Published online Dec 26, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i16.1146
Peer-review started: October 10, 2018
First decision: November 1, 2018
Revised: November 9, 2018
Accepted: November 23, 2018
Article in press: November 24, 2018
Published online: December 26, 2018
Processing time: 75 Days and 20.6 Hours
Sedation is performed in many centres during the colonoscopy procedure. However, since there are a limited number of anaesthesiologists, there are centres where colonoscopy is performed without sedation. In the literature, there are several studies in which colonoscopy sedation is performed without anaesthesia personnel. In this study, we aim to evaluate the patient satisfaction and the side effects of colonoscopy sedation performed by endoscopy nurse with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump.
In studies where colonoscopy sedation is performed under the supervision of a nurse, propofol is often used alone or in combination with agents such as fentanyl, meperidine or midazolam. Ketamine, which protects spontaneous breathing and protective airway reflexes by providing dissociative anaesthesia, is not used in adult colonoscopy patients. In our study, we wanted to determine the advantages and disadvantages of ketamine in combination with propofol and midazolam without anaesthesia personnel during colonoscopy.
It is aimed to perform ketamine-midazolam-propofol sedation with minimum side effects and to obtain the best patient satisfaction under the supervision of a nurse in low-risk colonoscopy patients. Individual dose errors were minimized by using a PCA pump.
Sixty American Statistical Association (ASA) I-II patients who underwent colonoscopy were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups [sedation under the supervision of anaesthetist (SSA) and sedation under the supervision of endoscopy nurse (SSEN)]. Both groups were initially administered 1 mg midazolam, 50 mg ketamine, and 30-50 mg propofol. The required dose of propofol in the SSA group was then determined and administered by the anaesthesiologist. In the SSEN group, the continuation of sedation was carried out by the nurse with PCA pump. Data such as patient satisfaction, incidence of side effects, total drug consumption, and procedure duration were recorded, and differences among the groups were evaluated.
There were no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) between the two groups in terms of patient satisfaction, the rate of re-preference for the same method in case of repeat endoscopy, and the side effects. Total propofol consumption in the SSEN group was significantly higher (P < 0.05), whereas the systolic and diastolic pressure values were significantly lower (P < 0.05) at 5 min and after 8 min. Reaching the cecum and total procedure time were significantly longer (P < 0.05) in the SSEN group. There were no significant prolonged side effects in either group.
In ASA I-II patients, sedation under the supervision of nurses with PCA pump in colonoscopy has similar side effects and patient satisfaction levels as sedation under SSA.
There is a need for further studies with ASA III-IV patients and also with more patients.