Diagnostic accuracy of ≥ 16-slice spiral computed tomography for local staging of colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Figure 1 Literature search and results.

Figure 2 Forest plot of meta-analysis of studies using ≥ 16-slice computed tomography for colorectal cancer T staging. A: Receiver operating characteristic plan; B: Forest plot of diagnostic odds ratio; C: Forest plot of sensitivity; D: Forest plot of specificity.

Figure 3 Forest plot of meta-analysis of studies using ≥ 16-slice computed tomography for colorectal cancer T staging. A: Positive LR; B: Negative LR; C: Summary receiver operating characteristic curve; D: Deeks' funnel plot.

Figure 4 Pooled effect plot of ≥ 16-slice computed tomography for colorectal cancer N staging. A: Receiver operating characteristic plan; B: Diagnostic odds ratio.

Figure 5 Forest plot of summary effect of ≥ 16-slice computed tomography for colorectal cancer N staging. A: Sensitivity; B: Specificity; C: Positive LR; D: Negative LR.

Figure 6 Summary receiver operating characteristic curve of ≥ 16-slice computed tomography for colorectal cancer N staging.