Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 6, 2025; 13(16): 102740
Published online Jun 6, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i16.102740
Advantages of the single-center model in domino transplant processes: Operational planning and management experience
Amil Huseynov, Sevim Nuran Kuşlu Çicek, Murat Tuncer
Amil Huseynov, Medicine, Beykoz University, Istanbul 34180, Türkiye
Amil Huseynov, Department of Transplantation, Medicana International Istanbul, Istanbul 34180, Türkiye
Sevim Nuran Kuşlu Çicek, Department of General Surgery, Biruni University, Istanbul 34180, Türkiye
Murat Tuncer, Department of Nephrology, Medicana International Istanbul, Istanbul 34180, Türkiye
Author contributions: Huseynov A designed the research study, performed the research, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript; Kuşlu-Çiçek SN and Tuncer M performed the research; All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: This study was approved by the relevant Biruni University Ethics Committee (ID = 2024-BİAEK/04-02).
Informed consent statement: Patients were not required to give informed consent to the study because the analysis used anonymous data that were obtained after each patient agreed to treatment by written consent.
Conflict-of-interest statement: There are no conflicts of interest to declare.
Data sharing statement: sharing statement: The dataset that allowed us to obtain the findings of this research will be provided upon request. For this, the corresponding author of the study should be contacted. The e-mail address of the said author is atu-boy@hotmail.com.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Amil Huseynov, MD, Assistant Professor, Medicine, Beykoz University, Çubuklu, No. 69 Vatan Cd., İstanbul 34180, Türkiye. atu-boy@hotmail.com
Received: October 28, 2024
Revised: December 8, 2024
Accepted: January 7, 2025
Published online: June 6, 2025
Processing time: 105 Days and 19.4 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation is one of the most effective treatments for patients with end-stage renal disease. However, many regions face low deceased donor rates and limited ABO-compatible transplant availability, which increases reliance on living donors. These regional challenges necessitate the implementation of kidney paired donation (KPD) programs to overcome incompatibilities such as ABO mismatch or positive cross-matching, even when suitable and willing donors are available.

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness of a single-center domino KPD model in both operational planning and clinical management processes and to assess its impact on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Between April 2020 and January 2024, we retrospectively evaluated patients enrolled in our center’s domino kidney transplantation program. Donor-recipient pairs unable to proceed due to ABO incompatibility or positive cross-matching with their own living donors were included. Donors and recipients were assessed based on blood group compatibility, HLA tissue typing, and negative cross-match results. A specialized computer algorithm grouped patients into three-way, four-way, and five-way chains. All surgical procedures were performed on the same day at a single center.

RESULTS

A total of 169 kidney transplants were performed, forming 52 domino chains. These domino KPD transplants accounted for a notable proportion of our center’s overall transplant activity, which included both living donor kidney transplants and deceased donor transplants. Among these chains, the primary reasons for participation were ABO incompatibility (74%), positive cross-matching (10%), and the desire to improve HLA mismatch (16%). Improved HLA mismatch profiles and high graft survival (96% at 1 year, 92% at 3 years) and patient survival (98% at 1 year, 94% at 3 years) rates were observed, as well as low acute rejection episodes.

CONCLUSION

The single-center domino KPD model enhanced transplant opportunities for incompatible donor-recipient pairs while maintaining excellent clinical outcomes. By providing a framework that addresses regional challenges, improves operational efficiency, and optimizes clinical management, this model offers actionable insights to reduce waiting lists and improve patient outcomes.

Keywords: Kidney paired donation; Domino transplantation; Single-center model; operational planning; Altruistic donors

Core Tip: This retrospective study demonstrated that a single-center domino kidney paired donation program significantly increased transplant opportunities for incompatible donor-recipient pairs while achieving excellent clinical outcomes. By strategically utilizing altruistic living non-directed donors and centralizing all procedures within one center, the program enhanced operational efficiency and reduced ischemia times. Expanding this model could play a crucial role in decreasing transplant waiting lists and improving patient outcomes.