Scientometrics
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jun 15, 2024; 16(6): 2842-2861
Published online Jun 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i6.2842
Trends and hotspots in gastrointestinal neoplasms risk assessment: A bibliometric analysis from 1984 to 2022
Qiang-Qiang Fu, Le Ma, Xiao-Min Niu, Hua-Xin Zhao, Xu-Hua Ge, Hua Jin, De-Hua Yu, Sen Yang
Qiang-Qiang Fu, Le Ma, Xu-Hua Ge, Hua Jin, De-Hua Yu, Sen Yang, Department of General Practice, Yangpu Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200090, China
Qiang-Qiang Fu, De-Hua Yu, Sen Yang, Shanghai General Practice and Community Health Development Research Center, Shanghai 200090, China
Xiao-Min Niu, Department of Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200030, China
Hua-Xin Zhao, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200090, China
Co-first authors: Qiang-Qiang Fu and Le Ma.
Co-corresponding authors: Sen Yang and De-Hua Yu.
Author contributions: Yang S, Fu QQ, Ge XH, and Yu DH conceptualized, designed, and refined the study protocol; Zhao HX, Ma L and Jin H participated in data collection; Yang S, Yu DH, Ma L, Fu QQ, and Niu XM conducted data analysis; Yang S, Yu DH, Ma L, and Fu QQ prepared draft the initial manuscript; all authors engaged in a critical review of the results, contributing to, reading, and approving the final manuscript. Fu QQ and Ma L significantly contributed to the experimental design and methodology refinement, employing their complementary expertise to develop a robust research design crucial for meeting the study's objectives. Their collaborative oversight of the experimental setup and protocol adjustments ensured the methodological integrity and reproducibility of the research, reinforcing their co-first authorship. Yu DH's role as a co-corresponding author was pivotal across all research stages, from conceptualization to manuscript preparation. His expertise and insight were critical in refining the study's design and ensuring methodological rigor, directly impacting the study's success and scientific integrity. Yu DH was central in fostering team collaboration, facilitating effective communication among members, and ensuring alignment with the study's objectives. His analytical skills significantly contributed to data interpretation, helping to draw meaningful conclusions and articulate the study's implications within the broader scientific discourse. Furthermore, Yu DH played a crucial role in manuscript preparation and revision, where his attention to detail and commitment to scientific accuracy were indispensable. His efforts ensured the clear and compelling communication of the study's findings to the scientific community. Recognizing Yu DH as a co-corresponding author reflects his comprehensive contributions to the research, highlighting his leadership, expertise, and dedication to fostering a collaborative and productive research environment. His role was instrumental not only in the study's execution but also in upholding the collaborative spirit and excellence that characterizes this research. Designating Ma L as a co-first author and Yu DH as a co-corresponding author is scientifically justified based on their contributions. Ma L's pivotal role in experimental design, methodology refinement, and initial manuscript drafting underscores his significant impact on the research's success. Similarly, Yu DH's extensive involvement in conceptualizing the study, fostering team collaboration, and ensuring the integrity and clarity of the manuscript highlights his indispensable leadership and expertise.
Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 72104183; Shanghai Municipal Health Commission Project, No. 20234Y0057; Shanghai Sailing Program, No. 20YF1444900; Shanghai Hospital Association Project, No. X2022142; Projects of the Committee of Shanghai Science and Technology, No. 20Y11913700; Guangdong Association of Clinical Trials (GACT)/Chinese Thoracic Oncology Group (CTONG) and Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, No. 2017B030314120; and Beijing CSCO (Sisco) Clinical Oncology Research Grant, No. Y-HS202101-0205.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
PRISMA 2009 Checklist statement: The authors have read the PRISMA 2009 Checklist, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the PRISMA 2009 Checklist.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Sen Yang, MD, Attending Doctor, Department of General Practice, Yangpu Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, No. 450 Tengyue Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200090, China. ysen669988@gmail.com
Received: January 12, 2024
Revised: March 10, 2024
Accepted: April 15, 2024
Published online: June 15, 2024
Processing time: 154 Days and 11 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal neoplasm (GN) significantly impact the global cancer burden and mortality, necessitating early detection and treatment. Understanding the evolution and current state of research in this field is vital.

AIM

To conducts a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of publications from 1984 to 2022 to elucidate the trends and hotspots in the GN risk assessment research, focusing on key contributors, institutions, and thematic evolution.

METHODS

This study conducted a bibliometric analysis of data from the Web of Science Core Collection database using the "bibliometrix" R package, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace. The analysis focused on the distribution of publications, contributions by institutions and countries, and trends in keywords. The methods included data synthesis, network analysis, and visualization of international collaboration networks.

RESULTS

This analysis of 1371 articles on GN risk assessment revealed a notable evolution in terms of research focus and collaboration. It highlights the United States' critical role in advancing this field, with significant contributions from institutions such as Brigham and Women's Hospital and the National Cancer Institute. The last five years, substantial advancements have been made, representing nearly 45% of the examined literature. Publication rates have dramatically increased, from 20 articles in 2002 to 112 in 2022, reflecting intensified research efforts. This study underscores a growing trend toward interdisciplinary and international collaboration, with the Journal of Clinical Oncology standing out as a key publication outlet. This shift toward more comprehensive and collaborative research methods marks a significant step in addressing GN risks.

CONCLUSION

This study underscores advancements in GN risk assessment through genetic analyses and machine learning and reveals significant geographical disparities in research emphasis. This calls for enhanced global collaboration and integration of artificial intelligence to improve cancer prevention and treatment accuracy, ultimately enhancing worldwide patient care.

Keywords: Gastrointestinal neoplasms; Bibliometric analysis; Risk assessment; Network analysis; Research trends

Core Tip: This study offers a novel bibliometric analysis of global trends in gastrointestinal neoplasms risk assessment from 1984 to 2022. It reveals a pivotal shift towards genetic insights and machine learning in risk assessment, highlighting the leading roles of the United States and China in research contributions. The findings demonstrate significant geographical disparities in research focus and methodologies, underscoring the need for enhanced global collaboration. This analysis not only maps the current landscape but also sets a direction for future research, emphasizing the integration of advanced technologies and international cooperation in the field.