Published online Oct 6, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i28.6871
Peer-review started: June 17, 2023
First decision: August 24, 2023
Revised: September 2, 2023
Accepted: September 11, 2023
Article in press: September 11, 2023
Published online: October 6, 2023
Processing time: 100 Days and 3.7 Hours
We report a case with the displacement of an articular fracture fragment of the base of the second metacarpal from the ulnar to the volar side, treated via the dorsal approach. The dorsal approach can be a good option not only because it allows direct observation of ligament damage and fixation of bone fragments but also because the thin subcutaneous tissue makes the approach easier.
A 45-year-old man with a right hand injury visited the hospital. A small bone fragment was identified using plain radiography. Lateral radiography revealed the fragment as lying over the volar aspect of the carpometacarpal (CMC) joint. Computed tomography revealed that approximately one-third of the CMC joint surface of the second metacarpal was damaged. We provisionally diagnosed an intra-articular fracture with significant CMC joint instability and performed open reduction and internal fixation. We made a dorsal longitudinal incision over the CMC joint between the second and third metacarpals. The dorsal ligament of the third CMC joint was torn. We thought it had been dislocated to the volar side and spontaneously reduced to that position. There are only few reports of volar dis
Although past reports have used a palmar approach, the dorsal approach is a good option for these cases.
Core Tip: We report a case of displacement of an articular fracture fragment from the base of the second metacarpal from the ulnar to the volar side, treated via the dorsal approach. The dislocation mechanism was different from that in previously reported cases. The dorsal approach is a good option not only because it allows direct observation of ligament damage and fixation of bone fragments but also because the thin subcutaneous tissue makes the approach easier.