Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 6, 2021; 9(1): 36-46
Published online Jan 6, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i1.36
Modified procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids: Lower recurrence, higher satisfaction
Yan-Yu Chen, Yi-Fan Cheng, Quan-Peng Wang, Bo Ye, Chong-Jie Huang, Chong-Jun Zhou, Mao Cai, Yun-Kui Ye, Chang-Bao Liu
Yan-Yu Chen, Yi-Fan Cheng, Quan-Peng Wang, Chong-Jie Huang, Chong-Jun Zhou, Mao Cai, Yun-Kui Ye, Chang-Bao Liu, Department of Anorectal Surgery, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang Province, China
Bo Ye, Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, State University of New York at Albany, Albany, NY 12206, United States
Author contributions: Chen YY performed most of the data analysis and wrote this paper; Huang CJ , Zhou CJ and Cai M performed the clinical therapy, advised the performance of the study and provided the curative effect evaluation system; Cheng YF and Wang QP completed the postoperative follow-up; Ye B performed the final data review and was responsible for the data’s reliability; Ye YK performed the clinical treatment work; Liu CB designed the study, completed the majority of clinical treatment work and was responsible for the reliability of the paper.
Institutional review board statement: The study was reviewed and approved for publication by the Ethics Committee of the 2nd Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University.
Informed consent statement: Written informed consent was obtained from the study participants.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All of the authors have no conflict of interest related to the manuscript.
Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.
STROBE statement: The authors have read the STROBE statement—checklist of items, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the STROBE statement—checklist of items.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Chang-Bao Liu, MD, PhD, Chief Physician, Department of Anorectal Surgery, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, No. 109 Xueyuanxi Street, Lucheng District, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang Province, China. liucbwmu@163.com
Received: July 29, 2020
Peer-review started: July 29, 2020
First decision: September 30, 2020
Revised: October 27, 2020
Accepted: November 9, 2020
Article in press: November 9, 2020
Published online: January 6, 2021
Processing time: 156 Days and 1.9 Hours
Core Tip

Core Tip: In total, 1163 patients were treated for severe prolapsed hemorrhoids using modified procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (M-PPH), conventional hemorrhoidectomy, or Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. The short-term postoperative complications, postoperative anal dysfunction and therapeutic effects of the three treatment methods were compared. M-PPH has many advantages compared to traditional surgical treatments, including a higher degree of effectiveness, a significantly lower recurrence rate than the original PPH, and a higher rate of patient satisfaction.