Published online Jul 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i19.6446
Peer-review started: January 24, 2022
First decision: April 7, 2022
Revised: April 29, 2022
Accepted: June 15, 2022
Article in press: June 15, 2022
Published online: July 6, 2022
Processing time: 151 Days and 2 Hours
Colorectal cancer remains a considerable challenge in healthcare nowadays and resection of intestinal polyps has been proved to reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer. Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and hot snare polypectomy (HSP) are the common endoscopic therapy. In this study, we compared the efficacy and safety of CSP and HSP.
HSP is a traditional method that has been used for many years and the incidence of complications is high because of its high frequency electrocoagulation. In recent years, CSP has become the first choice for endoscopists for the advantages of time saving, convenience and less complications. This randomized controlled study was carried out to compare the operating time, incidence of bleeding and perforation, use of titanium clips, and complete resection rate.
To investigate the efficacy and safety of CSP and HSP in the treatment of colorectal polyps with a diameter of 4-9 mm, and to discuss whether it can improve the complete resection rate and resection depth in combination with other endoscopic techniques.
From January 2020 to December 2020, a total of 301 patients with colorectal polyps 4-9 mm in size were treated with endoscopic therapy in our hospital, and were divided into the CSP group (n = 154) and HSP group (n = 147). The operation time, incidence of bleeding and perforation, use of titanium clips and complete resection rate of histology were compared between the two groups.
Two hundred and forty-nine patients (301 polyps) were included in the study. No differences in gender, age, polyp size, location, shape and type were observed between the CSP and HSP groups, and the resection rates in these two groups were 93.4% and 94.5%, respectively, with no significant difference. The use of titanium clips was 15.6% and 95.9%, respectively. The operating time was 3.2 ± 0.5 min and 5.6 ± 0.8 min, the delayed bleeding rate in the two groups was 0% and 2.0%, and delayed perforation was 0% and 0.7%, respectively.
In the treatment of sessile colorectal polyps < 10 mm, CSP has the same resection rate of impaired tissue integrity as HSP, but the delayed bleeding and perforation rate are lower in CSP group. CSP is a safe and effective method for polypectomy.
This study retrospectively analyzed patients with colorectal polyps 4-9 mm in size treated by endoscopy in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2020. A comparison of HSP and CSP was carried including surgical outcome and safety.