Published online Nov 26, 2020. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v12.i11.550
Peer-review started: April 28, 2020
First decision: July 5, 2020
Revised: July 18, 2020
Accepted: October 30, 2020
Article in press: October 30, 2020
Published online: November 26, 2020
Processing time: 211 Days and 16.5 Hours
Recent studies suggest that left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation has not been associated with an improvement in pulmonary function tests. However, the improvement seen in post-LVAD pulmonary hemodynamics outweighs the observed decrease in spirometry.
The studies investigating these parameters are not expansive and the overall methodological quality of the studies available is low. Further inquiry into the effects of the LVAD implantation on pulmonary hemodynamics, objective pulmonary function testing and on the observed clinical outcomes is needed.
This meta-analysis aims to stratify the observed outcomes in studies assessing these parameters, in order to better understand the factors contributing to the changes seen on pulmonary function testing and the correlation with pulmonary hemodynamics.
Our study literature search was performed on published data until December 2019, using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. After screening the studies 132 articles deemed relevant were reviewed. 128 articles were excluded based on our selection criteria. Four studies were analysed and included in this meta-analysis.
A total of four studies comprising 219 patients were included. The overall mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusion lung capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO) after LVAD implantation were significantly lower by 0.23 L (95%CI: 0.11-0.34, P = 00002), 0.18 L (95%CI: 0.03-0.34, P = 0.02), and 3.16 mmol/min (95%CI: 2.17-4.14, P < 0.00001), respectively. The pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance were significantly reduced after LVAD implantation by 8.56 mmHg (95%CI: 3.78-13.35, P = 0.0004), and 0.83 Woods U (95%CI: 0.11-1.55, P = 0.02), respectively. There was no significant difference observed in the right atrial pressure after LVAD implantation (0.61 mmHg, 95%CI: -2.00 to 3.32, P = 0.65).
LVAD implantation might be associated with a significant reduction of the spirometric measures, including FEV1, FVC, and DLCO, and an overall improvement of pulmonary hemodynamics.
The short term and long-term effects of LVAD on the pulmonary hemodynamics on and pulmonary function tests need to be expanded and are essential in order to better assess outcomes. The need for randomized control trials exists to identify confounding factors that may affect the outcomes seen in the studies analyzed. Also, further studies with extended follow-up are needed to assess the clinical outcomes of the changes seen on PFTs and hemodynamics.