Published online Nov 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i31.11411
Peer-review started: July 21, 2022
First decision: August 4, 2022
Revised: August 16, 2022
Accepted: September 21, 2022
Article in press: September 21, 2022
Published online: November 6, 2022
Processing time: 97 Days and 17.9 Hours
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine has evolved as the most effective and secure way for protecting healthy individuals against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Patients with cancer have been recognized as a highly vulnerable group, and it is of important significance to clarify the risk and efficacy of vaccination. We aimed to clarify and compare the efficacy and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines between cancer patients and non-cancer individuals.
The new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has produced a global pandemic of COVID-19, and SARS-CoV-2 vaccine was considered to be a preventive way of accomplishing sufficient herd immunity against SARS-CoV-2 infection to eventually stop the COVID-19 pandemic. Current recommendations suggest cancer patients to undergo SARS-CoV-2 vaccination against COVID-19, but safety and effectiveness evidence is insufficient for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in cancer patients.
The present observational study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of two-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in cancer patients.
This multi-center observational study enrolled 132 eligible patients with cancer. Two weeks following the second vaccination dose, subjects underwent an analogous questionnaire survey. Utilizing a magnetic particle-based chemiluminescence immunoassay, serum levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies were measured to determine the effectiveness of vaccination. IgG levels ≥ 10 AU/mL were considered seropositive.
Local pain at the injection site was the most common side effect, and its incidence was higher in cancer patients than the healthy people (17.2% vs 9.1%; P = 0.035). No significant difference in headache, urticaria, or other adverse reactions was noted between patients with cancer and healthy people. The seropositivity incidence and antibody levels were significantly lower in cancer patients (P < 0.001). This analysis showed a relatively poorer response rate in patients on active immunosuppressive treatment and elderly cancer patients.
It is effective and safe to accept two-dose Chinese vaccines in cancer patients. Future studies are needed to focus on the efficacy of these vaccines in elderly cancer patients and those on active immunosuppressive treatment.
Further studies with larger populations of cancer patients undergoing two-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccination should be performed. Longer follow-up is needed to clarify the long-term efficacy and safety profile of two-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in cancer patients.