Classification of hepatobiliary scintigraphy patterns in segmented gallbladder according to anatomical discordance

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) is a useful diagnostic imaging technique that uses radiotracers to evaluate the function of the gallbladder (GB) and biliary system. In segmented GB, some HBS images reveal a discordant GB boundary as compared to anatomical images.

AIM

To evaluate the characteristics of HBS in segmented GB and determine the clinical relevance according to HBS characteristics.

METHODS

A total of 268 patients with chronic cholecystitis, gallstones, or biliary colic symptoms who underwent HBS between 2011 and 2020 were enrolled. Segmented GB was defined as segmental luminal narrowing of the GB body on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) images, and HBS was examined 1 mo before or after CT or MR. Segmented GB was classified into 3 types based on the filling and emptying patterns of the proximal and distal segments according to the characteristics of HBS images, and GB ejection fraction (GBEF) was identified: Type 1 was defined as a normal filling and emptying pattern; Type 2 was defined as an emptying defect on the distal segment; and Type 3 was defined as a filling defect in the distal segment.

RESULTS

Segmented GB accounted for 63 cases (23.5%), including 36 patients (57.1%) with Type 1, 18 patients (28.6%) with Type 2, and 9 patients (14.3%) with Type 3 emptying pattern. Thus, approximately 43% of HBS images showed a discordant pattern as compared to anatomical imaging of segmented GB. Although there were no significant differences in clinical symptoms, rate of cholecystectomy, or pathological findings based on the type, most gallstones occurred in the distal segment. Reported GBEF was 62.50% ± 24.79% for Type 1, 75.89% ± 17.21% for Type 2, and 88.56% ± 7.20% for Type 3. Type 1 showed no difference in reported GBEF compared to the non-segmented GB group (62.50% ± 24.79% vs 67.40% ± 21.78%). In contrast, the reported GBEF was higher in Types 2 and 3 with defective emptying and filling when compared to Type 1 (80.11% ± 15.70% vs 62.57% ± 24.79%; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In segmented GB, discordance in the filling patterns detected by HBS and anatomical imaging could lead to misinterpretation of GBEF. For this reason, clinicians should be cautious when interpreting HBS results in patients with segmented GB.

Key Words: Gallbladder, Segmented, Gallbladder emptying, Radionuclide imaging, Misdiagnosis, Cholecystitis

Core Tip: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the clinical relevance of discrepancies between anatomical and hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) images in patients with segmented gallbladder (GB). HBS images of segmented GB were classified according to filling and emptying patterns: Type 1 was a normal pattern; Type 2 was an emptying defect on the distal segment; and Type 3 was a filling defect in the distal segment. Types 2 and 3 had higher GB ejection fraction measurements than Type 1. Therefore, clinicians should be cautious when interpreting the results of HBS in patients with segmented GB.

INTRODUCTION

The gallbladder (GB) is a single pear-shaped chamber mainly located in a shallow depression below the right lobe of the liver. The GB can be anatomically divided into 4 parts: Fundus, body, infundibulum, and neck. The neck is connected to the common bile duct via the cystic duct. The liver secretes approximately 600 mL of bile per day (0.4 mL/min)[1], a major portion of which enters the GB during fasting with the rest bypassing the GB and entering the duodenum. In the basal state, bile moves within the GB from the long central axis toward the periphery in a lamellar fashion within approximately 30 min[2].

A segmented GB refers to a hyperplastic condition of uncertain etiology in which the organ is divided into two chambers by a fold or septum[3,4]. Nevertheless, it is unknown how GB segmentation affects hepatic bile entry and exit from the two segments. Studies have demonstrated a relationship between segmented GB and the development of cholestasis[4]. A few studies have proposed a relationship between cholestasis and GB cancer[4-6]. Thus, it is hypothesized that segmented GB influences bile flow and as such may be associated with GB-related diseases. Therefore, cholecystectomy can be considered for the treatment of segmented GB.

Hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) is a diagnostic technique used in nuclear medicine to continuously capture the pattern of radiotracers ingested by hepatocytes and secreted together with bile acid. The radiotracer is administered intravenously, bound to albumin, transported to the liver, and drained into the duodenum through the GB and bile ducts. Normal hepatobiliary findings are characterized by the presence of hepatic parenchyma and rapid clearance of cardiac hematologic activity, followed sequentially by activities in the intrahepatic and extrahepatic biliary ductal system, GB, and upper small bowel within approximately 1 h[7]. Abdominal ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) can provide morphological information to aid in the diagnosis of hepatobiliary disease, whereas HBS can be used to delineate hepatic and GB function and the degree of cholestasis by tracking radiotracers in the bilirubin metabolic pathway into the bile duct[8].

HBS is used to assess the adequacy of GB contraction and calculate the GB ejection fraction (GBEF) to determine the need for surgery in patients with chronic cholecystitis and GB dyskinesia, and also in symptomatic patients without gallstones[8-11]. An absolute ejection fraction cutoff for surgery has not been definitively established, but has historically been suggested to be approximately 40%[10]. Because clinicians usually make the decision for surgery based on these results and patient symptoms, accurate measurement of GBEF is mandatory. However, it is generally accepted that scintigraphic findings are not always specific. Therefore, it is crucial to correlate HBS findings with clinical information and findings from other imaging modalities to arrive at optimal management strategy[7].

In segmented GB, changes in bile flow may affect HBS results. Some HBS images revealed discordant GB filling and emptying patterns when compared to anatomical images obtained using CT or MR techniques. Changes in these patterns may influence the interpretation of HBS findings and lead to miscalculation of GBEF. However, there are no studies on the clinical significance of HBS in segmented GB with a reasonable classification of the HBS pattern. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate HBS image features in a segmented GB and determine the clinical impact of these features.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study population and clinical information

We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent HBS at Jeonbuk National University Hospital from 2011 to 2020. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics on biliary colic symptoms (right upper quadrant and epigastric pain or discomfort or postprandial discomfort) and atypical abdominal symptoms (dyspepsia or abdominal discomfort in an uncertain location) were obtained. In addition, the presence and location of any gallstones, sludge, or polyps was assessed. Laboratory testing [alkaline phosphatase, gamma (γ)-glutamyl transferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, carcinoembryonic antigen, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9] was performed near the date of HBS. Morphological characteristics of the GB were verified by CT or MRCP. The interval between CT or MRCP and HBS was no longer than 1 mo. GBEF and scanned images of the radiotracers were validated using HBS. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Jeonbuk National University Hospital (IRB No. 2021-07-005).

Definition of segmented GB

A segmented GB was defined as segmental luminal narrowing of the GB body observed on CT or MR imaging. Segmented GB contains a fold or septum that divides the GB lumen into two or more interconnected compartments: A neck proximal to the stricture and a fundus distal to the stricture; determination of the presence of a septum and compartments is based on a review of CT or MR images. A new approach was proposed to define segmented GB (Figure 1). The segmented GB was first defined as:

Figure 1 Schematic of the segmented gallbladder. A: Long axis of the distal segment; B: Long axis of the proximal segment; C: Segmental luminal narrowing of the gallbladder (GB) body. Segmented GB was diagnosed if the sum of A and B was greater than 3 times C.

A + B > 3C

where A and B denote the long axes of the outer lumen of the distal and proximal portions, respectively. C is defined as the diameter of luminal narrowing based on the outer lumen of the GB body. This calculation was made after observing a segmented GB on CT or MR images and HBS images of an enrolled patient and measuring each GB area of that patient.

Hepatobiliary scintigraphy

After a minimum of 6 h of fasting, each patient received ^99mTc-mebrofenin intravenously while lying supine under a dual-head gamma camera fitted with a low-energy parallel-hole collimator, with a detector centered over the abdomen covering the region between the heart and pelvis in the field of view. GB phase images were obtained 60 min after ^99mTc-mebrofenin injection. Following a fatty meal, GB phase images were obtained at 30 and 60 min. GBEF was measured using immediate pre- and post-fatty meal images, and the regions of interest were drawn around the GB (considering the patient’s movement) and adjacent liver (background). The GBEF was calculated as the ratio of the difference between the maximum and minimum signals to the maximum signal and corrected for the background signal[7].

Classification of a segmented GB based on HBS

Baseline images used for classification were those obtained 60 min after ^99mTc-mebrofenin injection and the GB phase obtained 30 min and 60 min after fatty meal intake. HBS images were compared with CT or MR images and classified into 3 groups according to the filling and emptying patterns according to the actual anatomical morphology of the GB. Type 1 was defined as a normal filling and emptying pattern, Type 2 was defined as an emptying defect on the distal segment, and Type 3 was defined as a filling defect in the distal segment (Figure 2). Figure 3 depicts the anatomical boundaries of segmented GB as shown in typical CT images, the scanned images of HBS in normal GB, and each segmented GB subtype classified according to the filling and emptying pattern.

Figure 2 Schematic of the classification of filling and emptying patterns in segmented gallbladder as measured by hepatobiliary scintigraphy. A: Type 1 was defined as a normal filling and emptying pattern; B: Type 2 was defined as an emptying defect at the distal segment; C: Type 3 was defined as a filling defect at the distal segment. GB: gallbladder; HBS: Hepatobiliary scintigraphy.

Figure 3 Typical images of computed tomography and hepatobiliary scintigraphy according to pattern in the normal and segmented gallbladder. A: Hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) in non-segmented gallbladder (GB). Reported GB ejection fraction (GBEF) was 74%; B: Type 1, normal filling and emptying pattern on HBS. Reported GBEF (95%) was reflected in both segments; C: Type 2, emptying defect of the distal segment on HBS. After 60 min, the proximal segment showed normal emptying, but the distal segment showed poor emptying. Reported GBEF (87%) reflects proximal segmentation more than distal segmentation; D: Type 3, filling defect of the distal segment on HBS. As the distal segment is not observed in the scanned image, other radiological validation is required. Reported GBEF (89%) reflects only proximal segmentation. The green line is a rough representation of the outline of the gallbladder per computed tomography. GB: gallbladder; P: Proximal segment (orange arrows); D: Distal segment (black arrows).

Statistical analysis

Results were reported as numbers (percentages) or as mean ± standard deviation. Continuous variables were compared using the Student’s t-test, and categorical data were compared using Pearson’s chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 25.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, United States).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics

A total of 268 adult patients 18 years or older underwent HBS for chronic cholecystitis, gallstones, or biliary colic. The patients’ baseline characteristics are listed in Table 1. The mean age was 51.65 years ± 13.10 years and men constituted 43.2% of the study population. Approximately 20% of patients complained of biliary colic pain. Among these, 63 (23.51%) belonged to the segmented GB group. There were no differences in laboratory findings between the non-segmented and segmented GB groups. Based on radiological findings, adenomyomatosis and chronic cholecystitis were diagnosed more frequently in the segmented GB group (18/63, 28.6% and 45/63, 71.4%, respectively) than in the non-segmented GB group (12/205, 5.9% and 107/205, 52.2%, respectively) (P < 0.001 and P = 0.009, respectively). Reported GBEF was 68.01% ± 22.05%, and there was no difference between the two groups (61.70% ± 21.78% vs 70.05% ± 22.97%; P = 0.405). Cholecystectomy was performed more frequently in the segmented GB group (45/63, 71.4%) than in the non-segmented GB group (73/205, 35.6%; P < 0.001).

Table 1 Comparison of baseline characteristics between patients of non-segmented and segmented gallbladder groups.

Variables		Non-segmented GB, n = 205	Segmented GB, n = 63	P value
Age in year		51.8 ± 13.6	51.1 ± 11.3	0.664
Male		87 (42.4%)	29 (46.0%)	0.72
Atypical symptoms		52 (25.4%)	9 (14.3%)	0.085
Biliary colic pain		50 (24.4%)	10 (15.9%)	0.171
Laboratory findings
	ALP in IU/L	67.6 ± 24.6	68.0 ± 20.5	0.911
	GGT in IU/L	37.1 ± 54.9	33.1 ± 28.4	0.58
	AST in IU/L	24.2 ± 8.7	26.3 ± 14.7	0.163
	ALT in IU/L	23.5 ± 12.7	26.3 ± 15.4	0.148
	Total bilirubin in mg/dL	1.05 ± 2.60	0.86 ± 0.41	0.583
	Direct bilirubin in mg/dL	0.31 ± 0.87	0.25 ± 0.12	0.59
	CEA in ng/mL	1.58 ± 1.31	1.35 ± 0.83	0.31
Radiologic findings
	GB stone	110 (53.7%)	37 (58.7%)	0.563
	GB sludge	7 (3.4%)	2 (3.2%)	0.999
	GB polyp	14 (6.8%)	8 (12.7%)	0.186
	Adenomyomatosis	12 (5.9%)	18 (28.6%)	< 0.001
	Chronic cholecystitis	107 (52.2%)	45 (71.4%)	0.009
Reported GBEF, %		67.40 ± 21.78	70.05 ± 22.97	0.405
Cholecystectomy		73 (35.6%)	45 (71.4%)	< 0.001
Pathology1
	Adenomyomatosis	3 (4.1%)	5 (11.1%)	0.257
	Chronic cholecystitis	68 (93.2%)	41 (91.1%)	0.73
	Cholesterol polyp	16 (21.9%)	7 (15.6%)	0.478

¹Duplicate test results.

Data were expressed as n (percentage) or mean ± SD. Comparisons were performed using the Student’s t-test, Pearson’s chi-squared test, and Fisher’s exact test. ALP: Alkaline phosphatase; ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; AST: Aspartate aminotransferase; CA19-9: Carbohydrate antigen 19-9; CEA: Carcinoembryonic antigen; GB: Gallbladder; GBEF: Gallbladder ejection fraction; GGT: Gamma (γ)-gamma-glutamyl transferase.

Clinical characteristics of variables according to the type of segmented GB

According to the HBS patterns defined for segmented GB, 36 patients (57.1%) with Type 1, 18 patients (28.6%) with Type 2, and 9 patients (14.3%) with Type 3 were identified. A comparison of variables according to the type of segmented GB is presented in Table 2. Demographic, radiological, and pathological findings did not differ according to the type of segmented GB. In addition, the rates of atypical symptoms and biliary colic pain did not differ between the groups. GB stones occurred more frequently in the distal segment in both groups; however, no significant intergroup difference was found. Type 1, with normal emptying and filling patterns, showed no difference in the reported GBEF compared to the non-segmented GB group. Interestingly, the reported GBEF was higher in Types 2 and 3 with defective emptying and filling than in Type 1 (80.11% ± 15.70% vs 62.57% ± 24.79%; P = 0.001).

Table 2 Comparison of variables according to type of segmented gallbladder.

Variables			Type 1, n = 36	Types 2 & 3, n = 27	P value
Age in year			50.2 ± 9.6	52.3 ± 13.2	0.483
Male			14 (38.9%)	15 (55.6%)	0.212
Atypical symptoms			4 (11.1%)	5 (18.5%)	0.48
Biliary colic pain			7 (19.4%)	3 (11.1%)	0.494
Radiological findings
	GB stone		22 (61.1%)	15 (55.6%)	0.797
	Location of GB stone				0.147
		Proximal	5 (22.7%)	0 (0.0%)	0.067
		Distal	15 (68.2%)	13 (86.7%)	0.262
		Both	2 (9.1%)	2 (13.3%)	0.999
	GB sludge		1 (2.8%)	1 (3.7%)	0.999
	GB polyp		5 (13.9%)	3 (11.1%)	0.999
	Adenomyomatosis		10 (27.8%)	8 (29.6%)	0.999
	Chronic cholecystitis		25 (69.4%)	20 (74.1%)	0.782
Reported GBEF, %			62.50 ± 24.79	80.11 ± 15.70	< 0.001
Cholecystectomy			26 (72.2%)	19 (70.4%)	0.999
Pathology1
	Adenomyomatosis		3 (11.5%)	2 (10.5%)	0.999
	Chronic cholecystitis		24 (92.3%)	17 (89.5%)	0.999
	Cholesterol polyp		4 (15.4%)	3 (15.8%)	0.999

¹Duplicate test results.

Data are expressed as number (percentage) or mean ± SD. GB: Gallbladder; GBEF: Gallbladder ejection fraction.

The reported GBEF was 62.50% ± 24.79% for Type 1, 75.89% ± 17.21% for Type 2, and 88.56% ± 7.20% for Type 3 (Figure 4). Notably, a significant difference was observed between the reported GBEF of Types 1 and 3 (P = 0.005). The mean GBEF trended toward being higher in Type 2 than in Type 1, but the difference was not significant (P = 0.082).

Figure 4 Gallbladder ejection fraction in non-segmented gallbladder and segmented gallbladder subtypes. Reported gallbladder ejection fraction (GBEF) in non-segmented gallbladder (GB) was 67.40% ± 21.78%, whereas that of segmented GB was 62.50% ± 24.79% for Type 1, 75.89% ± 17.21% for Type 2, and 88.56% ± 7.20% for Type 3. ^aThere was a significant difference between reported GBEF of Types 1 and 3; ^bThe difference in GBEF of Types 1 and 2 was not statistically significant (P = 0.082). GB: Gallbladder; GBEF: Gallbladder ejection fraction.

DISCUSSION

The segmentation of the GB into two chambers by a fold or septum is a hyperplastic condition of uncertain etiology[3,4]. GB segmentation in adults is often attributed to adenomyomatosis or congenital septa[12,13]. The term segmented GB is used in a broader fashion to include segmental adenomyosis of the GB. This term is not commonly used; however, GB segmentation without adenomyomatosis is often observed in imaging studies of patients of any age. Krishnamurthy et al[14] reported that microscopic examination of a segmented GB revealed chronic inflammatory changes, fibrosis, and wall thickening[14]. The strictures caused by the annular thickening of the GB wall may be narrow[2]. The anatomical stricture of a segmented GB leads to difficult bile movement and causes cholestasis, which may lead to chronic inflammatory changes, cholelithiasis, and tumorigenesis[4,5,13]. Therefore, clinical symptoms and the patient’s physiological status should be considered; however, surgical treatment is recommended in the management of segmented GB.

Gallstones are one of the most common biliary tract diseases, and its prevalence is estimated at 5.9%-21.9% in the West and 3.1%-10.7% in Asia[15]. Diagnosis of gallstones is often incidental, and most patients remain asymptomatic throughout their lives. During a follow-up period of 10–15 years, symptoms appear in approximately 15%–25% of patients, and the risk of developing biliary pain due to complications is reported to be approximately 2%–3% annually[16-18]. Patients with symptomatic gallstones are at high risk of gallstone-related complications, and cholecystectomy is recommended in such cases[19]. In addition, cholecystectomy is recommended if there are risk factors for GB cancer [e.g., anomalous pancreatic ductal drainage, GB adenoma, porcelain GB, or large gallstones (especially those larger than 3 cm)][20-22]. However, if a patient with gallstones has ambiguous symptoms, it is often difficult to distinguish gallstone-related symptoms; therefore, blood tests, ultrasound, HBS, and the patient's personal circumstances are considered to determine the need for surgery.

HBS is a radionuclide diagnostic imaging modality that is used to evaluate hepatocellular function and the biliary system by tracing the synthesis and flow of bile from the liver and its passage through the biliary system into the small intestine[7]. The technique assesses the function of hepatocytes, the patency and integrity of the biliary ducts, GB contractility, and sphincter of Oddi function[23]. HBS has frequently been used to investigate the physiological parameters of the GB during emptying and filling[24]. A reduced GBEF is observed in calculous and acalculous biliary diseases, such as chronic acalculous cholecystitis, biliary dyskinesia, and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. It may also be associated with various nonbiliary diseases and conditions as well as with the use of various medications (e.g., morphine, atropine, calcium channel blockers, octreotide, etc)[7,25]. To this end, a meta-analysis concluded that the utility of a low GBEF in deciding whether to perform cholecystectomy in individuals with GB dyskinesia is still unclear[10]. However, the reduced GBEF in HBS has been advocated as a diagnostic parameter for the clinical evaluation of individuals presenting with suspected biliary pain or gallstones and altered GB morphology (such as segmented GB) in deciding whether to proceed with cholecystectomy.

The GBEF as evaluated in this study did not differ between patients with segmented or non-segmented GB. In a previous study, the GBEF measured in segmented GB was lower than that in non-segmented GB[14]. In this study, we observed the appearance of partial filling and emptying events in each lumen in segmented GB using HBS imaging. The anatomical features of annular strictures in segmented GB may alter the emptying of radiotracers without completely replenishing them. Defective HBS images in segmented GB have been reported[26]; however, they have never been classified according to filling and emptying patterns on scanned images. HBS images were divided into three categories. Type 1 was defined as a normal filling and emptying pattern. Type 2 was defined as emptying defects in the distal portion, and Type 3 was characterized by filling defects in the distal portion.

Furthermore, GBEF varied across segmented GB types depending on the HBS imaging pattern. We have described GBEF as "reported GBEF" because GBEF may be incorrectly measured depending on the type. We measured GBEF in Type 1 as 62.50%, with higher measured GBEF in Types 2 and 3 with defective filling or emptying (P = 0.001). Filling or emptying defects in HBS images of a segmented GB are attributable to the undesirable effects of bile flow. However, the higher GBEF of Types 2 and 3 compared with that of Type 1 renders the results unreliable and inconsistent with those of a previous study of 7 patients with segmented GB analyzed via HBS[14]. In this study, the total GBEF was determined by measuring the ejection fraction (EF) of the proximal and distal segments of the GB using HBS. Distal EF was lower in the segmented GB group than the proximal EF. The total EF in the segmented GB group was also lower than that in the non-segmented GB group. However, in the non-segmented GB group (n = 10), distal EF was higher than proximal EF. Decreased emptying (low EF) of the distal segment indicates that the septum acts as a one-way valve, allowing normal bile entry into the distal segment, but does not allow an easy exit. However, the total GBEF of segmented GB measured in our hospital was often good, suggesting normal GB contractility. This phenomenon indicates that the measurement of total GBEF via HBS in segmented GB does not reflect the actual contractility of the organ. Total GBEF in Types 2 and 3 was primarily measured based on the contractility of the proximal part rather than the overall contractility as the GB boundary was not adequately demonstrated in the HBS images.

Changes in bile acid filling and emptying and the effect of the segmented GB on GBEF can be determined from the location of gallstones. GB stones were located mainly in the distal part and were related to the contraction and imbalance of the bile flow between the two segments. Nishimura et al[4] investigated the association between segmental adenomyomatosis of the GB and gallstones[4]. In addition, the contribution of gallstones to adenomyomatosis was investigated by examining their components. According to this study, the incidence of gallstones was higher in segmental adenomyomatosis than in fundal and diffuse adenomyomatosis, and distal compartment stones were detected in 80.6% (58/72). In our study, 75.7% (28/37) of stones were found in distal segments, 10.8% (4/37) in both segments, and only 13.5% (5/37) in the proximal segment of segmented GB. Although the size or composition of gallstones was not investigated in our study, the narrowed passageway was considered to obstruct the flow of bile and facilitate the production of gallstones at the distal part of the segmented GB.

The total GBEF (80.11% ± 15.70%) of the groups with defective filling or emptying (Types 2 and 3) suggested an overestimation of the proximal portion compared with the normal filling and emptying group (62.57% ± 24.79%). The difference between the groups underscores the need to interpret the HBS results in segmented GB in combination with GB morphology assessed by other imaging modalities (US, CT, or MRCP).

This study had some limitations. Our study was a relatively small, single-center cohort study. In addition, EFs of the proximal and distal GB were not investigated, which precluded the determination of the contribution of each GB part to total EF. The filling and emptying radiotracer volume of bile flow could not be confirmed; therefore, no quantitative results could be reported. However, quantitative studies require the use of single-photon emission CT. Lastly, non-specific fatty meals were used to stimulate GB contraction, as cholecystokinin (CCK) was unavailable for use at our institute. Although CCK would have offered a more reliable GB stimulus, a previous study did not show any significant difference between CCK and fatty meals in measuring GBEF[27].

Despite these limitations, our findings provide a better understanding of the results of HBS in segmented GB. Clinically, segmented GB is associated with a higher incidence of GB-related diseases than are other morphological features. Therefore, cholecystectomy is often indicated for the surgical treatment of segmented GB. In addition to the assessment of patient symptoms, reduced contractility in segmented GB measured by HBS is critical in determining the need for cholecystectomy. However, GBEF measurement in segmented GB may be misinterpreted depending on the type of HBS images. In particular, the GBEF in Type 2 and Type 3 HBS scans can be overestimated, which can complicate the development of an ideal treatment plan.

CONCLUSION

In segmented GB, discordance between HBS and anatomical imaging (CT or MR techniques) could lead to inaccurate estimation of GBEF. Therefore, clinicians should be cautious when interpreting GB contractility as measured by HBS in patients with segmented GB.

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

Research background

Hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) is a useful diagnostic imaging technique that uses radioactive tracers to evaluate the function of the gallbladder (GB) and biliary tract. In segmented GB, some HBS images show inconsistent GB boundaries as compared to anatomical imaging, limiting the evaluation of GB contractility through HBS.

Research motivation

Cholecystectomy is sometimes necessary in patients with gallstones or chronic cholecystitis. In addition, in the case of anatomically segmented GB, cholecystectomy is recommended due to the higher risk of future GB disease. Because there are patients who are reluctant to undergo cholecystectomy, cholecystectomy is recommended again if cholecystectomy decreases after evaluating the GB contractability using HBS. In previous studies, the GB ejection fraction (GBEF) was reduced in the case of segmental GB, but GBEF was often normal when measured in our study.

Research objectives

We evaluated the characteristics of HBS in segmented GB and investigated the effect of segmented GB on the measurement of GBEF using HBS.

Research methods

From a larger group of patients with chronic cholecystitis, gallstones, or biliary colic, those who underwent HBS were identified. Patients with segmented GB features with segmental lumen stricture were identified using computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Patients were asked whether CT or MR was performed either 1 mo before or after HBS. Segmented GB was classified into 3 types based on the filling and emptying patterns of the proximal and distal segments according to the characteristics of HBS images, and GBEF was measured. Type 1 was defined as a normal filling and emptying pattern, Type 2 was defined as an emptying defect on the distal segment, and Type 3 was defined as a filling defect in the distal segment.

Research results

Segmented GB accounted for 63 cases (23.5%), including 36 patients (57.1%) with Type 1, 18 patients (28.6%) with Type 2, and 9 patients (14.3%) with Type 3. Thus, approximately 43% of segmented GB cases demonstrated discordance between HBS and anatomical imaging. Although there were no significant differences in clinical symptoms, rate of cholecystectomy, or pathological findings based on the type, most gallstones occurred in the distal segment. Reported GBEF was 62.50% ± 24.79% for Type 1, 75.89% ± 17.21% for Type 2, and 88.56% ± 7.20% for Type 3. Type 1 showed no difference in reported GBEF as compared to the non-segmented GB group (62.50% ± 24.79% vs 67.40 ± 21.78%). In contrast, the reported GBEF was higher in Types 2 and 3 with defective emptying and filling than in Type 1 (80.11% ± 15.70% vs 62.57% ± 24.79%; P = 0.001).

Research conclusions

In segmented GB, discordance between HBS and anatomical imaging (CT or MR) could lead to inaccurate estimation of GBEF. Therefore, clinicians should use caution when interpreting GB contractility through HBS in patients with segmented GB.

Research perspectives

Since the presence or absence of gallstones may affect HBS, additional studies may be conducted to examine the difference in GBEF according to the presence or absence of gallstones in patients with segmented GB. Further studies using single-photon emission CT to evaluate discrepancies between HBS and anatomical imaging are expected to help determine the need for cholecystectomy.