Hu HT, Ma FH, Xiong JP, Li Y, Jin P, Liu H, Ma S, Kang WZ, Tian YT. Laparoscopic vs open total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer following neoadjuvant therapy: A propensity score matching analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14(2): 161-173 [PMID: 35317541 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i2.161]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Yan-Tao Tian, MD, Chief Doctor, Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100021, Beijing Province, China. tianyantao@cicams.ac.cn
Research Domain of This Article
Surgery
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2022; 14(2): 161-173 Published online Feb 27, 2022. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i2.161
Table 1 Patients and tumors’ clinical and pathological characteristics before and after propensity score matching
Variable
All patients
P value
Matched patients
P value
LTG (n = 78)
OTG (n = 107)
LTG (n = 69)
OTG (n = 69)
Age (yr)
52.7 ± 16.1
56.0 ± 12.0
0.120
53.42 ± 13.4
53.9 ± 12.7
0.828
Gender n (%)
Male
61 (78.2)
78 (72.9)
0.409
53 (76.8)
52 (75.4)
0.842
Female
17 (21.8)
29 (27.1)
16 (23.2)
17 (24.6)
BMI (kg/m2)
22.6 ± 3.1
23.7 ± 3.7
0.028
22.6 ± 3.1
22.8 ± 3.3
0.750
ASA n (%)
1-2
74 (94.9)
99 (92.5)
0.522
65 (94.2)
64 (92.8)
1.000
3
4 (5.1)
8 (7.5)
4 (5.8)
5 (7.2)
The history of abdominalsurgery n (%)
Yes
10 (12.8)
19 (17.8)
0.362
8 (11.6)
13 (18.8)
0.236
No
68 (87.2)
88 (82.2)
61 (88.4)
56 (81.2)
Tumor location n (%)
0.775
0.698
Upper
30 (38.5)
35 (37.6)
28 (25.0)
22 (25.0)
Middle
25 (32.1)
42 (39.3)
23 (33.3)
26 (37.7)
Lower
9 (11.5)
12 (11.2)
7 (10.1)
10 (14.5)
More than two position or total
14 (17.9)
18 (16.8)
11 (15.9)
11 (15.9)
Clinical T stage n (%)
0.402
0.784
2
3 (3.8)
1 (0.9)
3 (4.3)
1 (1.4)
3
19 (24.4)
26 (24.3)
17 (24.6)
18 (26.1)
4
56 (71.8)
80 (74.8)
49 (71.0)
50 (72.5)
Clinical N stage n (%)
0.404
0.619
0
1 (1.3)
5 (4.7)
1 (1.4)
3 (4.3)
1-3
77 (98.7)
102 (95.3)
68 (98.6)
66 (95.7)
Clinical TNM stage n (%)
0.966
1.000
II
4 (5.1)
6 (5.6)
4 (5.8)
4 (5.8)
III
73 (93.6)
100 (93.5)
64 (92.8)
65 (94.2)
IVA
1 (1.3)
1 (0.9)
1 (1.4)
0 (0)
Tumor size (cm)
5.2 ± 3.1
6.0 ± 3.4
0.126
5.4 ± 3.3
5.4 ± 3.1
0.953
Nerve invasion n (%)
1.000
0.394
Yes
43 (55.1)
59 (55.1)
38 (55.1)
33 (47.8)
No
35 (44.9)
48 (44.9)
31 (44.9)
36 (52.2)
Lymph-vascular invasion n (%)
0.410
1.000
Yes
43 (55.1)
59 (55.1)
23 (33.3)
23 (33.3)
No
35 (44.9)
48 (44.9)
46 (66.7)
46 (66.7)
Differentiation n (%)
0.360
0.780
Well
4 (5.1)
3 (2.8)
1 (1.4)
2 (2.9)
Moderate
24 (30.8)
25 (23.4)
22 (31.9)
19 (27.5)
Poor
50 (64.1)
79 (73.8)
46 (66.7)
48 (69.6)
Pathological T stage n (%)
0.254
0.282
ypT0-1
8 (10.3)
8 (7.5)
6 (8.7)
7 (10.1)
ypT2
11 (14.1)
7 (6.5)
11 (15.9)
4 (5.8)
ypT3
23 (29.5)
31 (29.0)
17 (24.6)
21 (30.4)
ypT4a/4b
36 (46.2)
61 (57.0)
35 (50.7)
37 (53.6)
Pathological N stage n (%)
0.168
0.443
ypN0
26 (33.3)
26 (24.3)
23 (33.3)
18 (26.1)
ypN1
12 (15.4)
23 (21.5)
11 (15.9)
18 (26.1)
ypN2
16 (20.5)
14 (13.1)
14 (20.3)
11 (15.9)
ypN3
24 (30.8)
44 (41.1)
21 (30.4)
22 (31.9)
Distant metastasis n (%)
0.531
1.000
Yes
6 (7.7)
5 (4.7)
4 (5.8)
3 (4.3)
No
72 (92.3)
102 (95.3)
65 (94.2)
66 (95.7)
Pathological TNM stage n (%)
0.576
0.781
IIA
12 (15.4)
13 (12.1)
10 (14.5)
9 (13.0)
IIB
17 (55.1)
20 (64.5)
17 (24.6)
13 (18.8)
III
43 (55.1)
69 (64.5)
38 (55.1)
44 (63.8)
IV
6 (7.7)
5 (4.7)
4 (5.8)
3 (4.3)
Adjuvant chemotherapy n (%)
0.824
0.848
Yes
58 (74.4)
78 (72.9)
50 (72.5)
51 (73.9)
No
20 (25.6)
29 (27.1)
19 (27.5)
18 (26.1)
Table 2 Neoadjuvant therapy and response before and after propensity score matching
Variable
All patients
P value
Matched patients
P value
LTG (n = 78)
OTG (n = 107)
LTG (n = 69)
OTG (n = 69)
Type n (%)
0.345
0.784
NAC
69 (88.5)
99 (92.5)
61 (88.4)
62 (89.9)
NCRT
9 (11.5)
8 (7.5)
8 (11.6)
7 (10.1)
NAC regimens n (%)
0.491
0.659
Platinum-based doublets
41 (59.4)
64 (64.6)
36 (59.0)
39 (62.9)
Epirubicin/taxane-based triplets
28 (40.6)
35 (35.4)
25 (41.0)
23 (37.1)
Cycles
3.3 ± 1.3
3.8 ± 1.8
0.086
3.3 ± 1.3
3.6 ± 1.6
0.300
Clinical response n (%)
0.939
0.859
PR
50 (64.1)
68 (63.6)
44 (63.8)
45 (65.2)
SD
28 (35.9)
39 (36.4)
25 (36.2)
24 (34.8)
Mandard TRG score n (%)
0.316
0.654
1
26 (33.3)
52 (48.6)
22 (31.9)
29 (42.0)
2
4 (5.1)
4 (3.7)
4 (5.8)
2 (2.9)
3
30 (38.5)
34 (31.8)
26 (37.7)
25 (36.2)
4
5 (6.4)
5 (4.7)
5 (7.2)
5 (7.2)
5
13 (16.7)
12 (11.2)
12 (17.4)
8 (11.6)
Table 3 Description of intraoperative and recovery features before and after propensity score matching
Variable
All patients
P value
Matched patients
P value
LTG (n = 78)
OTG (n = 107)
LTG (n = 69)
OTG (n = 69)
Operation time (min)
207.6 ± 49.3
205.2 ± 52.1
0.744
204.0 ± 45.8
207.1 ± 53.1
0.713
Blood loss (mL)
197.2 ± 162.4
228.1 ± 193.4
0.252
200.6 ± 162.0
237.1 ± 194.9
0.116
Combined resection n (%)
0.139
0.245
Yes
0 (0)
4 (3.7)
0 (0)
3 (4.3)
No
78 (100)
107 (96.3)
69 (100)
66 (95.7)
Resection n (%)
0.651
1.000
R0
75 (96.2)
105 (98.1)
66 (95.7)
67 (97.1)
R1/R2
3 (3.8)
2 (1.9)
3 (4.3)
2 (2.9)
Blood transfusion n (%)
0.608
0.507
Yes
13 (16.7)
21 (80.4)
11 (15.9)
14 (20.3)
No
65 (83.3)
86 (19.6)
58 (84.1)
55 (79.7)
Length of incision (cm)
10.29 ± 4.4
21.6 ± 3.8
< 0.001
10.4 ± 4.6
21.9 ± 3.8
< 0.001
Postoperative hospital stay (d)
11.6 ± 7.0
15.1 ± 10.9
0.015
11.5 ± 7.1
16.0 ± 12.8
0.012
Dissected lymph nodes
37.7 ± 14.5
37.8 ± 17.6
0.950
37.3 ± 14.2
35.5 ± 15.9
0.465
Time to ambulation (d)
3.0 ± 1.2
3.4 ± 2.4
0.130
3.0 ± 1.3
3.4 ± 2.3
0.229
Time to first flatus (d)
4.8 ± 1.7
5.2 ± 2.3
0.235
4.9 ± 1.7
5.1 ± 1.8
0.381
Time to first liquid intake (d)
9.2 ± 5.6
10.1 ± 7.8
0.404
9.1 ± 5.6
10.7 ± 8.7
0.201
Time to removal of gastric tube (d)
5.0 ± 2.0
6.5 ± 5.0
0.008
5.1 ± 2.0
6.8 ± 5.2
0.013
Time to removal of all drainage tubes
9.7 ± 10.1
11.1 ± 11.1
0.391
9.7 ± 10.5
10.9 ± 10.3
0.488
Table 4 Postoperative complications before and after propensity score matching
Variable
All patients
P value
Matched patients
P value
LTG (n = 78)
OTG (n = 107)
LTG (n = 69)
OTG (n = 69)
Complications, n (%)
Overall
0.100
0.236
Yes
15 (19.2)
32 (29.9)
14 (20.3)
20 (29.0)
No
63 (80.8)
75 (70.1)
55 (79.7)
49 (71.0)
Surgical complications
Pancreatic fistula
0 (0)
1 (0.9)
1.000
0 (0)
1 (1.4)
1.000
Abdominal bleeding
1 (1.3)
0 (0)
0.422
1 (1.4)
0 (0)
1.000
Anastomotic leakage
5 (6.4)
6 (5.6)
1.000
4 (5.8)
3 (4.3)
1.000
Wound infection
4 (5.1)
5 (4.7)
1.000
4 (5.8)
4 (5.8)
1.000
Lymphorrhagia
1 (1.3)
0 (0)
0.422
1 (1.4)
0 (0)
1.000
Intestinal obstruction
0 (0)
2 (1.9)
0.510
0 (0)
1 (1.4)
1.000
Abdominal infection
5 (6.4)
9 (8.4)
0.611
5 (7.2)
2 (2.9)
0.441
Duodenal fistula
0 (0)
1 (0.9)
1.000
0 (0)
0 (0)
NA
Gastroparesis
0 (0)
3 (2.8)
0.264
0 (0)
3 (4.3)
0.245
Medical complications
Pulmonary infection
0 (0)
6 (5.6%)
0.04
0
5 (7.2)
0.058
Arterial catheter-related infection
0 (0)
1 (0.9)
1.000
0 (0)
1 (1.4)
1.000
Renal failure
0 (0)
1 (0.9)
1.000
0 (0)
1 (1.4)
1.000
Clavien-Dindo classification n (%)
0.331
1.000
Grade I-II
12 (80.0)
20 (64.5)
11 (78.6)
14 (73.7)
Grade III-V
3 (20.0)
11 (35.5)
3 (21.4)
5 (26.3)
Table 5 Univariate and multivariate analysis of overall survival after propensity score matching
Variables
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
Hazard ratio
95%CI
P value
Hazard ratio
95%CI
P value
Age (yr): < 60 vs ≥ 60
0.806
0.491-1.323
0.393
Sex: Female vs Male
1.244
0.711-2.177
0.444
ASA: 1-2 vs 3
0.978
0.355-2.696
0.965
Surgery: LTG vs OTG
0.729
0.446-1.192
0.207
BMI: < 28 vs ≥ 28
1.608
0.504-5.133
0.422
Differentiation: Well/moderate vs Poor
0.713
0.416-1.224
0.220
ypT stage: T0-3 vs T4
0.446
0.267-0.746
0.002
0.520
0.308-0.877
0.014
ypN stage: N0 vs N1-3
0.401
0.217-0.741
0.004
0.431
0.227-0.821
0.010
Metastasis: M0 vs M1
0.425
0.152-1.188
0.103
0.529
0.185-1.510
0.234
Nerve invasion: Yes vs No
1.601
0.973-2.635
0.064
0.930
0.531-1.628
0.799
Lymph-vascular invasion: Yes vs No
2.046
1.236-3.388
0.005
1.155
0.623-2.140
0.647
Mandard TRG: ≤ 3 vs > 3
0.510
0.312-0.833
0.007
0.666
0.390-1.136
0.136
Postoperative complication: Yes vs No
0.635
0.338-1.193
0.158
Type of NAT: NAC vs NCRT
2.248
0.900-5.619
0.083
1.647
0.619-4.382
0.317
Resection: R0 vs R1/R2
0.385
0.120-1.237
0.109
0.357
0.110-1.154
0.085
Citation: Hu HT, Ma FH, Xiong JP, Li Y, Jin P, Liu H, Ma S, Kang WZ, Tian YT. Laparoscopic vs open total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer following neoadjuvant therapy: A propensity score matching analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14(2): 161-173