Published online Dec 8, 2015. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i28.2841
Peer-review started: August 18, 2015
First decision: October 14, 2015
Revised: October 22, 2015
Accepted: November 10, 2015
Article in press: November 11, 2015
Published online: December 8, 2015
Processing time: 109 Days and 17.5 Hours
AIM: To compare efficacy of telaprevir (TVR) and simeprevir (SMV) combined with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) while treating chronic hepatitis C (CHC).
METHODS: In all, 306 CHC patients were included in this study. There were 159 patients in the TVR combination therapy group and 147 patients in the SMV combination therapy group. To evaluate pretreatment factors contributing to sustained virological response at 12 wk (SVR12), univariate and multivariate analyses were performed in TVR and SMV groups. To adjust for patient background between TVR and SMV groups, propensity score matching was performed. Virological response during treatment and SVR12 were evaluated.
RESULTS: Overall rates of SVR12 [undetectable serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels] were 79.2% and 69.4% in TVR and SMV groups, respectively. Patients in the SMV group were older, had higher serum HCV RNA levels, lower hemoglobin, higher prevalence of unfavorable interleukin-28B (IL28B) genotype (rs8099917), and poorer response to previous PEG-IFN and RBV treatment. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for backgrounds (n = 104) and demonstrated SVR12 rates of 74.0% and 73.1% in the TVR and SMV groups, respectively. In the TVR group, discontinuation rates were higher because of adverse events; however, breakthrough and nonresponse was more frequent in the in SMV group. Multivariate analysis revealed IL28B genotype (rs8099917) as the only independent predictive factor of SVR12 in both groups.
CONCLUSION: SVR12 rates were almost identical following propensity score matching.
Core tip: We evaluated and compared the efficacy of telaprevir (TVR) and simeprevir (SMV) in combination with pegylated interferon and ribavirin in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. patients in real-world clinical settings. In the TVR group, the proportion of patients achieving a virological response was higher than that in the SMV group according to the original data. After propensity score matching, the proportion of patients achieving a virological response during treatment and after 12 wk was almost identical between the two groups with no significant difference observed.