Editorial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 16, 2025; 13(20): 103729
Published online Jul 16, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i20.103729
Clinical bladder evaluation: A new, cost-effective, clinical method for neurogenic bladder evaluation and rehabilitation
Raktim Swarnakar, Shiv Lal Yadav
Raktim Swarnakar, Faculty of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Cancer Institute, Jhajjar, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, Delhi, India
Shiv Lal Yadav, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, Delhi, India
Author contributions: Swarnakar R contributed to conception and design; Swarnakar R and Yadav SL contributed to literature search and writing; all of the authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript to be published.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors declare no conflict of interest in publishing the manuscript.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Raktim Swarnakar, MD, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Cancer Institute, Jhajjar, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi 110029, Delhi, India. raktimswarnakar@hotmail.com
Received: November 28, 2024
Revised: February 21, 2025
Accepted: February 25, 2025
Published online: July 16, 2025
Processing time: 132 Days and 1.8 Hours
Abstract

Clinical bladder evaluation is a cost-effective, non-invasive method for diagnosing and managing urinary dysfunction, particularly in patients with neurogenic bladder or other impairments. This process aims to assess bladder capacity, storage, and voiding functions through simple, realistic, and resource-friendly approaches. It involves a structured series of steps, from history-taking and physical examination to bladder-emptying procedures, monitoring urine leaks, assessing reflex voiding, measuring post-void residual (PVR), and calculating total bladder capacity. These evaluations help differentiate between upper motor neuron and lower motor neuron bladder dysfunction, providing critical insights for tailored management. The interpretation of findings focuses on identifying bladder type, assessing leak timing and volume, evaluating reflex voiding, and measuring PVR and total bladder capacity. The results guide interventions such as timing self-clean intermittent catheterization, adjusting fluid intake, and using bladder diaries to monitor patterns. Clinical bladder evaluation is particularly advantageous in low-resource settings, as it avoids the risks and costs associated with urodynamic studies while reflecting real-life patient conditions more effectively. Despite its benefits, no validation studies currently exist for clinical bladder assessment, and its parameters, like maximum voided volume, remain underexplored compared to urodynamic measures. Given the accessibility, affordability, and practicality of this approach, it holds promise for widespread application, especially in primary care settings and among economically disadvantaged populations. This editorial describes the process step-by-step and highlights its role in improving patient outcomes while minimizing complications.

Keywords: Clinical bladder evaluation; Neurogenic bladder; Post-void residual; Upper motor neuron bladder; Lower motor neuron bladder; Bladder capacity; Incontinence; Low-resource settings; Urodynamics alternative

Core Tip: Clinical bladder evaluation is a cost-effective, non-invasive, and practical method for diagnosing and managing urinary dysfunction, particularly in low-resource settings. It avoids instrumentation-related risks, aligns with real-life patient conditions, and provides essential insights into bladder function, enabling tailored management strategies like self-catheterization, fluid intake adjustment, and use of bladder diaries. This approach is especially beneficial for patients with neurogenic bladder or those in economically disadvantaged regions, offering a feasible alternative to urodynamic studies.