Published online Dec 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i34.12532
Peer-review started: June 17, 2022
First decision: July 29, 2022
Revised: August 10, 2022
Accepted: November 8, 2022
Article in press: November 8, 2022
Published online: December 6, 2022
Processing time: 168 Days and 7.2 Hours
Regions of unexpected hypermetabolism were not rare findings on fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (F-18 FDG PET/CT). There are studies on the incidentally identified FDG uptake and some suggested a high possibility of malignancy.
A confirmation of high malignancy rate in incidentally observed focal FDG uptake may assist physicians to conduct further investigations more reliably and confidently.
To investigate the malignancy rate, useful PET parameters and their cutoffs in discrimination between malignant and benign lesions for the assessment of clinical implications of the incidentally identified focal F-18 FDG uptake.
The final reports of 16510 F-18 FDG PET/CT scans performed at our hospital between January 2016 and March 2022 were retrospectively reviewed to identify incidentally observed FDG uptake in the colon/rectum, thyroid, and prostate. Eighty-eight regions of colon/rectum, 48 regions of thyroid, and 39 regions of prostate were eligible for this study. For the total of 175 regions, the classification as malignant, premalignant, or benign was performed according to the final histopathological reports. PET parameters such as maximum and peak standardized uptake values (SUVmax and SUVpeak), MTV, mean SUV of metabolic tumor volume (mSUVmtv), and TLG were measured or calculated for the regions and compared among the malignant, premalignant, and benign lesions. ROC curves were plotted to determine the cutoff values for the parameters.
For the incidental focal colorectal hypermetabolic regions, 62.5% (55/88) had malignant or premalignant lesions. Both SUVmax and SUVpeak differentiated malignant/premalignant from benign lesions. No PET parameters involved in this study could differentiate malignant from premalignant lesions. SUVmax showed higher AUC than SUVpeak and had a cutoff of 7.6. For thyroid, 60.4% (29/48) of the cases were malignant. A high rate (89.7%, 26/29) of well-differentiated thyroid cancers were identified on FDG PET. BRAF mutation test results were available for 20 of 26 well-differentiated thyroid cancers and all 20 were confirmed to have the mutation. SUVmax alone differentiated malignant from benign lesions and a cutoff was 6.9. For prostate, 56.4% (22/39) were malignant. Only SUVmax differentiated malignant from benign lesions and a cutoff was 3.8. Overall, of the 175 focal hypermetabolic regions with final histopathological reports, 60.6% (106/175) were proven to be malignant or premalignant (in colon and rectum) lesions.
Approximately up to 60% of malignancy rate was shown for the incidentally observed focal hypermetabolic uptake in the colon/rectum, thyroid, or prostate. Overall, SUVmax was superior to several other PET parameters in distinguishing between malignant/premalignant and benign lesions. Hence, these findings may lead physicians to conduct further investigations more reliably and confidently.
A high rate of malignancy in the unexpectedly identified focal FDG uptake may assist the decision-making process for the nuclear medicine physicians, radiologists, and clinical physicians.