Published online Jul 6, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i13.1599
Peer-review started: January 29, 2019
First decision: March 14, 2019
Revised: April 10, 2019
Accepted: May 1, 2019
Article in press: May 1, 2019
Published online: July 6, 2019
Processing time: 158 Days and 8.6 Hours
There is a close relationship between cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Tra-nsjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has a good clinical effect in treating the complication of portal hypertension. Because of the risk of postoperative liver failure, severe complications, and low survival rate for HCC, TIPS is contraindicated in patients with portal hypertension and liver cancer. We studied a large cohort of patients with cirrhosis and HCC who underwent TIPS for recurrent variceal bleeding and/or ascites. They were compared with patients with cirrhosis and HCC who did not undergo TIPS placement. We conclude that TIPS combined with palliative treatment is safe and effective for portal hypertension in patients with HCC.
Liver cancer is often accompanied by cirrhosis, which often leads to the occurrence of liver cancer. TIPS can reduce portal pressure and relieve the clinical symptoms associated with various medical conditions. Because of the risk of postoperative liver failure, severe complications, and low survival rate for HCC, TIPS is contraindicated in patients with portal hypertension and liver cancer. We conducted a retrospective analysis of portal hypertension and liver cancer that were treated in our hospital with TIPS plus palliative treatment and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and liver cancer patients treated with palliative treatment and RFA in order to compare the safety, efficacy, and survival rate between the two groups. In the future, randomized controlled trials are needed to verify our results.
The main objective of our study was to confirm our hypothesis that TIPS combined with palliative treatment and RFA for patients with HCC and portal hypertension is safe and effective, and it increases the survival rate of the patients.
We conducted a retrospective study to compare the clinical efficacy of the combination of TIPS, transarterial TACE, RFA, and palliative treatment in liver cirrhosis complicated with HCC. The patients were divided into two groups. Group A comprised 217 patients with portal hypertension and HCC who were treated with TIPS plus palliative treatment and RFA. Group B comprised a cohort of 136 patients with HCC and portal hypertension who did not undergo TIPS placement and received palliative treatment and RFA. A logistic regression analysis was performed for the variables. The differences between the groups were compared using one-way analysis of variance followed by least significant difference t tests. Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and compared using χ2 tests. Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05. The statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 21.0 (SPSS, Armonk, NY, United States).
This study showed that TIPS combined with palliative treatment and RFA for patients with HCC and portal hypertension is safe. Mean survival and median survival were longer than in the group without TIPS treatment, which verified our hypothesis.
TIPS combined with palliative treatment and RFA for patients with HCC and portal hypertension is safe and effective, and it prolongs the survival of the patients. We suggest that for patients with HCC and portal hypertension, TIPS procedure is not contraindicated in such circumstances of variceal bleeding and/or ascites. Patients with HCC and portal hypertension can be treated with TIPS procedure in future clinical practice.
Based on the findings in this study that TIPS combined with palliative treatment and RFA for patients with HCC and portal hypertension is safe and effective and that it prolongs the survival of patients, patients with HCC and portal hypertension can be treated with TIPS. In future research, randomized controlled trials are needed to verify our results.