Tang R, Chen GF, Jin K, Zhang GQ, Wu JJ, Han SG, Li B, Chao M. Efficacy of continuous gastric artery infusion chemotherapy in relieving digestive obstruction in advanced gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2023; 15(7): 1283-1294 [PMID: 37546554 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i7.1283]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Ming Chao, MD, Professor, Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang Province, China. chaoming@zju.edu.cn
Research Domain of This Article
Oncology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Table 2 Tumor radiologic response evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors criteria
After the first cGAIC, n (%)
After the second cGAIC, n (%)
After the third cGAIC, n (%)
After the fourth cGAIC, n (%)
After the fifth cGAIC, n (%)
After the sixth cGAIC, n (%)
CR
0 (0)
1 (3.7)
4 (21.1)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
PR
25 (86.2)
23 (85.2)
12 (63.2)
3 (100)
2 (100)
2 (100)
SD
4 (13.8)
3 (11.1)
3 (15.8)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
PD
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
Total
29
27
19
3
2
2
Table 3 Comparison of Stooler’s Dysphagia Score
Before cGAIC, n
After cGAIC, n
P value
Stooler’s Dysphagia Score
< 0.001
I
0
6
II
0
14
III
22
8
IV
7
1
Table 4 Univariate and Multivariate survival analysis for overall survival
Variables
n (%)
Univariate survival analysis
Multivariate survival analysis
HR
95%CI
P value
HR
95%CI
P value
Gender
Male
20 (69)
1.53
0.49-4.85
0.466
Female
9 (31)
1
Intravenous chemotherapy history
No
22 (76)
0.30
0.11-0.83
0.020
Yes
7 (24)
1
Gastric cancer surgery history
No
27 (93)
0.51
0.12-2.29
0.381
Yes
2 (7)
1
Pathology
Squamous cell carcinoma
2 (7)
9.24
1.62-52.69
0.012
Signet ring cell carcinoma
8 (27)
0.66
0.18-2.44
0.535
Adenocarcinoma
19 (66)
1
Tumor invasion
≤ T4a
19 (66)
0.48
0.17-1.32
0.153
T4b
10 (34)
1
Metastasis
No
9 (31)
0.63
0.20-1.98
0.425
Yes
20 (69)
Obstructive location
Gastroesophageal junction
6 (21)
1.21
2.24-6.10
0.816
Pylorus
21 (72)
0.35
0.07-1.68
0.188
Anastomosis
2 (7)
1
Stooler’s Dysphagia Score
III
22 (76)
0.34
0.11-1.02
0.055
IV
7 (24)
1
Relieve digestive obstruction
No
7 (24)
2.55
0.84-7.72
0.098
Yes
22 (76)
Radical resection after cGAIC
No
16 (55)
9.56
2.11-43.44
0.003
8.48
1.27-56.51
0.027
Yes
13 (45)
Intravenous chemotherapy after cGAIC
No
10(34)
6.20
2.14-18.00
0.001
8.61
1.42-52.17
0.019
Yes
19(66)
Immunotherapy after cGAIC
No
18(62)
4.12
0.93-18.28
0.063
13.09
1.64-104-12
0.015
Yes
11(38)
Table 5 Adverse events after constant gastric artery infusion chemotherapy
Adverse events
Grade 1, n (%)
Grade 2, n (%)
Nausea and vomiting
4 (13.8)
2 (6.9)
Abdominal pain
3 (10.3)
1 (3.4)
Gastrointestinal hemorrhage
0 (0)
0 (0)
Neutropenia
2 (6.9)
2 (6.9)
Anemia
1 (3.4)
0 (0)
Thrombocytopenia
2 (6.9)
2 (6.9)
Paresthesia
1 (3.4)
1 (4.3)
Liver enzyme increased
1 (3.4)
3 (10.3)
Citation: Tang R, Chen GF, Jin K, Zhang GQ, Wu JJ, Han SG, Li B, Chao M. Efficacy of continuous gastric artery infusion chemotherapy in relieving digestive obstruction in advanced gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2023; 15(7): 1283-1294