was also restricted; the distance between the upper and lower lips was 2 cm, and the distance between the corners of the mouth was 4 cm (Figure 3B).

Follow-up: To address these issues, elastic headgear of an appropriate size was immediately provided to increase local compression of the lower jaw and provide circumferential compression of the head. An optimized wearing scheme was provided and relevant precautions were taken to balance pressure treatment and occlusal function training. Regular follow-up every month was planned. Seven years later, the restricted mouth opening was relieved. Moreover, the occlusion was alleviated, and the facial appearance had significantly improved (Figure 3C and D). During rehabilitation, the child underwent a tissue expander flap repair operation because of scalp scar hyperplasia and hair loss.

Case 4

Outcome: The limb muscle was atrophied because the elastic bandage was applied too tightly for prolonged period of time (Figure 4A and B).

Follow-up: After adjusting the compression intensity of the elastic bandage and strengthening functional exercise of the affected limb, as well as providing massage and kerotherapy to promote blood circulation for 5 years, the deformity of the lower leg was slightly improved (Table 3, Figure 4C and D).

Table 3 The status of the patient at the follow-up visit at 5 year after the burn.
Body part
Left circumference (the injured side, cm)
Right circumference (cm)
Ankle joint2019
Thickest part of the calf2025
10 cm below the knee21.221
Thickest part of the thigh3033
Leg length65.567
Case 5

Outcome: During rehabilitation provided by his parents, violent correction of the lower limb flexion deformity led to femoral fracture (Figure 5B1 and B2).

Follow-up: The fracture gradually healed after immobilization in a plaster cast for one month (Figure 5B3), and the scar was reduced (Figure 5C).

DISCUSSION

In the 5 cases reported herein, ill-suited rehabilitation treatment led to secondary injuries, including serious deformities and irreversible developmental disorders. In patient 1, the therapists focused on fixation in the functional position and neglected to apply an orthosis in the extension position; this was due to a lack of therapist experience or a lack of communication between the therapist and surgeon. In patients 2 and 5, lack of family rehabilitation knowledge and rehabilitation skills were the primary causes of the secondary injuries. In patients 3 and 4, the balance between physiological development and compression therapy was not well managed. All the patients except for patient 5 did not regularly attend follow-ups according to the guidance provided by their physicians. Burn rehabilitation in China is suboptimal due to serious challenges, such as a lack of full-time personnel, a lack of public acceptance of burn rehabilitation regimens, inadequate burn rehabilitation systems, the concept of “self-sufficiency, decentralized development”, insufficient social support, limited input from governmental and nongovernmental institutions, low social awareness, and a lack of volunteers and social workers. There are also other serious deficiencies in innovative and effective treatment proposals and means, multidisciplinary cooperation, and systematic scientific and objective evaluation systems[12,13].

It should be emphasized that the burn treatment process is extremely complicated and long. Burn rehabilitation should encompass the whole process from the time of the injury to return to society, and appropriate rehabilitation measures should be implemented at different stages during burn treatment. Rehabilitation therapists should systematically study clinical information related to burns and explore the timing and use of various rehabilitation techniques together with clinical treatments to improve rehabilitation outcomes. Precise instruments and equipment, accurate measurement methods, and objective monitoring indicators are effective in improving the quality of burn rehabilitation. For example, accurate pressure measurement can reduce complications associated with pressure treatments, objective angle measurement can accurately indicate the effect of joint rehabilitation, and intelligent rehabilitation instruments can reduce damage in the process of joint training. In addition, standardized guidelines and recommendations for burn rehabilitation will help reduce the risk of secondary damage in the process of burn rehabilitation.

Burn rehabilitation involves teamwork. The multidisciplinary team should comprise burn surgeons, rehabilitation physicians, rehabilitation therapists, nurses, family members of the patient and the patient[14]. Personnel specializing in burn rehabilitation, orthopedics, psychology, sports medicine and other relevant disciplines should be recruited through interdisciplinary consultations and multi disciplinary team. The burn department should initiate the establishment of a flexible and interdisciplinary burn rehabilitation team to establish rehabilitation approaches for burn patients and a relatively stable multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment guidelines. Moreover, the establishment of a national burn rehabilitation society and other academic organizations to further promote the popularization, development, standardization and improvement of burn rehabilitation is warranted.

A three-level burn rehabilitation system comprising a specialized hospital (burn rehabilitation center), community hospital, and family rehabilitation clinic will help alleviate and improve the current challenges of burn rehabilitation in China (Figure 6). In this system, well-equipped professional burn rehabilitation centers, as the first and highest level of the system, can also be established as regional burn rehabilitation training bases with the support of the state or social institutions. Their main tasks are the early rehabilitation of burn patients and the administration of important key treatments, excluding surgical treatment. In addition, the development of novel innovations, the formulation and promotion of standards, and training on and the popularization of burn rehabilitation knowledge and skills should be implemented to provide rehabilitation guidance for community health care institutions and families. Community health centers mainly treat patients requiring burn rehabilitation who are transferred from professional burn rehabilitation centers. They provide general or burn-related rehabilitation, including functional exercise, and technical guidance for family members, but they do not perform surgery. As the terminal treatment unit, family rehabilitation clinics are mainly responsible for regular and ongoing general rehabilitation, including functional exercise, which is needed by all burn rehabilitation patients. Studies have shown that family involvement in burn rehabilitation has positive impacts on a patient’s return to society and physical, social, and psychological wellbeing[15]. However, family involvement in rehabilitation requires the participation and assistance of professional rehabilitation institutions, governments, and social agencies; publicization of the concept of family involvement in burn rehabilitation, popularization of relevant knowledge and skills, and the formation of feedback and guidance mechanisms to promote family involvement in burn rehabilitation. For both outpatients and inpatients in our unit, many brochures on burns, scars and rehabilitation were provided to improve knowledge and provide guidance to benefit the patients and their families. Of course, it is important to encourage and prompt additional medical personnel to engage in burn rehabilitation work, increase the number of employees, and alleviate the current shortage of human resources.

Figure 6
Figure 6 Three-level burn rehabilitation treatment system. Consolidation rehabilitation: Repetitive rehabilitation therapy without a new treatment program; Intensive rehabilitation: The addition of new treatment approaches or the modification and adjustment of treatment approaches for some conditions; Comprehensive rehabilitation: Professional burn rehabilitation and general rehabilitation treatment. Surgical treatment includes surgical correction or functional reconstruction.

Improper burn rehabilitation leads to more serious or even irreversible secondary damage in children with burns than in adults. For example, patient 4 experienced limb dystrophy, and patients 2 and 3 exhibited skeletal and soft tissue developmental malformations. We should pay more attention to burn rehabilitation in children. Under the premise of early rehabilitation, combined with the characteristics of children’s growth and development and specific rehabilitation needs, we should establish meticulous individualized treatment courses, increase the frequency and duration of follow-up, and adjust treatment plans and approaches, such as changing the pressure of clothing or adjusting the parameters of braces, in a timely manner.

CONCLUSION

In summary, more attention should be given to secondary injuries caused by ill-suited rehabilitation. The three-level burn rehabilitation system, standardized treatment guidelines and recommendation, precision instruments and equipment, accurate measurement methods, objective monitoring indices, good multidisciplinary cooperation and the academic study of burn rehabilitation will benefit burn rehabilitation patients. Burn rehabilitation training may be a good starting point for the establishment of the three-level system. Additional attention should be given to burn rehabilitation in children.

Footnotes

Manuscript source: Unsolicited manuscript

Specialty type: Medicine, research and experimental

Country/Territory of origin: China

Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification

Grade A (Excellent): 0

Grade B (Very good): 0

Grade C (Good): C, C

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): E

P-Reviewer: Karim HMR, Mance M, Sahu SA S-Editor: Gao CC L-Editor: A P-Editor: Yuan YY

References
1.  Jacobson K, Fletchall S, Dodd H, Starnes C. Current Concepts Burn Rehabilitation, Part I: Care During Hospitalization. Clin Plast Surg. 2017;44:703-712.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Guo ZR. Current situation and perspective of burn rehabilitation in China. Zhonghua Sunshang Yu Xiufu Zazhi (Dianzi Ban). 2018;13:161-164.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Kornhaber R, Rickard G, McLean L, Wiechula R, Lopez V, Cleary M. Burn care and rehabilitation in Australia: health professionals' perspectives. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41:714-719.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Gomez M, Tushinski M, Jeschke MG. Impact of Early Inpatient Rehabilitation on Adult Burn Survivors' Functional Outcomes and Resource Utilization. J Burn Care Res. 2017;38:e311-e317.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Dodd H, Fletchall S, Starnes C, Jacobson K. Current Concepts Burn Rehabilitation, Part II: Long-Term Recovery. Clin Plast Surg. 2017;44:713-728.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Jagnoor J, Lukaszyk C, Christou A, Potokar T, Chamania S, Ivers R. Where to from here? BMC Res Notes. 2018;11:224.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Chinese Burn Association; Chinese Association of Burn Surgeons, Cen Y, Chai J, Chen H, Chen J, Guo G, Han C, Hu D, Huan J, Huang X, Jia C, Li-Tsang CW, Li J, Li Z, Liu Q, Liu Y, Luo G, Lv G, Niu X, Peng D, Peng Y, Qi H, Qi S, Sheng Z, Tang D, Wang Y, Wu J, Xia Z, Xie W, Yang H, Yi X, Yu L, Zhang G;  Chinese Burn Care and Rehabilitation Association. Guidelines for burn rehabilitation in China. Burns Trauma. 2015;3:20.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Young AW, Dewey WS, King BT. Rehabilitation of Burn Injuries: An Update. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2019;30:111-132.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Wu J, Wang YZ. [A brief history of burn rehabilitation medicine in China]. Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2019;35:81-85.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Ao M, Wu J, Chen J. [Investigation of burn rehabilitation development of China in 2014]. Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2017;33:260-266.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Guo ZR, Li F, Tu HX, Gao GZ, Cui XL, Zhang B, Lu CH, Zhang P. [Initiation, development, and achievements of burn rehabilitation therapy in China]. Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2018;34:835-839.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Chen J, Li-Tsang CW, Yan H, Liang G, Tan J, Yang S, Wu J. A survey on the current status of burn rehabilitation services in China. Burns. 2013;39:269-278.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Wu J, Chen J. [Current situation and reflection on rehabilitation after burn injury in China]. Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2013;29:505-508.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Goverman J, Mathews K, Holavanahalli RK, Vardanian A, Herndon DN, Meyer WJ, Kowalske K, Fauerbach J, Gibran NS, Carrougher GJ, Amtmann D, Schneider JC, Ryan CM. The National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research Burn Model System: Twenty Years of Contributions to Clinical Service and Research. J Burn Care Res. 2017;38:e240-e253.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 45]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 46]  [Article Influence: 7.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Yurdalan SU, Ünlü B, Seyyah M, Şenyıldız B, Çetin YK, Çimen M. Effects of structured home-based exercise program on depression status and quality of life in burn patients. Burns. 2018;44:1287-1293.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]