Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Oct 15, 2020; 12(10): 1167-1176
Published online Oct 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i10.1167
Table 1 Comparison of serum marker levels
GroupnHE4 (pmol/L)CEA (ng/mL)AFP (ng/mL)CA19-9 (ng/mL)
Case group805.746 ± 3.3604.274 ± 2.5303.358 ± 1.5598.450 ± 5.157
Benign control group563.294 ± 1.7382.471 ± 1.7022.561 ± 1.5875.271 ± 4.636
P value< 0.00010.00220.00420.0003
Table 2 Comparison of serum marker levels for diagnosing esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
VariableAUCStandard errorAsymptotic significanceAsymptotic 95%CI
HE40.7950.0380.0000.717-0.859
CEA0.7370.0430.0000.665-0.809
AFP0.6660.0490.0010.580-0.744
CA19-90.6970.0470.0000.612-0.773
Table 3 Comparison of sensitivity and specificity of serum markers for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (%)
VariableHE4CEAAFPCA19-9
Sensitivity66.253.765.073.1
Specificity85.782.166.060.7
Table 4 Summary of sensitivity and specificity of each biomarker in combination with each other
Variable combinationAUCStandard errorAsymptotic significanceAsymptotic 95%CI
HE4 + CEA0.8280.0340.0000.761-0.895
HE4 + AFP0.8190.0360.0000.748-0.890
HE4 + CA19-90.8370.0340.0000.770-0.904
CEA + AFP0.7750.0410.0000.696-0.855
CEA + CA19-90.7900.0390.0000.713-0.867
AFP + CA19-90.7170.0450.0000.635-0.805
Table 5 Correlation of characteristics of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with serum human epididymis protein 4 levels, n (%)
TotalSerum HE4 levels
P value
≤ 3.9 ng/mL> 3.9 ng/mL
All cases802753
Gender0.4395
Male56 (70.0)17 (63.0)39 (73.6)
Female24 (30.0)10 (47.0)14 (26.4)
Tumor location0.6777
Upper16 (23.8)5 (18.5)11 (20.8)
Middle45 (56.4)14 (51.9)31 (58.4)
Lower19 (23.8)8 (29.6)11 (20.8)
T grade0.0002
T1-221 (26.3)14 (51.9)7 (13.2)
T3-459 (73.7)13 (48.1)46 (86.8)
N stage0.0017
N026 (32.5)15 (55.6)11 (20.8)
N1-254 (67.5)12 (44.4)42 (79.2)