Collision tumor of squamous cell carcinoma and neuroendocrine carcinoma in the head and neck: A case report

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are many disputes about the definition, diagnosis, therapy, and prognosis of collision tumors.

CASE SUMMARY

We describe a rare patient with a collision tumor consisting of neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus. She received operation, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and then two cycles of palliative chemotherapy. Follow-up at 12 mo after diagnosis showed that this patient experienced a complete response with no signs of recurrence or metastasis. A literature review of previous 26 cases diagnosed with collision tumor of NEC and SCC in the head and neck was also undertaken.

CONCLUSION

It is challenging to manage collision tumors because there are two morphologically and etiologically distinct tumors. Well-designed multimodality therapy including surgery and chemoradiotherapy might lead to a long survival in these patients.

Key Words: Collision tumor, Squamous carcinoma, Neuroendocrine carcinoma, Chemoradiotherapy, Head and neck, Case report

Core tip: It is rare to see collision carcinoma composed of squamous carcinoma and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) in the head and neck region. In this paper, we present a case of squamous cell carcinoma and NEC colliding in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus. Besides, 26 cases of collision carcinoma in the head and neck were also reviewed to further comprehend the multimodality therapy of collision carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION

Collision tumor of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) in the head and neck appears rare[1]. This type of tumor in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus is an even less likely occurrence[2]. A multidisciplinary approach including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy should be carefully designed once the diagnosis is confirmed. The real challenge is how to treat two synchronous malignancies. Here, we present a case of SCC and NEC colliding in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus to promote the understanding of collision carcinoma.

CASE PRESENTATION

Chief complaints

A 47-year-old female patient presented with frequent intermittent bleeding in the right nasal cavity for 6 mo.

History of present illness

The symptom of nosebleed was exacerbated with the passage of time. The patient had no fever, headache, chest tightness, or shortness of breath.

History of past illness

The patient used to be in good health. No history of major past illnesses was found.

Personal and family history

No relevant personal or family history was found.

Physical examination

No obvious abnormalities were found in physical examination.

Laboratory examinations

No obvious abnormalities were found in laboratory examinations.

Imaging examinations

A computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a 4.1 cm × 2.85 cm × 4.3 cm heterogenous mass of the right nasal and paranasal region, which invaded the nasal septum, right inferior middle turbinate, and right lateral wall of maxillary sinus bone, expanded to the right orbital base, and compressed the right internal rectus muscle and the right optic nerve (Figure 1). The neck and abdominal ultrasound showed no metastasis signs.

Figure 1 Images before surgery showing a mass in the nasal cavity and paranasal region.

FINAL DIAGNOSIS

Biopsy pathology of nasal mass specimen revealed poorly differentiated SCC with necrosis. Postoperative pathology of the specimen revealed poorly differentiated SCC with neuroendocrine carcinoma as a collision tumor (Figure 2A). CK5/6 was diffusely positive in the squamous differentiation area and negative in neuroendocrine differentiation cells (Figure 2B). P40 was also diffusely positive in the squamous differentiation area (Figure 2C). CD56 was positive in neuroendocrine components (Figure 2D and E). Chromogranin A and synaptophysin expression was negative (Figure 2E and F).

Figure 2 Immunohistochemical images. A: Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining showed typical squamous and neuroendocrine differentiation areas of the neoplasm; B: CK5/6 was diffusely positive in the squamous differentiation area and negative in neuroendocrine differentiation cells; C: P40 was diffusely positive in the squamous differentiation area; D: CD56 was positive in neuroendocrine components; E: Chromogranin A expression was negative; F: Synaptophysin expression was negative. Original magnification, × 200.

TREATMENT

She received operation in August 2018. A CT scan after the surgery revealed residual lesions in the primary tumor region (Figure 3A and B). Then concurrent chemoradiotherapy was performed with radiotherapy 68.0 Gy and chemotherapy of lobaplatin and VP-16 for four cycles. The chemotherapy regimen was lobaplatin (55 mg, day 1) and VP-16 (100 mg/m², day 1-3). Follow-up at 3 mo after completion of the full course of treatment showed that the patient experienced a complete response (Figure 3A and B).

Figure 3 The patient has a complete response after chemoradiotherapy. A: Images after surgery showing postoperative residual lesions (orange arrows); B: Images after surgery showing that a complete response was achieved; C: The latest positron emission tomography-computed tomography showing no signs of recurrence or metastasis.

OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

Positron emission tomography-CT taken in August 2019 (12 mo after diagnosis) revealed no signs of recurrence or metastasis (Figure 3C).

DISCUSSION

Different terms, including collision/mixed/composite/combined tumor, have been employed to describe tumor consisting of two malignant components. The more troublesome is that the definition of collision tumor has been a matter of debate for years. In 2000, the World Health Organization (WHO) classifications of tumors of endocrine organs suggested that collision tumors are those in which either component occupies at least 30% of the tumor tissues[3,4]. However, it might be an arbitrary criterion since the 30% cutoff has not been proven by reliable clinical data. The more malignant component in collision tumor, even if its share is less than 30%, tends to alter the biological behaviors. Furthermore, in the WHO classification of thyroid and lung tumors[5,6], mixed NEC and non-NEC tumors were not defined by a minimum percentage. We agree to the proposition of Yu et al[7] that collision carcinoma should meet the following conditions: Two malignant neoplasms of different pathological types derive simultaneously from the same location of human body and appear like a mass to the naked eye, with no evidence that one neoplasm migrates from the other.

According to our definition of collision tumor, we reviewed 26 well-documented cases of collision tumor of NEC and SCC in the head and neck from 1978 to 2019 (key words: Collision or mixed or composite or combined carcinoma, and the head and neck). Combining the data with our patient, the resulting group of 27 patients is large enough to allow some meaningful analysis. Of all cases, 23 were male and 4 were female. The sex ratio of men to women is 5.75:1, which displays a significant difference. The mean age of the 25 patients was 58.37 years (range: 32-83 years). Their clinical pathological features, treatments, and outcomes are summarized in Table 1. As to tumor sites, 20 (74.1%) originated from the larynx, 4 (14.8%) from the nasal and paranasal cavity, 1 from the palatine tonsil, and 1 from the soft palate. Fourteen (55.5%) patients were heavy smokers, which keeps consistent with the association between cigarette usage and head-neck cancer. Of all cases, 7 received surgery (S) alone; 7 received chemotherapy (C) and radiotherapy (R); 6 received S + R + C; 5 received S + R; 1 received S + C; and 1 received no treatment for high performance status (grade 3). Follow-up information was available for 23 patients (Table 1). Eight patients died of diseases (tumor) from 3.5 to 39 mo after diagnosis (mean survival, 24.1 mo), and 8 were clinically disease-free, from 6 to 60 mo (mean survival: 18.9 mo) following diagnosis. Seven patients were living with unresectable tumor, from 12 to 39 mo (mean survival, 28.8 mo), after diagnosis. There were only 2 patients who developed local relapse, and coincidentally, both of them received C + R treatment but no surgery. Four patients had recurrent regional lymph nodes metastases, 7 developed remote metastasis, including 3 affecting the bone, 1 lung, 1 lung and bone, 1 bone and liver, and 1 right breast mass.

Table 1 Summary of 27 cases of collision carcinoma of neuroendocrine carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck.

Ref.	Year	Sex/age	Site	Smoke	Treatment	Follow-up	Recurrence type
Eusebi et al[9]	1978	M/63	Larynx	Yes	S	DOD (24)	Regional
Gnepp et al[10]	1983	M/57	Larynx	Yes	S + R	DOD (3.5)	Bone
Gnepp et al[10]	1983	M/63	Larynx	Yes	S	DOD (24)	Regional
Mills et al[11]	1983	M/49	Larynx	Yes	S + R	AFD (6)
Ferlito et al[8]	1985	M/57	Larynx	Yes	S + R	DOD (3.5)	Bone
Ferlito et al[8]	1985	M/56	Larynx	Yes	C + R	AFD (60)
Ferlito et al[8]	1985	M/45	Larynx	Yes	C + R	DOD (21)
Ferlito et al[8]	1985	M/47	Larynx	Yes	C + R	AWD (39)	Lung
Ferlito et al[8]	1985	M/54	Larynx	Yes	S	AFD (24)
Chen et al[12]	1986	M/55	Larynx	No	S + R + C	DOD (9)	Bone, lung
Chen et al[12]	1986	M/56	Larynx	No	S + C	AWD (13)	Regional
Cosby et al[13]	1988	M/56	Larynx	Yes	S + R + C	uk
Gianoli et al[14]	1992	M/83	Larynx	Yes	S	AFD (8)
Yücel et al[15]	2000	M/32	Larynx	No	S + R + C	AWD (12)	Regional
Jaiswal et al[16]	2004	M/41	Larynx	Yes	C + R	AFD (8)
Barbeaux et al[17]	2006	M/61	Larynx	No	C + R	AWD (44)	Local
Barbeaux et al[17]	2006	F/54	Larynx	No	C + R	AWD (36)	Breast
Aggarwal et al[18]	2010	M/59	Larynx	Yes	S + R	uk
Kołodziej et al[19]	2010	M/59	Larynx	No	S	uk
Barham et al[2]	2013	F/83	Nasal cavity	No	S	AWD (13)	Bone
Kayakabe et al[20]	2014	F/80	Nasal cavity	No	None	DOD (5)
Franchi et al[21]	2015	M/75	Maxillary sinus	Yes	S + R	AFD (20)
Yamagata et al[22]	2016	M/65	The floor of the mouth	No	C + R	AWD (12)	Local
Nakano et al[23]	2017	M/59	Palatine tonsil	Yes	S + R + C	DOD (12)	Liver, bone
Udompatanakorn et al[24]	2018	M/59	Soft palate	No	S	uk
Yu et al[7]	2019	M/61	Larynx	No	S + R + C	AFD (13)
Our case	2019	F/47	Nasal cavity and paranasal sinus	No	S + R + C	AFD (12)

M: Male; F: Female; R: Radiotherapy; S: Surgery; C: Chemotherapy; R: Radiotherapy; DOD: Died of disease; AWD: Alive with disease; AFD: Alive free of disease; uk: Unknown.

One difficulty existing in collision tumor is to establish accurate preoperative diagnosis. To obtain two malignant neoplasms by single biopsy is like to kill two birds with one stone. A definite diagnosis most depends on careful microscopic observation of surgical specimens, especially with the application of immunohistochemistry. Another problem is that the outcome of collision tumor of SCC and NEC appear very poor. As far as we know, there have been two reports of collision carcinoma involving NEC and SCC in the nasal and paranasal region. However, it is the first case who achieved a complete response. Ferlito et al[8] raised the point that radical surgery takes little effect in improving local tumor control of collision tumor of the larynx. Besides, laryngectomy will result in voice loss and control only the primary lesion. Therefore, a combination of systematic chemotherapy and radiotherapy is recommended for small cell carcinoma. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines of Neuroendocrine Tumors (version 2015) suggest that patients with locoregional unresectable neuroendocrine tumors receive R + C; moreover, therapeutic manner of small cell carcinoma of the lung, which combined R with systemic chemotherapy, is worth learning.

Due to the rarity of collision carcinoma of NEC and SCC in the head and neck, the treatments should be carefully designed for two different malignancies. Our case indicated that high attention should be paid to the malignant degree of both components and individual characteristics, and certain patients may benefit from postoperative concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

In a word, we have described a case of collision carcinoma of SCC and NEC in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus. The existed literature of collision tumor in the head and neck region has been analyzed to understand this disease. Treatments including surgery and chemoradiotherapy may lead to a good survival for patients. More cases of collision carcinoma need to be reported and summarized.