Liu SY, Ahsan Bilal M, Zhu JH, Li SM. Diagnostic value of serum human epididymis protein 4 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 12(10): 1167-1176 [PMID: 33133384 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i10.1167]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Shi-Yuan Liu, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 157 Xiwu Road, Xi'an 710004, Shaanxi Province, China. twinboysdoctors@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Oncology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Oct 15, 2020; 12(10): 1167-1176 Published online Oct 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i10.1167
Table 1 Comparison of serum marker levels
Group
n
HE4 (pmol/L)
CEA (ng/mL)
AFP (ng/mL)
CA19-9 (ng/mL)
Case group
80
5.746 ± 3.360
4.274 ± 2.530
3.358 ± 1.559
8.450 ± 5.157
Benign control group
56
3.294 ± 1.738
2.471 ± 1.702
2.561 ± 1.587
5.271 ± 4.636
P value
< 0.0001
0.0022
0.0042
0.0003
Table 2 Comparison of serum marker levels for diagnosing esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Variable
AUC
Standard error
Asymptotic significance
Asymptotic 95%CI
HE4
0.795
0.038
0.000
0.717-0.859
CEA
0.737
0.043
0.000
0.665-0.809
AFP
0.666
0.049
0.001
0.580-0.744
CA19-9
0.697
0.047
0.000
0.612-0.773
Table 3 Comparison of sensitivity and specificity of serum markers for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (%)
Variable
HE4
CEA
AFP
CA19-9
Sensitivity
66.2
53.7
65.0
73.1
Specificity
85.7
82.1
66.0
60.7
Table 4 Summary of sensitivity and specificity of each biomarker in combination with each other
Variable combination
AUC
Standard error
Asymptotic significance
Asymptotic 95%CI
HE4 + CEA
0.828
0.034
0.000
0.761-0.895
HE4 + AFP
0.819
0.036
0.000
0.748-0.890
HE4 + CA19-9
0.837
0.034
0.000
0.770-0.904
CEA + AFP
0.775
0.041
0.000
0.696-0.855
CEA + CA19-9
0.790
0.039
0.000
0.713-0.867
AFP + CA19-9
0.717
0.045
0.000
0.635-0.805
Table 5 Correlation of characteristics of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with serum human epididymis protein 4 levels, n (%)
Total
Serum HE4 levels
P value
≤ 3.9 ng/mL
> 3.9 ng/mL
All cases
80
27
53
Gender
0.4395
Male
56 (70.0)
17 (63.0)
39 (73.6)
Female
24 (30.0)
10 (47.0)
14 (26.4)
Tumor location
0.6777
Upper
16 (23.8)
5 (18.5)
11 (20.8)
Middle
45 (56.4)
14 (51.9)
31 (58.4)
Lower
19 (23.8)
8 (29.6)
11 (20.8)
T grade
0.0002
T1-2
21 (26.3)
14 (51.9)
7 (13.2)
T3-4
59 (73.7)
13 (48.1)
46 (86.8)
N stage
0.0017
N0
26 (32.5)
15 (55.6)
11 (20.8)
N1-2
54 (67.5)
12 (44.4)
42 (79.2)
Citation: Liu SY, Ahsan Bilal M, Zhu JH, Li SM. Diagnostic value of serum human epididymis protein 4 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 12(10): 1167-1176