Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jun 15, 2014; 6(6): 156-169
Published online Jun 15, 2014. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v6.i6.156
Published online Jun 15, 2014. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v6.i6.156
Table 1 Median survival (mo) in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer, according to whether primary tumor resection was performed or not
Ref. | Study period | Resection/No resection | No.of patients | OS(mo) | P value |
Scoggins et al[82] | 1985-1997 | Resection | 66 | 14.5 | 0.59 |
No resection | 23 | 16.6 | |||
Tebbutt et al[34] | 1990-1999 | Resection | 280 | 14 | 0.08 |
No resection | 82 | 8.2 | |||
Ruo et al[44] | 1996-1999 | Resection | 127 | 16 | < 0.001 |
No resection | 103 | 9 | |||
Michel et al[90] | 1996-1999 | Resection | 31 | 21 | 0.718 |
No resection | 23 | 14 | |||
Law et al[35] | 1996-1999 | Resection | 150 | 7 | < 0.001 |
No resection | 30 | 3 | |||
Benoist et al[79] | 1997-2002 | Resection | 32 | 23 | NS |
No resection | 27 | 22 | |||
Stelzner et al[45] | 1995-2001 | Resection | 128 | 11.4 | < 0.0001 |
No resection | 58 | 4.6 | |||
Konyalian et al[36] | 1991-2002 | Resection | 62 | 13 | < 0.0001 |
No resection | 47 | 5 | |||
Costi et al[91] | 1994-2003 | Resection | 83 | 9 | < 0.001 |
No resection | 47 | 4 | |||
Yun et al[37] | 1994-2004 | Resection | 283 | 15.3 | < 0.001 |
No resection | 93 | 5.3 | |||
Kaufman et al[92] | 1998-2003 | Resection | 115 | 22 | < 0.0001 |
No resection | 69 | 3 | |||
Galizia et al[38] | 1995-2005 | Resection | 42 | 15.2 | 0.03 |
No resection | 23 | 12.3 | |||
Evans et al[70] | 1999-2006 | Resection | 45 | 11 | < 0.0001 |
No resection | 57 | 2 | |||
Bajwa et al[39] | 1999-2005 | Resection | 32 | 14 | 0.005 |
No resection | 35 | 6 | |||
Mik et al[40] | 1996-2000 | Resection | 52 | 21 | NS |
No resection | 82 | 14 | |||
Frago et al[93] | 2004-2008 | Resection | 12 | 23.7 | 0.008 |
No resection | 43 | 4.4 | |||
Aslam et al[41] | 1998-2007 | Resection | 366 | 14.5 | < 0.005 |
No resection | 281 | 5.83 | |||
Chan et al[11] | 2000-2002 | Resection | 286 | 14 | < 0.001 |
No resection | 125 | 6 | |||
Seo et al[94] | 2001-2008 | Resection | 114 | 22 | 0.076 |
No resection | 83 | 14 | |||
Karoui et al[33] | 1998-2007 | Resection | 128 | 30.7 | 0.031 |
No resection | 85 | 21.9 | |||
Ferrand et al[22] | 1997-2001 | Resection | 156 | 16.3 | < 0.0001 |
No resection | 60 | 9.5 |
Table 2 Prognostic factors associated with overall survival in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer, according to whether primary tumor resection was performed or not
Ref. | Resection/No resection | No. ofpatients | OS(mo) | P value | PTR on multivariateanalysis [95%CI] | Other independent prognostic factors |
Tebbutt et al[34] | Resection | 280 | 14 | 0.08 | No | WHO-PS < 2, no peritoneal dissemination, low phosphatase alkaline and serum albumin levels |
No resection | 82 | 8.2 | ||||
Law et al[35] | Resection | 150 | 7 | < 0.001 | OR = 0.42 (0.27–0.66)1P < 0.001 | Unilobar LM involvement, no ascites, no chemotherapy |
No resection | 30 | 3 | ||||
Stelzner et al[45] | Resection | 128 | 11.4 | < 0.0001 | HR = 0.50 (0.27–0.90) P = 0.0212 | No chemotherapy, ASA score < 3, WHO-PS < 2, CEA level, age < 75 yr, extent of metastases, extent of primary tumor |
No resection | 58 | 4.6 | ||||
Konyalian et al[36] | Resection | 62 | 13 | < 0.0001 | HR = 0.3 (0.2–0.6) P < 0.00013 | Liver involvement < 50% |
No resection | 47 | 5 | ||||
Yun et al[37] | Resection | 283 | 15.3 | < 0.001 | HR = 0.53 (0.38–0.73) P < 0.001 | Metastatic site ≤ 1, high CEA level, chemotherapy, well-differentiated primary tumor |
No resection | 93 | 5.3 | ||||
Galizia et al[38] | Resection | 42 | 15.2 | 0.03 | OR = 3.91 (2.83-4.99) 0.26 (0.20-0.35)1P = 0.001 | WHO-PS < 2, liver involvement < 50% |
No resection | 23 | 12.3 | ||||
Bajwa et al[39] | Resection | 32 | 14 | 0.005 | OR = 0.26 (0.13-0.52) P = 0.0001 | Left sided primary tumor, unique primary tumor |
No resection | 35 | 6 | ||||
Mik et al[40] | Resection | 52 | 21 | NS | HR = 0.58 (0.36–0.82)1P = 0.004 | Unilobar LM involvement |
No resection | 82 | 14 | ||||
Aslam et al[41] | Resection | 366 | 14.5 | < 0.005 | P < 0.001 | Age < 80 yr, non-locally advanced primary tumor, N + stage |
No resection | 281 | 5.83 | ||||
Karoui et al[33] | Resection | 128 | 30.7 | 0.031 - | HR = 0.56 (0.38–0.83)1P = 0.004 | Secondary curative resection, well-differentiated primary tumor, anti-VEGF treatment, no extra-hepatic metastases |
No resection | 85 | 21.9 | ||||
Platell et al[83] | Resection | 243 | - | HR = 0.51 (0.37–0.69) P = 0.0001 | Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, ASA score < 3 | |
No resection | 70 | - | ||||
Venderbosch et al[12] | Resection | 286 | 14 | < 0.001 | HR = 0.73 (0.58-0.93) P = 0.01 | - |
No resection | 125 | 6 | ||||
Ferrand et al[22] | Resection | 156 | 16.3 | < 0.0001 | HR = 0.42 (0.30-0.60) P < 0.0001 | WHO-PS < 2, distal colon or rectal primary tumor, one metastatic site and alkaline phosphatase ≤ 300 UI/L |
No resection | 60 | 9.5 |
Table 3 Prognostic factors after primary tumor resection on multivariate analyzes
Ref. | Metastatic spread | No. of patients | Prognostic factors or predictive factors of postoperative morbimortality |
Rosen et al[43] | Liver, Peritoneum | 125 | Age < 65 yr, limited LM, no peritoneal carcinomatosis |
Ruo et al[44] | Liver, peritoneum, retroperitoneal lymph nodes, lung, bone, brain | 123 | Liver involvement < 25% |
Stelzner et al[45] | Mainly liver | 186 | WHO-PS, ASA grade, low CEA level, metastatic load, chemotherapy |
Vibert et al[47] | Liver | 80 | Serum AST level < 50 IU/l, age < 75 yr |
Yun et al[37] | Liver, peritoneum, lung | 503 | CEA level, well-differentiated primary tumor, chemotherapy |
Kleespies et al[46] | Mainly liver, lung, peritoneum | 233 | Liver involvement < 50%, chemotherapy, pT4 and/or N+ stage |
Costi et al[48] | Mainly liver, peritoneum | 71 | Age < 80 yr, nodal stage |
Stillwell et al[31] | Liver and extra-hepatic | 379 | Nodal stage < N2, well-differentiated primary tumor, no postoperative complications, no apical lymph-node |
Table 4 Complications related to in situ tumor in patients with unresectable stage IV colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy as initial management n (%)
Ref. | No. of patients | Primary tumor-related complications (%) | Type of complication during chemotherapy | Surgery required for complication (%) | ||
Obstruction | Bleeding | Perforation | ||||
Scoggins et al[82] | 23 | 9 | 2 (9) | 0 | 0 | 9 |
Sarela et al[71] | 24 | 29 | 4 (17) | 0 | 0 | 21 |
Ruo et al[44] | 103 | 29 | 30 (29) | 0 | 0 | 29 |
Tebbut et al[34] | 82 | 23 | 11 (13) | 3 (4%) | 5 (6) | 10 |
Michel et al[90] | 23 | 22 | 5 (22) | 0 | 0 | 22 |
Benoist et al[79] | 27 | 15 | 4 (15) | 0 | 0 | 15 |
Muratore et al[75] | 35 | 8.5 | 2 (6) | 1 (3%) | 0 | 3 |
Galizia et al[38] | 23 | 30 | 4 (17) | 1 (4%) | 2 (9) | 17 |
Evans et al[70] | 52 | 23 | 3 (6) | 9 (17%) | 0 | 2 |
Poultsides et al[76] | 233 | 11 | 18 (8) | 0 | 5 (2) | 7 |
Karoui et al[33] | 123 | 19 | 21 (17) | 0 | 2 (2) | 12 |
McCahill et al[77] | 86 | 16 | 10 (12) | 0 | 1 (1) | 12 |
Table 5 Postoperative outcome after primary tumor resection in patients with unresectable stage IV colorectal cancer
Ref. | Study period | No.of patients | Mortality(%) | Morbidity(%) |
Scoggins et al[82] | 1985-1997 | 66 | 5 | 30 |
Rosen et al[43] | 1984-1998 | 120 | 6 | 22.5 |
Tebbutt et al[34] | 1990-1999 | 280 | NM | 13 |
Ruo et al[44] | 1996-1999 | 127 | 2 | 21 |
Michel et al[90] | 1996-1999 | 31 | 0 | NM |
Benoist et al[79] | 1997-2002 | 32 | 0 | 19 |
Stelzner et al[45] | 1995-2001 | 128 | 11.7 | - |
Galizia et al[38] | 1995-2005 | 42 | 0 | 21 |
Evans et al[70] | 1999-2006 | 45 | 16 | NM |
Bajwa et al[39] | 1999-2005 | 32 | 3 | 22 |
Kleespies et al[46] | 1996-2002 | 233 | 4.7 | 46 |
Mik et al[40] | 1996-2000 | 52 | 7.7 | 40 |
Costi et al[48] | 1994-2003 | 71 | 8.5 | 24 |
Stillwell et al[31] | 1984-2004 | 379 | 9.2 | 48.3 |
- Citation: Mestier L, Manceau G, Neuzillet C, Bachet JB, Spano JP, Kianmanesh R, Vaillant JC, Bouché O, Hannoun L, Karoui M. Primary tumor resection in colorectal cancer with unresectable synchronous metastases: A review. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2014; 6(6): 156-169
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v6/i6/156.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v6.i6.156