Published online May 6, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i13.3008
Peer-review started: February 18, 2021
First decision: March 7, 2021
Revised: March 9, 2021
Accepted: March 12, 2021
Article in press: March 12, 2021
Published online: May 6, 2021
Processing time: 63 Days and 1.6 Hours
Sepsis is always associated with high mortality. Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment help to improve outcomes. Like markers such as body temperature, leukocyte count, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin as well as tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-10, and HLA-DR expression, hemodynamic indices guide clinicians to make a reasonable decision. However, no specific markers for sepsis have been identified.
Hemodynamic monitoring is essential to the care of septic patients. By assessing the hemodynamic indices, patient condition is determined so that timely subsequent interventions will be given accordingly. Whether its role is as important as the above-mentioned markers or factors in the management of sepsis? The present study reported the performance of hemodynamic indices for predicting the outcomes including risk of shock and mortality in septic patients.
To discuss the potential predictive and prognostic value of hemodynamic indices for relevant clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis.
Hemodynamic indices were monitored in patients with sepsis, including heart rate (HR), cardiac index (CI), mean arterial pressure (MAP), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), central venous pressure (CVP), and central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2). The differences in hemodynamic indices were compared between patients with shock and patients without shock and between non-survivors and survivors.
The results revealed that HR, CI, MAP, SVRI, and CVP were higher in septic shock patients and non-survivors than in non-shock patients and survivors. However, ScvO2 was lower in septic shock patients and non-survivors than in non-shock patients and survivors.
Patients with high HR, CI, MAP, SVRI, and CVP levels and low ScvO2 level probably develop severe disease or experience worsening disease. Hemodynamic indices may have predictive value for the outcomes and prognosis in patients with sepsis.
Recently, studies showed that static measures were replaced by dynamic measures for the prediction of fluid responsiveness and cardiac performance. In view of this, studies in the future should take the dynamic markers into consideration.