Published online Sep 6, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i25.7297
Peer-review started: March 24, 2021
First decision: May 1, 2021
Revised: May 14, 2021
Accepted: July 5, 2021
Article in press: July 5, 2021
Published online: September 6, 2021
Processing time: 167 Days and 16.1 Hours
Since the 19th century, appropriate lymphadenectomy has been considered a cornerstone of oncologic surgery and one of the most important prognostic factors. This approach can be applied to any surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. During surgery for colon and rectal cancer, an adequate portion of the mesentery is removed together with the segment of bowel affected by the disease. The adequate number of lymph nodes to be removed is standardized and reported by several guidelines. It is mandatory to determine the appropriate extent of lymphadenectomy and to balance its oncological benefits with the increased morbidity associated with its execution in cancer patients. Our review focuses on the concept of “complete mesenteric excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL),” a radical lymphadenectomy for colorectal cancer that has gained increasing interest in recent years. The aim of this study was to evaluate the evolution of this approach over the years, its potential oncologic benefits and potential risks, and the improvements offered by laparoscopic techniques. Theoretical advantages of CME are improved local-relapse rates due to complete removal of the intact mesocolic fascia and improved distance recurrence rates due to ligation of vessels at their origin (CVL) which guarantees removal of a larger number of lymph nodes. The development and worldwide diffusion of laparoscopic techniques minimized postoperative trauma in oncologic surgery, providing the same oncologic results as open surgery. This has been widely applied to colorectal cancer surgery; however, CME entails a technical complexity that can limit its wide minimally-invasive application. This review analyzes results of these procedures in terms of oncological outcomes, technical feasibility and complexity, especially within the context of minimally invasive surgery.
Core Tip: An optimal lymphadenectomy is the cornerstone of oncologic surgery. The concept of “optimal” or “adequate” relies on the balance between oncologic advantages and increased morbidity. The extent of lymphadenectomy in colorectal cancer surgery is a highly debated issue. The concept of “central vascular ligation” and “complete mesocolic excision” for radical lymphadenectomy in the era of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer have been investigated.