Published online Dec 15, 2021. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i12.1896
Peer-review started: March 3, 2021
First decision: April 19, 2021
Revised: May 3, 2021
Accepted: November 5, 2021
Article in press: November 5, 2021
Published online: December 15, 2021
Processing time: 286 Days and 3.1 Hours
The time for battling cancer has never been more suitable than nowadays and fortunately against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) we do have a far-reaching arsenal. Moreover, because liver cancer comprises a plethora of stages-from very early to advanced disease and with many treatment options–from surgery to immunotherapy trials–it leaves the clinician a wide range of options. The scope of our review is to throw light on combination treatments that seem to be beyond guidelines and to highlight these using evidence-based analysis of the most frequently used combination therapies, discussing their advantages and flaws in comparison to the current standard of care. One particular combination therapy seems to be in the forefront: Transarterial chemoembolization plus ablation for medium-size non-resectable HCC (3-5 cm), which is currently at the frontier between Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification A and B. Not only does it improve the outcome in contrast to each individual therapy, but it also seems to have similar results to surgery. Also, the abundance of immune checkpoint inhibitors that have appeared lately in clinical trials are bringing promising results against HCC. Although the path of combination therapies in HCC is still filled with uncertainty and caveats, in the following years the hepatology and oncology fields could witness an HCC guideline revolution.
Core Tip: The field of hepatocellular carcinoma has become highly interesting in recent years, given the emergence of a large amount of data on immunotherapy and com