Published online Aug 16, 2022. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i8.487
Peer-review started: February 14, 2022
First decision: April 5, 2022
Revised: April 19, 2022
Accepted: July 22, 2022
Article in press: July 22, 2022
Published online: August 16, 2022
Processing time: 181 Days and 15.4 Hours
While endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) remains the gold standard for main pancreatic duct (MPD) intervention, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided MPD access has emerged as a safe and effective alternative when ERCP fails. A key step in EUS-guided intervention is dilation of the tract created between the gastrointestinal lumen and pancreatic duct, however there is limited data regarding the optimal dilation device and technique. Furthermore, current tools were designed primarily for biliary intervention, including hydrostatic balloons, tapered bougies, and electrocautery-enhanced catheters.
A small diameter, hydrostatic balloon would theoretically allow for safe dilation while minimizing the risk of adverse events, however commercially available devices are limited. Percutaneous angioplasty balloons (PTABs) are small diameter balloons that were initially designed for vascular interventions. They can be deployed over a standard guidewire and utilized on endoscopic platforms to dilate the access tract created during EUS-guided access as well as high grade strictures. However, data on the use of these devices is limited to a handful of case reports.
The main objective of this study is to describe the efficacy and safety of PTAB use during EUS-guided MPD access. The primary outcome was technical success with secondary outcomes of clinical success and adverse event rate. The objectives of this study provide key, real-word information on the use of PTABs for clinicians as well as preliminary data to inform future prospective studies.
This is a retrospective, single center cohort study performed at an academic tertiary care center which includes all patients from 2011 to 2021 who underwent EUS-guided MPD which utilized a PTAB. Patients were identified retrospectively from a procedural supply database and clinical information was extracted from the electronic medical record.
A total of 23 cases were identified. Intervention was performed in the setting of chronic pancreatitis in 13 (56%), post-surgical stricture in 8 (35%), and post-surgical leak in 2 (9%). Technical success was achieved in 20 (87%) cases with 6 (26%) adverse events. Adverse events were all mild in severity and included 3 admissions for post-procedural pain, 2 pancreatitis, and 1 pancreatic duct leak.
This study demonstrates that PTABs can be used to consistently access the MPD for EUS-guided interventions with an acceptable safety profile. In the absence of dedicated devices, endoscopists can consider using cross-platform PTABs for initial dilation prior to antegrade interventions.
Further prospective, randomized studies are needed to compare the efficacy and safety of PTABs to other dilating devices and techniques.