Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Aug 15, 2016; 8(8): 623-628
Published online Aug 15, 2016. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i8.623
Table 1 Demographic data of study cohort
n = 302
Age median (range)71 (30-99)
Sex (M/F)168/134
Stage
I42
II137
III114
IV9
Lymph node count17 (3-47)
Median (range)
Table 2 Analysis of impact of operative technique and patient factors on lymph node counts
n = 302nLymph node yieldP value
Surgical approach
Lap/lap assisted17818.7 ± 7.30.828
Open/lap converted to open12418.5 ± 8.3
Age
< 70 yr15218 ± 7.10.171
≥ 70 yr15019.3 ± 8.2
Sex
M16818.7 ± 8.20.894
F13418.6 ± 7.1
Table 3 Analysis of impact of pre-operative markers of systemic inflammatory response on lymph node counts
n = 302nLymph node countP value
NLR ≥ 410717.6 ± 7.10.036
NLR < 419519.2 ± 7.9
Albumin < 356618.8 ± 7.90.951
Albumin ≥ 3522618.7 ± 7.7
NLR ≥ 4 and albumin < 353917.9 ± 8.00.381
NLR < 419519.2 ± 7.9
Table 4 Analysis of association between neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and previously described predictors of poor prognosis
n = 302NLR < 4NLR ≥ 4P value
n195107
Lymph node positivity72/195 (36.9%)50/107 (46.7%)0.085
Lymph node ratio > 0.2513/72 (18%)17/50 (34%)0.044
Table 5 Description of modified glasgow prognostic score
mGPSScore
Crp ≤ 10, albumin ≥ 350
Crp ≤ 10, albumin < 350
Crp > 101
Crp > 10 and albumin < 352