Published online Mar 26, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i9.99671
Revised: November 18, 2024
Accepted: December 2, 2024
Published online: March 26, 2025
Processing time: 137 Days and 20.3 Hours
In this article, we comment on the paper by Kakinuma et al published recently. We focus specifically on the diagnosis of uterine pseudoaneurysm, but we also review other uterine vascular anomalies that may be the cause of life-threating hemorrhage and the different causes of uterine pseudoaneurysms. Uterine artery pseudoaneurysm is a complication of both surgical gynecological and non-traumatic procedures. Massive hemorrhage is the consequence of the rupture of the pseudoaneurysm. Uterine artery pseudoaneurysm can develop after obstetric or gynecological procedures, being the most frequent after cesarean or vaginal deliveries, curettage and even during pregnancy. However, there are several cases described unrelated to pregnancy, such as after conization, hysteroscopic surgery or laparoscopic myomectomy. Hemorrhage is the clinical manifestation and it can be life-threatening so suspicion of this vascular lesion is essential for early diagnosis and treatment. However, there are other uterine vascular anomalies that may be the cause of severe hemorrhage, which must be taken into account in the differential diagnosis. Computed tomography angiography and embolization is supposed to be the first therapeutic option in most of them.
Core Tip: Uterine pseudoaneurysm can develop after delivery but there are several cases unrelated to pregnancy and obstetricians, such as conization, hysteroscopic surgery or laparoscopic myomectomy and gynecologists and radiologists should be aware of it. There are another uterine vascular anomalies that also may cause life-threatening hemorrhage, so awareness and suspicion is essential for early diagnosis and treatment. Doppler ultrasound is used for initial diagnosis, and magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography angiography are valuable methods to confirm the presence of the anomaly.