Published online Feb 27, 2022. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i2.471
Peer-review started: October 12, 2021
First decision: November 17, 2021
Revised: November 19, 2021
Accepted: January 11, 2022
Article in press: January 11, 2022
Published online: February 27, 2022
Processing time: 132 Days and 17.4 Hours
It has been studied that fluctuating glucose levels may superimpose glycated hemoglobin in determining the risk for diabetes mellitus (DM) complications. While non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) remains a predominant cause of elevated transaminases in Type 2 DM due to a strong underplay of metabolic syndrome, Type 1 DM can contrastingly affect the liver in a direct, benign, and reversible manner, causing Glycogen hepatopathy (GH) - with a good prognosis.
A 50-year-old female with history of poorly controlled type 1 DM, status post cholecystectomy several years ago, and obesity presented with nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. Her vitals at the time of admission were stable. On physical examination, she had diffuse abdominal tenderness. Her finger-stick glucose was 612 mg/dL with elevated ketones and low bicarbonate. Her labs revealed abnormal liver studies: AST 1460 U/L, ALP: 682 U/L, ALP: 569 U/L, total bilirubin: 0.3mg/dL, normal total protein, albumin, and prothrombin time/ international normalized ratio (PT/INR). A magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) demonstrated mild intra and extra-hepatic biliary ductal dilation without evidence of choledocholithiasis. She subsequently underwent a diagnostic ERCP which showed a moderately dilated CBD, for which a stent was placed. Studies for viral hepatitis, Wilson’s Disease, alpha-1-antitrypsin, and iron panel came back normal. Due to waxing and waning transaminases during the hospital course, a liver biopsy was eventually done, revealing slightly enlarged hepatocytes that were PAS-positive, suggestive of glycogenic hepatopathy. With treatment of hyperglycemia and ensuing strict glycemic control, her transaminases improved, and she was discharged.
With a negative hepatocellular and cholestatic work-up, our patient likely had GH, a close differential for NASH but a poorly recognized entity. GH, first described in 1930 as a component of Mauriac syndrome, is believed to be due to glucose and insulin levels fluctuation. Dual echo magnetic resonance imaging sequencing and computed tomography scans of the liver are helpful to differentiate GH from NASH. Still, liver biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis. Biopsy predominantly shows intra-cellular glycogen deposition, with minimal or no steatosis or inflammation. As GH is reversible with good glycemic control, it should be one of the differentials in patients with brittle diabetes and elevated transaminases. GH, however, can cause a dramatic elevation in transaminases (50-1600 IU/L) alongside hepatomegaly and abdominal pain that would raise concern for acute liver injury leading to exhaustive work-up, as was in our patient above. Fluctuation in transaminases is predominantly seen during hyperglycemic episodes, and proper glycemic control is the mainstay of the treatment.
Core Tip: Glycogen hepatopathy is a poorly understood complication of type 1 diabetes mellitus patients who have poor glycemic control. Its presentation can closely mimic non-alcoholic fatty liver disease creating a diagnostic enigma in patients with diabetes. After excluding other common causes of hepatitis, one must keep this elusive diagnosis in mind. Hepatic biopsy has been the mainstay for diagnosis, however, with recent advancements sequential magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scans are also sensitive but limited by availability.