Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Diabetes. Dec 15, 2023; 14(12): 1766-1783
Published online Dec 15, 2023. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v14.i12.1766
Table 1 Subject demographics and biochemical blood indices
ParameterHan population
Dai population
Healthy adults, n = 8
T2DM patients, n = 12
Healthy children, n = 15
Healthy adults, n = 10
T2DM patients, n = 12
Healthy children, n = 10
Sex as male/female3/58/47/85/59/34/6
Age in yr50.63 ± 5.8555.27 ± 11.765.00 ± 2.10145.70 ± 14.66255.92 ± 9.075.50 ± 1.183
FBG in mmol/L4.85 ± 0.389.98 ± 5.8913.23 ± 0.995.62 ± 1.367.74 ± 2.3934.52 ± 0.29
HbA1c as %5.55 ± 0.248.55 ± 2.5915.23 ± 0.155.58 ± 0.197.24 ± 0.773,45.19 ± 0.35
TG in mmol/L1.90 ± 0.632.22 ± 1.540.97 ± 0.2413.90 ± 4.1022.48 ± 1.911.12 ± 0.453
TC in mmol/L5.15 ± 0.613.76 ± 1.4514.01 ± 0.885.51 ± 1.044.85 ± 1.2643.91 ± 0.573
HDL-C in mmol/L1.28 ± 0.280.97 ± 0.2211.48 ± 0.341.23 ± 0.281.26 ± 0.401.39 ± 0.42
LDL-C in mmol/L3.12 ± 0.641.82 ± 0.7112.16 ± 0.6312.98 ± 1.232.75 ± 1.0542.16 ± 0.38
APO-A1 in g/L1.75 ± 0.271.30 ± 0.3011.75 ± 0.361.83 ± 0.231.74 ± 0.3741.61 ± 0.36
APO-B in g/L1.04 ± 0.150.68 ± 0.1810.72 ± 0.1910.98 ± 0.240.94 ± 0.290.66 ± 0.093
WBC as 109/L6.06 ± 1.446.41 ± 1.876.95 ± 1.116.79 ± 1.437.07 ± 2.098.32 ± 2.38
RBC as 1012/L5.19 ± 0.664.82 ± 0.574.89 ± 0.275.09 ± 0.655.05 ± 0.574.90 ± 0.42
TBil in μmol/L6.84 ± 1.5914.19 ± 9.3516.07 ± 4.488.71 ± 5.0826.19 ± 1.9845.74 ± 2.38
DBil in μmol/L3.84 ± 0.796.31 ± 2.9212.92 ± 2.343.96 ± 2.053.35 ± 1.0243.13 ± 1.40
IBil in μmol/L3.00 ± 0.857.88 ± 6.5113.15 ± 2.284.75 ± 3.0522.84 ± 1.3442.61 ± 1.413
ALT in U/L22.50 ± 11.3331.36 ± 26.3415.80 ± 14.8525.50 ± 15.6826.10 ± 17.2213.70 ± 14.96
AST in U/L21.13 ± 4.5827.36 ± 25.6131.50 ± 7.18123.26 ± 8.7123.14 ± 8.6427.40 ± 6.45
GGT in U/L34.75 ± 24.4051.82 ± 90.659.67 ± 2.94170.40 ± 66.34238.67 ± 22.80413.50 ± 8.153
BUN in mmol/L5.63 ± 1.404.59 ± 1.703.68 ± 0.8215.12 ± 1.515.23 ± 2.183.75 ± 0.91
Cr in μmol/L70.38 ± 8.7569.55 ± 20.9232.17 ± 7.60168.20 ± 17.6985.50 ± 30.2132.00 ± 4.003
Hcy in μmol/L15.63 ± 3.4512.35 ± 1.55114.20 ± 3.1213.59 ± 3.5716.69 ± 3.47411.55 ± 1.535
hs-CRP in mg/L1.85 ± 3.353.46 ± 5.232.84 ± 6.6651.84 ± 1.571.83 ± 1.4740.47 ± 0.503
Table 2 Significantly increased bacteria in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in the Han population
Taxa
Abundance, T2DM patients vs healthy adults
LDA score
P value
Bacteria. Bacteroidetes5.3534.9390.037
Bacteria. Bacteroidetes. Bacteroidia. Bacteroidales5.3534.9390.037
Bacteria. Firmicutes. Clostridia. Clostridiales. Veillonellaceae. Megamonas4.3473.7600.045
Bacteria. Bacteroidetes. Bacteroidia5.3534.9390.037
Table 3 Significantly increased gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in the Dai population
Taxa
Abundance, T2DM patients vs healthy adults
LDA score
P value
Bacteria. Proteobacteria. Gammaproteobacteria. Pseudomonadales. Moraxellaceae. Acinetobacter2.0472.7540.004
Bacteria. Proteobacteria. Gammaproteobacteria. Enterobacteriales. Enterobacteriaceae. Shigella4.7114.2880.021
Bacteria. Proteobacteria. Deltaproteobacteria3.1992.7640.044
Table 4 Differential gut microbiota observed in the Han population vs Dai population
Differential gut microbiota
Healthy children
Healthy adults
T2DM patients
Han population
d__Bacteria.p__Firmicutes.c__Clostridia.o__Clostridiales.f__Lachnospiraceae.g__Coprococcus.s__unidentified_Coprococcus0.542a0.259a0.461
d__Bacteria.p__Firmicutes.c__Bacilli.o__Lactobacillales.f__Streptococcaceae.g__Streptococcus.s__unclassified_Streptococcus0.000a0.800a1.000
d__Bacteria.p__Firmicutes.c__Clostridia.o__Clostridiales.f__Lachnospiraceae.g__Coprococcus0.521a0.286a0.475
d__Bacteria.p__Firmicutes.c__Bacilli.o__Lactobacillales.f__Streptococcaceae.g__Lactococcus0.009a0.019a0.083
Dai population
d__Bacteria.p__Proteobacteria.c__Alphaproteobacteria.o__Rhizobiales4.840a1.159a1.636
d__Bacteria.p__Firmicutes.c__Clostridia.o__Clostridiales.f__Veillonellaceae.g__unclassified_Veillonellaceae8.800a12.000a1.688