Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2022; 14(2): 161-173
Published online Feb 27, 2022. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i2.161
Published online Feb 27, 2022. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i2.161
Table 1 Patients and tumors’ clinical and pathological characteristics before and after propensity score matching
Variable | All patients | P value | Matched patients | P value | ||
LTG (n = 78) | OTG (n = 107) | LTG (n = 69) | OTG (n = 69) | |||
Age (yr) | 52.7 ± 16.1 | 56.0 ± 12.0 | 0.120 | 53.42 ± 13.4 | 53.9 ± 12.7 | 0.828 |
Gender n (%) | ||||||
Male | 61 (78.2) | 78 (72.9) | 0.409 | 53 (76.8) | 52 (75.4) | 0.842 |
Female | 17 (21.8) | 29 (27.1) | 16 (23.2) | 17 (24.6) | ||
BMI (kg/m2) | 22.6 ± 3.1 | 23.7 ± 3.7 | 0.028 | 22.6 ± 3.1 | 22.8 ± 3.3 | 0.750 |
ASA n (%) | ||||||
1-2 | 74 (94.9) | 99 (92.5) | 0.522 | 65 (94.2) | 64 (92.8) | 1.000 |
3 | 4 (5.1) | 8 (7.5) | 4 (5.8) | 5 (7.2) | ||
The history of abdominalsurgery n (%) | ||||||
Yes | 10 (12.8) | 19 (17.8) | 0.362 | 8 (11.6) | 13 (18.8) | 0.236 |
No | 68 (87.2) | 88 (82.2) | 61 (88.4) | 56 (81.2) | ||
Tumor location n (%) | 0.775 | 0.698 | ||||
Upper | 30 (38.5) | 35 (37.6) | 28 (25.0) | 22 (25.0) | ||
Middle | 25 (32.1) | 42 (39.3) | 23 (33.3) | 26 (37.7) | ||
Lower | 9 (11.5) | 12 (11.2) | 7 (10.1) | 10 (14.5) | ||
More than two position or total | 14 (17.9) | 18 (16.8) | 11 (15.9) | 11 (15.9) | ||
Clinical T stage n (%) | 0.402 | 0.784 | ||||
2 | 3 (3.8) | 1 (0.9) | 3 (4.3) | 1 (1.4) | ||
3 | 19 (24.4) | 26 (24.3) | 17 (24.6) | 18 (26.1) | ||
4 | 56 (71.8) | 80 (74.8) | 49 (71.0) | 50 (72.5) | ||
Clinical N stage n (%) | 0.404 | 0.619 | ||||
0 | 1 (1.3) | 5 (4.7) | 1 (1.4) | 3 (4.3) | ||
1-3 | 77 (98.7) | 102 (95.3) | 68 (98.6) | 66 (95.7) | ||
Clinical TNM stage n (%) | 0.966 | 1.000 | ||||
II | 4 (5.1) | 6 (5.6) | 4 (5.8) | 4 (5.8) | ||
III | 73 (93.6) | 100 (93.5) | 64 (92.8) | 65 (94.2) | ||
IVA | 1 (1.3) | 1 (0.9) | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0) | ||
Tumor size (cm) | 5.2 ± 3.1 | 6.0 ± 3.4 | 0.126 | 5.4 ± 3.3 | 5.4 ± 3.1 | 0.953 |
Nerve invasion n (%) | 1.000 | 0.394 | ||||
Yes | 43 (55.1) | 59 (55.1) | 38 (55.1) | 33 (47.8) | ||
No | 35 (44.9) | 48 (44.9) | 31 (44.9) | 36 (52.2) | ||
Lymph-vascular invasion n (%) | 0.410 | 1.000 | ||||
Yes | 43 (55.1) | 59 (55.1) | 23 (33.3) | 23 (33.3) | ||
No | 35 (44.9) | 48 (44.9) | 46 (66.7) | 46 (66.7) | ||
Differentiation n (%) | 0.360 | 0.780 | ||||
Well | 4 (5.1) | 3 (2.8) | 1 (1.4) | 2 (2.9) | ||
Moderate | 24 (30.8) | 25 (23.4) | 22 (31.9) | 19 (27.5) | ||
Poor | 50 (64.1) | 79 (73.8) | 46 (66.7) | 48 (69.6) | ||
Pathological T stage n (%) | 0.254 | 0.282 | ||||
ypT0-1 | 8 (10.3) | 8 (7.5) | 6 (8.7) | 7 (10.1) | ||
ypT2 | 11 (14.1) | 7 (6.5) | 11 (15.9) | 4 (5.8) | ||
ypT3 | 23 (29.5) | 31 (29.0) | 17 (24.6) | 21 (30.4) | ||
ypT4a/4b | 36 (46.2) | 61 (57.0) | 35 (50.7) | 37 (53.6) | ||
Pathological N stage n (%) | 0.168 | 0.443 | ||||
ypN0 | 26 (33.3) | 26 (24.3) | 23 (33.3) | 18 (26.1) | ||
ypN1 | 12 (15.4) | 23 (21.5) | 11 (15.9) | 18 (26.1) | ||
ypN2 | 16 (20.5) | 14 (13.1) | 14 (20.3) | 11 (15.9) | ||
ypN3 | 24 (30.8) | 44 (41.1) | 21 (30.4) | 22 (31.9) | ||
Distant metastasis n (%) | 0.531 | 1.000 | ||||
Yes | 6 (7.7) | 5 (4.7) | 4 (5.8) | 3 (4.3) | ||
No | 72 (92.3) | 102 (95.3) | 65 (94.2) | 66 (95.7) | ||
Pathological TNM stage n (%) | 0.576 | 0.781 | ||||
IIA | 12 (15.4) | 13 (12.1) | 10 (14.5) | 9 (13.0) | ||
IIB | 17 (55.1) | 20 (64.5) | 17 (24.6) | 13 (18.8) | ||
III | 43 (55.1) | 69 (64.5) | 38 (55.1) | 44 (63.8) | ||
IV | 6 (7.7) | 5 (4.7) | 4 (5.8) | 3 (4.3) | ||
Adjuvant chemotherapy n (%) | 0.824 | 0.848 | ||||
Yes | 58 (74.4) | 78 (72.9) | 50 (72.5) | 51 (73.9) | ||
No | 20 (25.6) | 29 (27.1) | 19 (27.5) | 18 (26.1) |
Table 2 Neoadjuvant therapy and response before and after propensity score matching
Variable | All patients | P value | Matched patients | P value | ||
LTG (n = 78) | OTG (n = 107) | LTG (n = 69) | OTG (n = 69) | |||
Type n (%) | 0.345 | 0.784 | ||||
NAC | 69 (88.5) | 99 (92.5) | 61 (88.4) | 62 (89.9) | ||
NCRT | 9 (11.5) | 8 (7.5) | 8 (11.6) | 7 (10.1) | ||
NAC regimens n (%) | 0.491 | 0.659 | ||||
Platinum-based doublets | 41 (59.4) | 64 (64.6) | 36 (59.0) | 39 (62.9) | ||
Epirubicin/taxane-based triplets | 28 (40.6) | 35 (35.4) | 25 (41.0) | 23 (37.1) | ||
Cycles | 3.3 ± 1.3 | 3.8 ± 1.8 | 0.086 | 3.3 ± 1.3 | 3.6 ± 1.6 | 0.300 |
Clinical response n (%) | 0.939 | 0.859 | ||||
PR | 50 (64.1) | 68 (63.6) | 44 (63.8) | 45 (65.2) | ||
SD | 28 (35.9) | 39 (36.4) | 25 (36.2) | 24 (34.8) | ||
Mandard TRG score n (%) | 0.316 | 0.654 | ||||
1 | 26 (33.3) | 52 (48.6) | 22 (31.9) | 29 (42.0) | ||
2 | 4 (5.1) | 4 (3.7) | 4 (5.8) | 2 (2.9) | ||
3 | 30 (38.5) | 34 (31.8) | 26 (37.7) | 25 (36.2) | ||
4 | 5 (6.4) | 5 (4.7) | 5 (7.2) | 5 (7.2) | ||
5 | 13 (16.7) | 12 (11.2) | 12 (17.4) | 8 (11.6) |
Table 3 Description of intraoperative and recovery features before and after propensity score matching
Variable | All patients | P value | Matched patients | P value | ||
LTG (n = 78) | OTG (n = 107) | LTG (n = 69) | OTG (n = 69) | |||
Operation time (min) | 207.6 ± 49.3 | 205.2 ± 52.1 | 0.744 | 204.0 ± 45.8 | 207.1 ± 53.1 | 0.713 |
Blood loss (mL) | 197.2 ± 162.4 | 228.1 ± 193.4 | 0.252 | 200.6 ± 162.0 | 237.1 ± 194.9 | 0.116 |
Combined resection n (%) | 0.139 | 0.245 | ||||
Yes | 0 (0) | 4 (3.7) | 0 (0) | 3 (4.3) | ||
No | 78 (100) | 107 (96.3) | 69 (100) | 66 (95.7) | ||
Resection n (%) | 0.651 | 1.000 | ||||
R0 | 75 (96.2) | 105 (98.1) | 66 (95.7) | 67 (97.1) | ||
R1/R2 | 3 (3.8) | 2 (1.9) | 3 (4.3) | 2 (2.9) | ||
Blood transfusion n (%) | 0.608 | 0.507 | ||||
Yes | 13 (16.7) | 21 (80.4) | 11 (15.9) | 14 (20.3) | ||
No | 65 (83.3) | 86 (19.6) | 58 (84.1) | 55 (79.7) | ||
Length of incision (cm) | 10.29 ± 4.4 | 21.6 ± 3.8 | < 0.001 | 10.4 ± 4.6 | 21.9 ± 3.8 | < 0.001 |
Postoperative hospital stay (d) | 11.6 ± 7.0 | 15.1 ± 10.9 | 0.015 | 11.5 ± 7.1 | 16.0 ± 12.8 | 0.012 |
Dissected lymph nodes | 37.7 ± 14.5 | 37.8 ± 17.6 | 0.950 | 37.3 ± 14.2 | 35.5 ± 15.9 | 0.465 |
Time to ambulation (d) | 3.0 ± 1.2 | 3.4 ± 2.4 | 0.130 | 3.0 ± 1.3 | 3.4 ± 2.3 | 0.229 |
Time to first flatus (d) | 4.8 ± 1.7 | 5.2 ± 2.3 | 0.235 | 4.9 ± 1.7 | 5.1 ± 1.8 | 0.381 |
Time to first liquid intake (d) | 9.2 ± 5.6 | 10.1 ± 7.8 | 0.404 | 9.1 ± 5.6 | 10.7 ± 8.7 | 0.201 |
Time to removal of gastric tube (d) | 5.0 ± 2.0 | 6.5 ± 5.0 | 0.008 | 5.1 ± 2.0 | 6.8 ± 5.2 | 0.013 |
Time to removal of all drainage tubes | 9.7 ± 10.1 | 11.1 ± 11.1 | 0.391 | 9.7 ± 10.5 | 10.9 ± 10.3 | 0.488 |
Table 4 Postoperative complications before and after propensity score matching
Variable | All patients | P value | Matched patients | P value | ||
LTG (n = 78) | OTG (n = 107) | LTG (n = 69) | OTG (n = 69) | |||
Complications, n (%) | ||||||
Overall | 0.100 | 0.236 | ||||
Yes | 15 (19.2) | 32 (29.9) | 14 (20.3) | 20 (29.0) | ||
No | 63 (80.8) | 75 (70.1) | 55 (79.7) | 49 (71.0) | ||
Surgical complications | ||||||
Pancreatic fistula | 0 (0) | 1 (0.9) | 1.000 | 0 (0) | 1 (1.4) | 1.000 |
Abdominal bleeding | 1 (1.3) | 0 (0) | 0.422 | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 1.000 |
Anastomotic leakage | 5 (6.4) | 6 (5.6) | 1.000 | 4 (5.8) | 3 (4.3) | 1.000 |
Wound infection | 4 (5.1) | 5 (4.7) | 1.000 | 4 (5.8) | 4 (5.8) | 1.000 |
Lymphorrhagia | 1 (1.3) | 0 (0) | 0.422 | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 1.000 |
Intestinal obstruction | 0 (0) | 2 (1.9) | 0.510 | 0 (0) | 1 (1.4) | 1.000 |
Abdominal infection | 5 (6.4) | 9 (8.4) | 0.611 | 5 (7.2) | 2 (2.9) | 0.441 |
Duodenal fistula | 0 (0) | 1 (0.9) | 1.000 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | NA |
Gastroparesis | 0 (0) | 3 (2.8) | 0.264 | 0 (0) | 3 (4.3) | 0.245 |
Medical complications | ||||||
Pulmonary infection | 0 (0) | 6 (5.6%) | 0.04 | 0 | 5 (7.2) | 0.058 |
Arterial catheter-related infection | 0 (0) | 1 (0.9) | 1.000 | 0 (0) | 1 (1.4) | 1.000 |
Renal failure | 0 (0) | 1 (0.9) | 1.000 | 0 (0) | 1 (1.4) | 1.000 |
Clavien-Dindo classification n (%) | 0.331 | 1.000 | ||||
Grade I-II | 12 (80.0) | 20 (64.5) | 11 (78.6) | 14 (73.7) | ||
Grade III-V | 3 (20.0) | 11 (35.5) | 3 (21.4) | 5 (26.3) |
Table 5 Univariate and multivariate analysis of overall survival after propensity score matching
Variables | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
Hazard ratio | 95%CI | P value | Hazard ratio | 95%CI | P value | |
Age (yr): < 60 vs ≥ 60 | 0.806 | 0.491-1.323 | 0.393 | |||
Sex: Female vs Male | 1.244 | 0.711-2.177 | 0.444 | |||
ASA: 1-2 vs 3 | 0.978 | 0.355-2.696 | 0.965 | |||
Surgery: LTG vs OTG | 0.729 | 0.446-1.192 | 0.207 | |||
BMI: < 28 vs ≥ 28 | 1.608 | 0.504-5.133 | 0.422 | |||
Differentiation: Well/moderate vs Poor | 0.713 | 0.416-1.224 | 0.220 | |||
ypT stage: T0-3 vs T4 | 0.446 | 0.267-0.746 | 0.002 | 0.520 | 0.308-0.877 | 0.014 |
ypN stage: N0 vs N1-3 | 0.401 | 0.217-0.741 | 0.004 | 0.431 | 0.227-0.821 | 0.010 |
Metastasis: M0 vs M1 | 0.425 | 0.152-1.188 | 0.103 | 0.529 | 0.185-1.510 | 0.234 |
Nerve invasion: Yes vs No | 1.601 | 0.973-2.635 | 0.064 | 0.930 | 0.531-1.628 | 0.799 |
Lymph-vascular invasion: Yes vs No | 2.046 | 1.236-3.388 | 0.005 | 1.155 | 0.623-2.140 | 0.647 |
Mandard TRG: ≤ 3 vs > 3 | 0.510 | 0.312-0.833 | 0.007 | 0.666 | 0.390-1.136 | 0.136 |
Postoperative complication: Yes vs No | 0.635 | 0.338-1.193 | 0.158 | |||
Type of NAT: NAC vs NCRT | 2.248 | 0.900-5.619 | 0.083 | 1.647 | 0.619-4.382 | 0.317 |
Resection: R0 vs R1/R2 | 0.385 | 0.120-1.237 | 0.109 | 0.357 | 0.110-1.154 | 0.085 |
- Citation: Hu HT, Ma FH, Xiong JP, Li Y, Jin P, Liu H, Ma S, Kang WZ, Tian YT. Laparoscopic vs open total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer following neoadjuvant therapy: A propensity score matching analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14(2): 161-173
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v14/i2/161.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v14.i2.161