Dorsal approach for isolated volar fracture-dislocation of the base of the second metacarpal: A case report

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We report a case with the displacement of an articular fracture fragment of the base of the second metacarpal from the ulnar to the volar side, treated via the dorsal approach. The dorsal approach can be a good option not only because it allows direct observation of ligament damage and fixation of bone fragments but also because the thin subcutaneous tissue makes the approach easier.

CASE SUMMARY

A 45-year-old man with a right hand injury visited the hospital. A small bone fragment was identified using plain radiography. Lateral radiography revealed the fragment as lying over the volar aspect of the carpometacarpal (CMC) joint. Computed tomography revealed that approximately one-third of the CMC joint surface of the second metacarpal was damaged. We provisionally diagnosed an intra-articular fracture with significant CMC joint instability and performed open reduction and internal fixation. We made a dorsal longitudinal incision over the CMC joint between the second and third metacarpals. The dorsal ligament of the third CMC joint was torn. We thought it had been dislocated to the volar side and spontaneously reduced to that position. There are only few reports of volar dislocation of CMC joint fractures, particularly of the second and third metacarpals; our report is unique as our patient had an intact interosseous ligament between the second and third metacarpals.

CONCLUSION

Although past reports have used a palmar approach, the dorsal approach is a good option for these cases.

Key Words: Metacarpal bone; Fracture-dislocation; Mechanism; Dorsal approach; Carpometacarpal joint; Case report

Core Tip: We report a case of displacement of an articular fracture fragment from the base of the second metacarpal from the ulnar to the volar side, treated via the dorsal approach. The dislocation mechanism was different from that in previously reported cases. The dorsal approach is a good option not only because it allows direct observation of ligament damage and fixation of bone fragments but also because the thin subcutaneous tissue makes the approach easier.

INTRODUCTION

Although several reports have described dislocation of the carpometacarpal (CMC) joints, volar dislocation has been rarely reported[1-6]. Dislocations of the CMC joints of the second and third metacarpals are extremely rare because of the strong ligamentous attachments and stable bony structures[7-13]. In cases of dislocation of these joints, closed reduction is typically attempted[7,11,13]. However, if bone fragments on the articular surface are displaced and remain on the volar side, surgery is required. We report a case with the displacement of an articular fracture fragment of the base of the second metacarpal from the ulnar to the volar side that was treated via the dorsal approach.

CASE PRESENTATION

Chief complaints

A 45-year-old man sustained an injury to his right hand at night. The next morning, he noticed some abrasions and experienced pain and swelling in his hand.

History of present illness

The patient visited an initial hospital where a doctor identified a small bone fragment in his hand using plain radiography. The precise mechanism of the injury was unknown because the patient had been heavily drunk at the time of the accident and remembered nothing. The patient was referred to our hospital since the doctor could not identify the origin of the bone fragment.

History of past illness

Nothing of note.

Personal and family history

Nothing of note.

Physical examination

The patient presented with severe swelling and tenderness over the CMC joint.

Imaging examinations

An anteroposterior radiograph showed a displaced fracture fragment between the bases of the second and third metacarpals (Figure 1A). On a lateral radiograph, the fragment was found to lie over the volar aspect of the CMC joint (Figure 1B). Computed tomography revealed that approximately one-third of the CMC joint surface of the second metacarpal was damaged (Figure 1C). In addition, we found small avulsion fragments on the dorsal aspects of the second to fourth metacarpal bases (Figure 1D).

Figure 1 Initial imaging examinations. A: The initial anteroposterior radiograph shows a displaced fracture fragment between the bases of the second and third metacarpals; B: The initial lateral radiograph shows the fragment lying over the volar aspect of the carpometacarpal joint; C: Coronal view of the initial reformatted multiplanar computed tomography image shows that approximately one-third of the carpometacarpal joint surface of the second metacarpal is damaged; D: Horizontal view of the initial computed tomography image shows small avulsion fragments on the dorsal aspect of the second to fourth metacarpal bases (orange arrows).

FINAL DIAGNOSIS

We provisionally diagnosed an intra-articular fracture with significant instability of the CMC joints and performed open reduction and internal fixation.

During surgery, we made a dorsal longitudinal incision over the CMC joint between the second and third metacarpals. The interosseous ligament between the second and third metacarpals was intact. The dorsal ligament of the third CMC joint was torn, the tendon of the extensor carpi radialis brevis was partially detached, and the third CMC joint showed some degree of instability (Figure 2). We considered that it had been dislocated to the volar side and then spontaneously reduced to that position.

Figure 2  Intraoperative macroscopic photo shows that the dorsal ligament of the third carpometacarpal joint (gray arrow) and the interosseous ligament between the third and fourth metacarpals are torn (white arrow).

TREATMENT

The fracture fragment could not be easily observed; thus, we divided the interosseous ligament between the second and third metacarpals partially, enlarged the metacarpal interspaces using the spreader, and then pulled out and reduced the fragment anatomically. The fragment was stabilized in an anatomical position using Kirschner wires (K-wires) (Figure 3A and B).

Figure 3 Postoperative radiographs. A: Anteroposterior postoperative radiograph shows that the fragment is reduced to its anatomical position and stabilized using Kirschner wires; B: Oblique postoperative radiograph shows that the fragment is reduced to its anatomical position and stabilized using Kirschner wires; C: Anteroposterior radiograph at postoperative 12 wk shows union of the second metacarpal fragments.

OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

The K-wires were removed 6 wk postoperatively, and the patient returned to full activities of daily living. Union of the second metacarpal was confirmed radiographically at 12 wk postoperatively (Figure 3C). At 9 mo postoperative, the patient’s disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand scores were as follows: Disability/symptom: 1.19, Sports/music: 0.00, and Work: 0.00.

DISCUSSION

We reported a case with the displacement of an articular fracture fragment of the base of the second metacarpal from the ulnar side to the volar side, which was treated via the dorsal approach. Although volar dislocations of the CMC joint fractures have been reported[1-13], only six reports focused on the second and third metacarpals[7-10,12,13]. Among these, three reports[7,8,13] described complete dislocations of the CMC joint. The findings in the remaining three cases[9,10,12] were similar to those in our case with spontaneous reduction of the dislocated CMC joint.

Thomas et al[9] reported a case of isolated fracture dislocation of the base of the second metacarpal with the displacement of the base fragment into the palm. The remaining articular surface of the index metacarpal, as well as the metacarpal shaft, was displaced slightly palmarly, and dorsal ligamentous disruption was observed via a dorsal approach.

Han et al[12] reported a case of isolated volar fracture-dislocation of the second metacarpal caused by indirect injury. The capsule and attached ligaments around the second CMC joint were torn, and the ulnar side of the CMC joint ligament was almost entirely torn. The injury was treated with an open reduction using a volar approach.

Takami et al[10] reported a case of displaced fracture of the ulnar condyle at the base of the second metacarpal without dislocation of the second CMC joint. It seems probable that the fracture was caused by simultaneous volar subluxation of the base of the third metacarpal, which reduced spontaneously with the disruption of the interosseous ligament between the second and third metacarpals. During surgery, they used a volar incision paralleling the thenar crease.

In the first two cases, the second metacarpal was displaced in a volar direction and reduced spontaneously. The findings in the third case were similar to those in our case: the third metacarpal was displaced in a volar direction, and the interosseous ligament between the second and third metacarpals was torn. However, in our case, the interosseous ligament between the second and third metacarpals was intact, and the ligament of the third CMC joint was torn. Therefore, the articular fracture of the second metacarpal was likely to have occurred due to the dislocation of the third metacarpal around it with the interosseous ligament as a hinge. Thus, the dislocation mechanism in this case was different from that in previously reported cases. The dorsal approach is a good for observing ligament damage.

Of the three similar cases, the two most recent cases were treated using the palmar approach. We treated this lesion via the dorsal approach. The dorsal approach can be safely used with thin subcutaneous tissue.

CONCLUSION

The dorsal approach is a good option for cases involving displacement of an articular fracture fragment from the ulnar side to the volar side, not only because it allows direct observation of ligament damage and fixation of bone fragments, but also because the thin subcutaneous tissue makes the approach easier.