Editorial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 6, 2024; 12(16): 2686-2691
Published online Jun 6, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i16.2686
Antifungal pipeline: Is there light at the end of the tunnel?
Georgios Schinas, Nikolaos Spernovasilis, Karolina Akinosoglou
Georgios Schinas, Karolina Akinosoglou, Department of Medicine, University of Patras, Patras 26504, Greece
Nikolaos Spernovasilis, Department of Infectious Diseases, German Oncology Center, Limassol 4108, Cyprus
Author contributions: Schinas G, Spernovasilis N and Akinosoglou K contributed to the review of literature, writing and editing of the manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Nikolaos Spernovasilis, BSc, MD, MSc, PhD, Director, Department of Infectious Diseases, German Oncology Center, Nikis 1, Limassol 4108, Cyprus. nikspe@hotmail.com
Received: December 11, 2023
Revised: March 19, 2024
Accepted: April 19, 2024
Published online: June 6, 2024
Processing time: 169 Days and 15.7 Hours
Abstract

The misuse and overuse of classic antifungals have accelerated the development of resistance mechanisms, diminishing the efficacy of established therapeutic pathways and necessitating a shift towards alternative targets. Despite this pressing need for new treatments, the antifungal drug pipeline has been largely stagnant for the past three decades, primarily due to the high risks and costs associated with antifungal drug development, compounded by uncertain market returns. Extensive research durations, special patient populations and rigorous regulatory demands pose significant barriers to bringing novel antifungal agents to market. In response, the “push-pull” incentive model has emerged as a vital strategy to invigorate the pipeline and encourage innovation. This editorial critically examines the current clinical landscape and spotlights emerging antifungal agents, such as Fosmanogepix, Ibrexafungerp, and Olorofim, while also unraveling the multifaceted challenges faced in new antifungal drug development. The generation of novel antifungals offers a beacon of hope in the battle against antimicrobial resistance, but it is premature to declare them as definitive solutions. Their future role hinges on thorough clinical validation, cost-effectiveness assessments, and continuous post-marketing surveillance. Only through strategic implementation and integration with market strategies we can transform the landscape of antifungal development, addressing both the resistance crisis and the treatment challenges.

Keywords: Antifungals; Resistance; Fosmanogepix; Ibrexafungerp; Olorofim

Core Tip: The landscape of antifungal therapy has long been dominated by a handful of drug classes, namely azoles, polyenes, and echinocandins. Issues such as the development of resistance/tolerance, interactions and inherent toxicity, and narrow spectrum of activity have limited their therapeutic utility to clinicians. All these limitations underline the urgent need for novel approaches, with the pipeline for new antifungals having been relatively dry for about 30 years. Thankfully, the pharmaceutical landscape has recently shown promising signs of innovation regarding antifungal agents.