Cruz-Diaz WE, Paitan V, Medina J, Flores R, Haro-Varas J, Mantilla R, Castro-Oliden V. Temozolomide and capecitabine regimen as first-line treatment in advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors at a Latin American reference center. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16(12): 4675-4684 [PMID: 39678797 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i12.4675]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Wagner Eduardo Cruz-Diaz, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Avenue Angamos Este 2520, Surquillo, Lima 15038, Peru. wagner.cruz@upch.pe
Research Domain of This Article
Oncology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Dec 15, 2024; 16(12): 4675-4684 Published online Dec 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i12.4675
Temozolomide and capecitabine regimen as first-line treatment in advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors at a Latin American reference center
Wagner Eduardo Cruz-Diaz, Victor Paitan, Jersinho Medina, Raymundo Flores, Juan Haro-Varas, Raul Mantilla, Victor Castro-Oliden
Wagner Eduardo Cruz-Diaz, Victor Paitan, Juan Haro-Varas, Raul Mantilla, Victor Castro-Oliden, Department of Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima 15038, Perú
Jersinho Medina, Department of Pathology, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima 15038, Perú
Raymundo Flores, Department of Radiology, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima 15038, Perú
Author contributions: Cruz-Diaz WE collected the data at the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas and wrote the initial manuscript; Paitan V and Haro-Varas J supervised the initial manuscript; Medina J reviewed the pathology slides, and Flores R reviewed the computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging images; Mantilla R was responsible for conducting the statistical analysis, and Castro-Oliden V provided expert guidance and supervision throughout the study and critically reviewed the final manuscript; All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: Approved by the Research Protocol Review Committee of Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, No. INEN 24-61.
Informed consent statement: The need for patient consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Wagner Eduardo Cruz-Diaz, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Avenue Angamos Este 2520, Surquillo, Lima 15038, Peru. wagner.cruz@upch.pe
Received: July 22, 2024 Revised: August 31, 2024 Accepted: September 19, 2024 Published online: December 15, 2024 Processing time: 113 Days and 14.2 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Numerous studies have indicated that the temozolomide and capecitabine regimen (TEMCAP) exhibits a certain level of efficacy in treating advanced, well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET). However, published data from Peru are limited. We hypothesize that this regimen could be a viable therapeutic option for advanced GEP-NET in the Peruvian population.
AIM
To evaluate overall survival (OS) in patients diagnosed with advanced GEP-NET treated with TEMCAP at the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas (INEN) in Lima-Perú.
METHODS
A retrospective review was conducted to identify patients with GEP-NEN treated with the TEMCAP regimen between 2011 and 2021 at the INEN. A total of thirty-eight patients were included in the final analysis: Thirty-five received TEMCAP as a first-line treatment, and three as a second-line treatment. The primary objective was to evaluate OS. The efficacy and safety of TEMCAP were assessed until the occurrence of unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS
The median age of the patients was 52 years (range 24-77 years), and 53.3% were female. The most common symptoms at diagnosis were abdominal pain in 31 patients (81.6%). Primary tumors included 12 in the rectum (31.6%), 11 in the pancreas (28.9%), 3 in the ileum (7.9%), 2 in the mesentery (5.3%), 2 in the small intestine (5.3%), 1 in the appendix (2.6%), 1 in the stomach (2.6%) and 6 cases of liver metastasis of unknown primary (15.8%). Five were neuroendocrine tumors (NET) G1 (13.2%), 33 were NET G2 (86.8%), five had Ki67 < 3% (13.2%), and 33 had Ki67 between 3% and 20% (86.8%). TEMCAP was administered to 35 (92.1%) patients as first-line treatment. OS at 12, 36, and 60 months was estimated in 80%, 66%, and 42%, respectively, with a median OS of 49 months.
CONCLUSION
TEMCAP therapy is a viable first-line option regarding efficacy and tolerability in areas where standard therapy is inaccessible.
Core Tip: In this study, patients diagnosed with advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors who were treated with the temozolomide and capecitabine regimen exhibited a median overall survival of 49 months, with 42% surviving at 60 months. The regimen was well-tolerated, and most patients experienced stable disease. These findings suggest that this treatment could be viable in settings where standard therapies are unavailable or inaccessible, although further prospective studies are needed for confirmation.