Case Report Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Apr 26, 2020; 8(8): 1495-1501
Published online Apr 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i8.1495
Rare anaplastic sarcoma of the kidney: A case report
Jsun-Liang Kao, Chih-Chung Shiao, Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Camillian Saint Mary’s Hospital Luodong, Yilan 26546, Taiwan
Swei-Hsiung Tsung, Department of Pathology, Camillian Saint Mary’s Hospital Luodong, Yilan 26546, Taiwan
Chih-Chung Shiao, Saint Mary’s Junior College of Medicine, Nursing and Management, Yilan 26546, Taiwan
ORCID number: Jsun-Liang Kao (0000-0002-7060-4788); Swei-Hsiung Tsung (0000-0002-8115-2844); Chih-Chung Shiao (0000-0003-2220-7574).
Author contributions: Kao JL and Shiao CC gathered the information of the patients, wrote the manuscript and approved the manuscript; Tsung SH performed the pathological interpretation, wrote the manuscript, revised the manuscript and approved the manuscript.
Informed consent statement: Informed written consent was obtained from the patient’s family member for publication of this report and any accompanying images.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
CARE Checklist (2016) statement: The authors have read the CARE Checklist (2016), and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the CARE Checklist (2016).
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Chih-Chung Shiao, MD, Associate Professor, Deputy superintendent, Camillian Saint Mary’s Hospital Luodong, No. 160 Chong-Cheng South Road, Loudong, Yilan 26546, Taiwan. chungyy2001@smc.edu.tw
Received: January 23, 2020
Peer-review started: January 23, 2020
First decision: February 26, 2020
Revised: March 29, 2020
Accepted: April 17, 2020
Article in press: April 17, 2020
Published online: April 26, 2020
Processing time: 78 Days and 20.8 Hours

Abstract
BACKGROUND

Anaplastic sarcoma of the kidney (ASK) is a rare and newly recognized renal neoplasm. The tumor usually is extensive and cystic, characterized by pleomorphic spindle cells with marked atypia and associated with multinucleated cells. To date, only 27 cases have been reported in the literature. The authors present an additional case and summarize the relevant knowledge in the literature.

CASE SUMMARY

A 27-year-old previously healthy woman presented with a palpable mass over the abdomen and right flank soreness for one year. After the computed tomography study, the patient underwent right radical nephrectomy obtaining a 1680-g tumor with a size of 18.4 cm × 14.5 cm × 11 cm. The tumor is chiefly composed of anaplastic spindle cells with marked nuclear atypia admixed with multinucleated cells. Immunohistochemical evaluation of tumor cells exhibited diffuse positivity for CD56, p53, and vimentin, and focally positive for desmin. The diagnosis of ASK was established. Unfortunately, a local tumor recurrence followed by a distant metastasis developed within months. The patient died 26 months after the initial surgery. Comparing to the previously 27 cases of ASK, the current case had a relatively worse prognosis, which might be potentially associated with older patient age, larger tumor size, and the lack of en-bloc resection of adjacent organs during the initial radical nephrectomy.

CONCLUSION

This case points out the featured pathological findings for diagnosing ASK and suggests more aggressive management for patients with ASK.

Key Words: Anaplastic sarcoma of the kidney; En bloc resection; Local recurrence; Metastasis; Mortality; Radical nephrectomy; Case report

Core tip: The current case report points out the crucial features to differentiate the rare tumor, anaplastic sarcoma of the kidney (ASK), from other renal malignancies. Besides, the authors summarized the demographic, clinical, and prognostic information of the 28 ASK cases reported in the literature. Based on the lethal outcome in a 5-year old patient and two patients with stage 1 of the disease at presentation, we suggest that all patients with ASK should receive radical nephrectomy, en bloc resection of adjacent organs, chemotherapy, and long-term close follow-up. Further experience is essential to modify this approach in the future.



INTRODUCTION

Anaplastic sarcoma of the kidney (ASK) is a rare and newly recognized renal neoplasm, first described by Vujanić et al[1] in 2007. The tumor usually is extensive and cystic, characterized by pleomorphic spindle cells with marked atypia and associated with multinucleated cells. To the best of our knowledge, only 27 cases have been reported in the literature[1-8]. Herein, we present an additional case and summarize the relevant knowledge in the literature.

CASE PRESENTATION
Chief complaints

A 27-year-old woman had experienced right flank soreness for around one year.

History of present illness

She did not seek medical help until two months before the admission when she felt increasing painful swelling over the right flank and the right abdomen. There were no gastrointestinal or genitourinary complaints and body weight loss throughout the previous year.

History of past illness

The patient had a free previous medical history.

Physical examination

At presentation, the physical examination disclosed a huge palpable bulging mass over the right abdomen with slight tenderness.

Laboratory examinations

The laboratory tests revealed hemoglobin of 11.4 g/dL, white blood cell count of 7.4 × 109/L, serum creatinine of 1.5 mg/dL, estimated glomerular filtration rate of 44 mL/min/1.73 m², and urine red blood cell count of 30-50/high power field. Other laboratory biochemistries were unremarkable.

Imaging examinations

The abdominal sonography revealed a huge well-defined mass measuring about 15 cm in diameter over the right kidney. The tumor was multicystic with the solid component. The subsequent computed tomography (CT) demonstrated a huge, mainly hypodense, multi-loculated cystic tumor measuring about 18 cm × 14 cm × 11 cm (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Figure 1 Image of sonography and computed tomography. A: Sonography; B: Computed tomography. Discordant features of the renal anaplastic sarcoma in the image studies of sonography and computed tomography.
Further diagnostic work-up

Concerning the probability of malignancy, she underwent a right radical nephrectomy. No lymph node was dissected at the time of surgery. The resected kidney measured 18.4 cm × 14.5 cm × 11.0 cm and weighed 1680 g. The cut surface revealed a variable-size of multi-loculated cystic spaces filled with clear serous fluid. Protruding from the cystic wall was yellowish-gray solid nodules with focal areas of hemorrhage and necrosis. A narrow rim of residual kidney tissue was noted at the edge of the specimen (Figure 2A). Microscopically, the tumor was confined to the kidney and consisted of cystic and solid components. The cystic component was lined by a single layer of benign cuboidal cells (Figure 2B). The solid areas were composed of spindle cells with marked nuclear atypia admixed with multinucleated cells. Mitosis was frequent (Figure 2C and D). Myxoid changes were found (Figure 2E). Neither chondroid differentiation nor blastema-like cells were found in the sections studied. Immunohistochemical evaluation of tumor cells exhibited diffuse positivity for CD56, p53, and vimentin, and focally positive for desmin (Figure 2F-I). The remaining markers, including GFAP, CD34, S-100 protein, and WT-1, were negative. The positivity for P53 could be a reflection of anaplasia. Focal positive staining represented focal muscle differentiation.

Figure 2
Figure 2 Gross and microscopic findings of the anaplastic sarcoma of the kidney. A: The cut surface of the kidney showing multiloculated cysts with the solid component; B: The cystic spaces lined by low cuboidal epithelium (arrow) (H&E stain 200 ×); C: The solid areas displaying spindle cells admixed with large multinucleated cells (arrow) (H&E stain 200 ×); D: Cellular areas showing spindle cells with frequent mitosis (H&E stain 400 ×); E: The tumor displaying myxoid changes in focal areas (H&E stain 200 ×); F: CD56 Immunohistochemical stain showing diffuse positive membrane stain (200 ×); G: Tumor cells showing a positive nuclear pattern with anti-P53 (400 ×); H: Tumor cells showing focal positivity for desmin. Immunohistochemical stain (200 ×); I: Tumor cells showing focal positivity for WT-1, nuclear pattern. Immunohistochemical stain (400 ×).
FINAL DIAGNOSIS

Based on the histopathology and immunohistochemical profile, the final diagnosis of ASK was established.

TREATMENT

The patient received a right radical nephrectomy without chemotherapy before and after the surgery.

OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

Unfortunately, the patient experienced a local tumor recurrence over retroperitoneum about one year after the initial surgery. Despite the immediate resection of the recurrent tumor, distant metastasis to the liver with massive ascites developed within months. Finally, she expired 26 months after the initial radical nephrectomy.

DISCUSSION

Renal sarcomas are malignant tumors deriving from mesenchymal cells of the kidney, which accounts for 1% of all malignant renal tumors. The renal sarcoma family contains many tumors such as leiomyosarcoma, liposarcoma, fibrosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, osteosarcoma, and angiosarcoma, etc. ASK is an extraordinarily rare renal neoplasm characterized by a proliferation of anaplastic spindle cells with bizarre pleomorphic nuclei and atypical mitotic figures.

The cardinal signs at an advanced stage of ASK include flank pain, abdominal mass, and hematuria. The working diagnosis of ASK is processed by history taking, physical examination, and image studies. However, the definitive diagnosis is difficult to make without a pathological examination. In the imaging study, the ASK was highly suggested by the discordant image findings on sonography or CT scan, and the presence of predominant hyperechoic solid components on sonography but a mainly low-density cystic appearance on CT scan. It is postulated that cystic appearance on CT is related to the high-water content in the cyst and the abundant myxoid stroma.

In differential diagnosis, anaplastic Wilms tumor certainly is the most important and challenging one. Certain features help favor ASK when compared with anaplastic Wilms tumor; these features include age, the presence of markedly atypical and numerous anaplastic cells with increased mitotic activity, and the absence of blastema-like cells. Immunohistochemical stains for WT1 was negative. Positivity for CD56 was nonspecific for Wilms tumor. Other tumors to be considered in the differential diagnosis are renal synovial sarcomas[9], malignant mesenchymal[10], and malignant ectomesenchymomas[11].

The optimal treatment is radical nephrectomy with en-bloc resection of adjacent organs such as the spleen, pancreatic tail, or colon. Distant metastasis to lung, bone, and liver is common. Therefore, some patients had been prescribed chemotherapy with the Wilms tumor or Ewing sarcoma protocol[6]. Adjuvant chemotherapy regimen includes a varied combination of vincristine, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, doxorubicin, and carboplatin depending on different risk stratification and protocol[12-14]. However, the patients’ outcomes seem to correlate with tumor staging.

To date, a total of 28 patients, including the current case, have been reported in the literature[1-8]. In these 28 patients, the mean age at tumor diagnosis was 12.6 ± 11.4 [median (minimal, maximal) = 9.4 (0.6, 41.0)] years. Female sex (67.9% of the 28 patients) and the right kidney involvement (68.0% of the 25 patients with a known site) were more frequent in these patients. Female patients were significantly older than male patients at diagnosis (15.6 ± 12.5 years vs 6.3 ± 4.6 years, P = 0.008). At diagnosis, the mean size of the tumor was 13.9 ± 4.5 [15 (4.0, 22.0)] centimeters among the 24 patients with known tumor size, whereas 43.5%, 21.7%, 26.1%, and 8.7% patients were in stage I, II, III and IV, respectively, among the 23 patients with known staging. During the mean follow-up period of 5.5 ± 2.9 [2.9 (0.25, 15)] years, 68.2% patients had no recurrence, 4.5% had local recurrence, and 27.3% had distant metastases among the 22 patients with known results.

During the follow-up periods, five patients expired, 15 survived, and eight had unknown results. The period from diagnosis to the end of follow-up was 5.9 ± 4.2 [6.0 (0.25, 14)] years for the 15 survivors and 4.4 ± 6.0 [2.0 (1.2, 15)] years for the five patients who expired. The 5-year survival rate was 69.2% among the 13 patients who died or who had follow-up periods of more than five years (Table 1). Comparing to other reported cases of ASK, the current case was relatively older and had relatively larger tumor size at diagnosis. The female gender and the right kidney involvement were the same as the majority of the reported cases. Although the tumor stage was very early (stage I), the patient experienced local and distant metastasis, along with subsequent mortality within a relatively shorter period than previously reported cases. The potential reasons for the rapid tumor progression and worse prognoses included older patient age, larger tumor size, and the lack of en-bloc resection of adjacent organs during the initial radical nephrectomy.

Table 1 Summary and comparison of patients with anaplastic sarcoma of the kidney.
CaseAgeGenderSideSize of tumor (diameter/ weight)StageTherapyRelapseOutcomes
1[2]7 moFL18 cm/1620 gINNo recurrenceNED 2 yr
2[1]10 moFR15 cm/--C + NUnknownUnknown
3[1]11 moMR7.5 cm/250 g-N + CUnknownUnknown
4[1]1.5 yrMR10 cm/670 gIN + CNo recurrenceNED 13 yr
5[1]3 yrFL15 cm/-IN + CNo recurrenceNED 14 yr
6[3]3 yrFR19 cm/1420 gIIINUnknownUnknown
7[1]3.3 yrFR16 cm/1400 gIIC + N + CNo recurrenceNED 9 yr
8[1]4 yrML-/-IIC + N + CNo recurrenceNED 6 yr
9[1]4 yrFL-/-IN + CNo recurrenceNED 9 yr
10[1]4.3 yrM-21 cm/1820 gIIIN + CAbd recurrence, liver metastasesUnknown
11[1]4.8 yrMR11 cm/664 gIIC + N + CNo recurrenceNED 7 yr
12[1]5 yrMR13 cm/-IIIRT + N + C + RTLung and bone metastasesDOD 1.5 yr
13[1]8 yrFR4 cm/115 gIC + N + CNo recurrenceNED 8 yr
14[5]8.8 yrFL12.9 cm/-IIIN + R + CNo recurrenceNED 2.8 yr
15[1]10 yrML17 cm/1210 gIN + CNo recurrenceNED 8 yr
16[4]12 yrFR15 cm/-IVN + C + RTPreoperative lung and bone metastases decreased after treatment, no local recurrenceNED 2.3 yr
17[1]13 yrM-17 cm/1750 gIIIC + N + CNo recurrenceNED 2 yr
18[1]13 yrF--/-IIC+NUnknownUnknown
19[6]13 yrMR16 cm/666 gIIIN + C + RTAbd recurrence, lung and liver metastasesDOD 15y
20[1]15 yrFR10.5 cm/804 gINLocal recurrenceUnknown
21[1]17 yrFR-/1100 gIVResectionLung metastases, renal tumor found postmortemDOD 1.2 yr
22[7]22 yrFL9.5 cm/-INNo recurrenceNED 3 mo
23[8]24 yrFR22 cm/-IIN + C + RTNo recurrenceNED 2.5 yr
24127 yrFR18.4 cm /1680 gINLocal recurrence at retroperitoneum and liver metastasesDOD 26 mo
25[1]29 yrFR10 cm/--NUnknownUnknown
26[1]30 yrFR15 cm/409 g-N + CNo recurrenceNED 3 yr
27[1]35 yrFR7.5 cm/336 g-NUnknownUnknown
28[1]41 yrFL14 cm/250 gIN + CSpine, liver and lung metastasesDOD 2 yr
CONCLUSION

This case points out the features to differentiate ASK from other renal malignancies. The summary of the 28 reported cases also provided valuable information. Based on the lethal outcome in a 5-year old patient and two patients with stage 1 of the disease at presentation, we suggest that all patients with ASK should receive radical nephrectomy, en bloc resection of adjacent organs, chemotherapy, and long-term close follow-up. Further experience is essential to modify this approach in the future.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank Simone Yu for her professional English-editing and assisting in making the “audio core tip”.

Footnotes

Manuscript source: Unsolicited manuscript

Corresponding Author's Membership in Professional Societies: Taiwan Society of Nephrology (TSNS0874).

Specialty type: Medicine, research and experimental

Country/Territory of origin: Taiwan

Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification

Grade A (Excellent): A

Grade B (Very good): 0

Grade C (Good): C, C

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): 0

P-Reviewer: Hu X, Kamimura K, Tzamaloukas AHH S-Editor: Dou Y L-Editor: A E-Editor: Ma YJ

References
1.  Vujanić GM, Kelsey A, Perlman EJ, Sandstedt B, Beckwith JB. Anaplastic sarcoma of the kidney: a clinicopathologic study of 20 cases of a new entity with polyphenotypic features. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31:1459-1468.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 53]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 55]  [Article Influence: 3.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Wu MK, Cotter MB, Pears J, McDermott MB, Fabian MR, Foulkes WD, O'Sullivan MJ. Tumor progression in DICER1-mutated cystic nephroma-witnessing the genesis of anaplastic sarcoma of the kidney. Hum Pathol. 2016;53:114-120.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 27]  [Article Influence: 3.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Arabi H, Al-Maghraby H, Yamani A, Yousef Y, Huwait H. Anaplastic Sarcoma of the Kidney: A Rare Unique Renal Neoplasm. Int J Surg Pathol. 2016;24:556-561.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Gomi K, Hamanoue S, Tanaka M, Matsumoto M, Kitagawa N, Niwa T, Aida N, Kigasawa H, Tanaka Y. Anaplastic sarcoma of the kidney with chromosomal abnormality: first report on cytogenetic findings. Hum Pathol. 2010;41:1495-1499.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Wu MK, Goudie C, Druker H, Thorner P, Traubici J, Grant R, Albrecht S, Weber E, Charles A, Priest JR, Fabian MR, Foulkes WD. Evolution of Renal Cysts to Anaplastic Sarcoma of Kidney in a Child With DICER1 Syndrome. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016;63:1272-1275.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 27]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 26]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Watanabe N, Omagari D, Yamada T, Nemoto N, Furuya T, Sugito K, Koshinaga T, Yagasaki H, Sugitani M. Anaplastic sarcoma of the kidney: case report and literature review. Pediatr Int. 2013;55:e129-e132.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Chen CC, Liao KS. Anaplastic sarcoma of the kidney: Case report and literature review. Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019;31:129-132.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Labanaris A, Zugor V, Smiszek R, Nützel R, Kühn R. Anaplastic sarcoma of the kidney. ScientificWorldJournal. 2009;9:97-101.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Argani P, Faria PA, Epstein JI, Reuter VE, Perlman EJ, Beckwith JB, Ladanyi M. Primary renal synovial sarcoma: molecular and morphologic delineation of an entity previously included among embryonal sarcomas of the kidney. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24:1087-1096.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 183]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 165]  [Article Influence: 6.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Reed HM, Poppiti R, Sivina M. Malignant mesenchymoma of kidney and inferior vena cava. Urology. 1983;22:297-299.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Goldsby RE, Bruggers CS, Brothman AR, Sorensen PH, Beckwith JB, Pysher TJ. Spindle cell sarcoma of the kidney with ganglionic elements (malignant ectomesenchymoma) associated with chromosomal abnormalities and a review of the literature. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1998;20:160-164.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Oostveen RM, Pritchard-Jones K. Pharmacotherapeutic Management of Wilms Tumor: An Update. Paediatr Drugs. 2019;21:1-13.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Hol JA, Pritchard-Jones K, van Tinteren H, Furtwängler R, Verschuur AC, Vujanic GM, Leuschner I, Brok J, Rübe C, Smets AM, Janssens GO, Godzinski J, Ramírez-Villar GL, de Camargo B, Segers H, Collini P, Gessler M, Bergeron C, Spreafico F, Graf N; International Society of Paediatric Oncology – Renal Tumour Study Group (SIOP–RTSG). Position paper: Rationale for the treatment of Wilms tumour in the UMBRELLA SIOP-RTSG 2016 protocol. Nat Rev Urol. 2017;14:743-752.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 235]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 202]  [Article Influence: 28.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Doroudinia A, Ahmadi S, Mehrian P, Pourabdollah M. Primary Ewing sarcoma of the kidney. BMJ Case Rep. 2019;12.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]